SalarySwishSalarySwish

CBO- Seabrook

Created by: NicholasM2699
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 8, 2020
Published: Apr. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I know all Leafs fans will come with their pitchforks and burning stakes to say this is lopsided, but a second round pick and a signed stay at home D-man would work for them. In order to improve you need to deal from areas of strength. Kapanen or Johnnson need to be moved and I feel like a two time cup winning stay at home D that is young will certainly help their group. Hawks get Strome and Kubalik tied up for the forseeable future and you trust that offensive depth and the raw skill and prospect on the back end will have success and push one another in progression.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (PIT)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$79,500,000$63,717,039$1,090,244$4,282,500$15,782,961
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Apr. 8, 2020 at 3:01 p.m.
#1
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,683
Likes: 9,837
I don't think the issue is value. TOR needs cap more than CHI if there's a CBO. I think it's just that Maatta on a Run and Gun team like TOR and PIT diminishes what Maatta brings. Maatta's a smart defensive Dman that's physical and makes smart plays. He's also slow. I don't think Maatta's a good fit in TOR.
NicholasM2699 liked this.
Apr. 8, 2020 at 3:05 p.m.
#2
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,317
Likes: 5,660
Quoting: exo2769
I don't think the issue is value. TOR needs cap more than CHI if there's a CBO. I think it's just that Maatta on a Run and Gun team like TOR and PIT diminishes what Maatta brings. Maatta's a smart defensive Dman that's physical and makes smart plays. He's also slow. I don't think Maatta's a good fit in TOR.


Absolutely this.

But also Kapanen is worth WAAAAY more than that.
This trade is somewhat equivalent to offering Zaitsev and a 2nd for Debrincat.
So NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THANKYOU
Apr. 8, 2020 at 3:13 p.m.
#3
DaBus
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 489
Quoting: Random2152
Absolutely this.

But also Kapanen is worth WAAAAY more than that.
This trade is somewhat equivalent to offering Zaitsev and a 2nd for Debrincat.
So NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THANKYOU


DeBrincat is way better than Kapanen. Kapanen is your third best RW. While I think Maatta and a 2nd won't cut it, I do not think he has insane value. A 2nd rounder and a B or better prospect should get it done.
NicholasM2699 liked this.
Apr. 8, 2020 at 3:22 p.m.
#4
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,317
Likes: 5,660
Quoting: DaBus
DeBrincat is way better than Kapanen. Kapanen is your third best RW. While I think Maatta and a 2nd won't cut it, I do not think he has insane value. A 2nd rounder and a B or better prospect should get it done.


It was a rough comparison off the top of my head. Maatta is prolly a touch better than Zaitsev and his contract certainly is and Debrincat is better than Kapanen. The point being made is that in no world is the proposed trade even remotely fair.

Also Malkin is the 2nd best centre on his team, doesn't mean he isn't better than many 1C's. Likewise Kapanen may be the 3rd best RW on the Leafs but he is in the top 6 on almost any other team. People always seem to forget that the Leafs have the best 1-12 in the league when they make statements like "Kap or Mango are 3rd liners"

And as for your proposal - you are still way short. Kapanen is quite good. Try a 1st and a B+ near NHL ready prospect value wise and much more considering there is no reason for the Leafs to move him and that package doesn't make sense for the Leafs to do.
Apr. 8, 2020 at 3:22 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 234
Likes: 40
Quoting: Random2152
Absolutely this.

But also Kapanen is worth WAAAAY more than that.
This trade is somewhat equivalent to offering Zaitsev and a 2nd for Debrincat.
So NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THANKYOU


See I think this may be some Leaf's bias. The Cat has a 40 goal campaign under his belt. Kapanen isn't close to that despite his speed and playmaking. I think Maata may have been the wrong piece but a defensman of that style and a 2nd rd pick should be more than enough to get that done.
See All