If gameplay in our own end is an issue, Parekh has far more red flags than Levshunov if we’re being honest. Especially off the puck. And if either of these two was to be compared to Drys, I feel like it’d have to be Parekh

I would pray that they don’t take a guy at 3OA just because they’re familiar with him after seeing a lot of Saginaw games too. They should feel totally familiar with everyone that’s on the table at 3OA with where we’ve been in the standings all year long

I agree that Parekh could totally be on the table at 3. But I would absolutely be surprised if they took him there

A dcorps of:

Mintyukov, Zellweger and Parekh doesn’t put fear in the opposition .

I agree that while it might put fear into an opponent’s defense and PK, it won’t put much fear in their offense.

If Silayev was a RHD and had just a bit more transition/offense to his game (from the limited sample I’d seen) he’d be a good fit.

I personally feel like some of the better fits for ANA are deeper in the draft. Yakemchuk feels like he fits the mold reasonably well and I like the meaner part of his game. Helenius would be a solid top 6RW/3C with a great work ethic and 200ft game as well