SalarySwishSalarySwish

Ducks/Jets

Created by: Boojets
Team: 2016-17 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 28, 2016
Published: Aug. 28, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Connor, Kyle
  2. Copp, Andrew
  3. Little, Bryan
  4. 2017 1st round pick (WPG)
WPG
    rights to Lindholm and Rakell
    2.
    ANA
    1. Yakupov, Nail
    EDM
    1. Bieksa, Kevin
    2. 2017 3rd round pick (ANA)
    3.
    ANA
    1. Borowiecki, Mark
    OTT
    1. Stoner, Clayton
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2017
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2018
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2019
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$73,000,000$64,592,500$0$850,000$8,407,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Connor, Kyle
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW
    UFA - 3
    Getzlaf, Ryan
    $8,250,000$8,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Perry, Corey
    $8,625,000$8,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Kesler, Ryan
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Silfverberg, Jakob
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    Cogliano, Andrew
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Little, Bryan
    $4,700,000$4,700,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Yakupov, Nail
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Garbutt, Ryan
    $900,000$900,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Copp, Andrew
    $925,000$925,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Raymond, Mason
    $675,000$675,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Vermette, Antoine
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Fowler, Cam
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Manson, Josh
    $825,000$825,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Bernier, Jonathan
    $4,150,000$4,150,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Despres, Simon
    $3,700,000$3,700,000
    RD
    UFA - 5
    Vatanen, Sami
    $2,437,500$2,437,500
    LD/RD
    UFA - 4
    Gibson, John
    $2,300,000$2,300,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Theodore, Shea
    $863,333$863,333
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Montour, Brandon
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Borowiecki, Mark
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Holzer, Korbinian
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Thompson, Nate
    $1,600,000$1,600,000
    C
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    Aug. 28, 2016 at 3:28 p.m.
    #1
    Jded
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,541
    Likes: 1,582
    I don't get it.. Rakell and Lindholm both fill needs for the Ducks, why trade them for this? Little is in his prime, yet scored less than Raks who is sill young and improving (not to mention Raks will not cost $4.7m). And then Lindholm - likely the Duck's #1 Dman for the next decade - is going for a 4th liner, prospect, and pick. The Ducks have an aging core and are trying to win now. How does this achieve that at all?

    The D core is so thinned that you have Montour and Theo playing together, who - despite great potential - have only 20 games NHL experience between them, and both of whom are caught in the offensive zone more than their own.
    Aug. 28, 2016 at 3:32 p.m.
    #2
    DirtyDangles
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 13,508
    Likes: 3,060
    Little scored 1 less point in 15 less games...
    Aug. 28, 2016 at 3:49 p.m.
    #3
    Boojets
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 658
    Likes: 30
    Quoting: Jded
    I don't get it.. Rakell and Lindholm both fill needs for the Ducks, why trade them for this? Little is in his prime, yet scored less than Raks who is sill young and improving (not to mention Raks will not cost $4.7m). And then Lindholm - likely the Duck's #1 Dman for the next decade - is going for a 4th liner, prospect, and pick. The Ducks have an aging core and are trying to win now. How does this achieve that at all?

    The D core is so thinned that you have Montour and Theo playing together, who - despite great potential - have only 20 games NHL experience between them, and both of whom are caught in the offensive zone more than their own.

    Ducks thin Dcore? That is actually so wrong its funny. Connor is more than a prospect if playing with Gretz and Perry probably scores 20-25 goals as a rookie. Little is a number center last 5 years and scores really well at even strength (where the ducks struggled last year). Ducks need forward depth its what they are lacking this helps. They have no issues on the back end. (2nd best defensive team last year). They need to score more this trade helps them do that. And keeps their budget in line.
    Aug. 28, 2016 at 8:25 p.m.
    #4
    F50marco
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,570
    Likes: 6,714
    It could work. Personally if I were Anaheim I would want a little more insurance in regards to 2 things before I could officially say yes to this deal. One would be to see how Connor would do in his first season before taking him and two, see where that pick ends up. For me if Connor shows 100% he's NHL ready and that 1st rounder is guaranteed to be a lottery pick, than I think you might have a deal. The most important part for me is the 1st rounder. If it isn't a lottery pick than I'm declining.
    Aug. 28, 2016 at 9:15 p.m.
    #5
    Boojets
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 658
    Likes: 30
    Quoting: F50marco
    It could work. Personally if I were Anaheim I would want a little more insurance in regards to 2 things before I could officially say yes to this deal. One would be to see how Connor would do in his first season before taking him and two, see where that pick ends up. For me if Connor shows 100% he's NHL ready and that 1st rounder is guaranteed to be a lottery pick, than I think you might have a deal. The most important part for me is the 1st rounder. If it isn't a lottery pick than I'm declining.


    Connors season last year is a much better indication and versy season who everyone went nuts over.
    See All