SalarySwishSalarySwish

Lucic

Created by: battadan
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 2, 2019
Published: Jul. 2, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
weird idea that might be good for both sides (i'm a hawk fan though).
trade seabs to Edmonton for Lucic. add whatever you'd like to add on either side to make it fair in your eyes. here is my justification:

Edmonton:
-lose a forward that is absolutely not effective anywhere in that lineup.
- gain a 3 time Stanley Cup winner who will slot in the 4-6 spot.
- as much as we say he is old, he is still a great dman to have on your team (cap hit aside)
- Edmonton is in win now mode. Seabs can definitely help over the next 2-3 years.

Chicago:
- save $875k/year
- one less year of contract
- we have so many expected NHL dman coming the next couple years i'd rather trade him, than have him in the press box
- i think Edmonton would have to add a pick or prospect to make this even.

Let me know your thoughts.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$750,000
3$750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,500,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (BUF)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (CAR)
2.
CHI
  1. 2020 7th round pick (COL)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (COL)
3.
CHI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (EDM)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$64,655,853$0$3,915,000$16,844,147
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 2, 2019 at 5:10 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 930
Why exactly are we giving up a 2nd? I'm sorry but I truly would rather have lucic then Seabrook.. Seabrook is brutal lucic at least provides hits lol
Jul. 2, 2019 at 5:14 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 151
Likes: 45
Quoting: Dylan1995
Why exactly are we giving up a 2nd? I'm sorry but I truly would rather have lucic then Seabrook.. Seabrook is brutal lucic at least provides hits lol


I'm glad a Edmonton fan commented. that's interesting to hear your side. idk many Oiler fans that like him in any way. so if the pick was going from chicago to Oilers would that balance it in your mind? or just a hard no on this premise?
Jul. 2, 2019 at 5:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 930
Quoting: battadan
I'm glad a Edmonton fan commented. that's interesting to hear your side. idk many Oiler fans that like him in any way. so if the pick was going from chicago to Oilers would that balance it in your mind? or just a hard no on this premise?


Honestly I just wouldnt even move either of them they both wouldnt waive there nmc lucic likely ends up in either Vancouver or staying in Edmonton he is what he is an next year we dont have cap problems just gotta stay patient
battadan liked this.
Jul. 2, 2019 at 5:19 p.m.
#4
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,010
Not worth it. Seabs produces more than Lucic and Seabs is a dman. I'll take the guy that produces 20-30 points on defense than a forward that produces at the same rate. If we trade Murphy to an in division contender, they are paying way more than that.
Jul. 2, 2019 at 5:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 151
Likes: 45
ha funny how each fan prefers their player. i like to think that means its pretty close to a equal trade proposal.

CFMAN- you don't think its worth it to open a spot for one of our D prospects? i would entertain the idea. i agree seabs is better than lucic in many ways, but could be a unqie solution only avail this, or next year.
See All