SalarySwishSalarySwish

Shedding more vets for assets

Created by: ChrisPy97
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 24, 2021
Published: May 24, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I actually think the Ducks are in a really good place for a rebuild - save for perhaps their poor goaltender, who you wish was 3 years younger so his prime would last longer and occur more conveniently.

While some vets (Getzlaf) are set to (probably) leave, others (Silfverberg) might not be as valuable anymore as trade pieces, but some (Rakell) still could net some decent returns. Plus they could keep just enough quality vets (Fowler) to foster the young kids.

Finally, I may be way off base, and I know he's 29 and hardly a spring chicken, but I think Granlund is a perfect UFA for Anaheim to grab this offseason. He can play throughout the top 6 where they need him to, he offers experience, and he will be better than Henrique without costing as much money. He provides a bit of a buffer for some of the younger players I think, plus he'll get way more opportunities especially if he's moved back to center. I also think the trades and signings below give them enough cap space over the next few years to re-sign their RFAs, while providing some short term trade chips who can - in the mean time - help out throughout the lineup.

Here's just an idea from an outside observer looking in.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$2,000,000
3$4,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$3,000,000
1$900,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
ANA
    Protection List:
    Lundeström, Terry, Jones, Steel, Silfverberg, Rakell, Heinen
    Manson, Fowler, Lindholm
    Gibson
    SEA
    1. Volkov, Alexander [RFA Rights]
    2.
    ANA
    1. Neal, James
    2. 2021 4th round pick (EDM)
    3. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
    Additional Details:
    Lots of cap space, maybe acts a good 3C behind their 2 gods. Plus they save almost $4 million of cap in this trade with the retention
    EDM
    1. Henrique, Adam ($1,825,000 retained)
    Additional Details:
    I had a 1st Rd. pick in here from Edmonton first but idk if there's enough value going the other way. Lmk if you disagree
    3.
    ANA
    1. Phillips, Matthew [RFA Rights]
    2. Simon, Dominik [RFA Rights]
    3. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
    4.
    ANA
    1. Tippett, Owen
    2. 2021 2nd round pick (FLA)
    3. 2022 3rd round pick (FLA)
    5.
    ANA
    1. Niku, Sami
    2. 2022 3rd round pick (CBJ)
    WPG
    1. Manson, Josh
    2. 2021 5th round pick (EDM)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2022
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the CBJ
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NSH
    2023
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    26$81,500,000$61,104,167$0$2,682,500$20,395,833
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $822,500$822,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    $800,000$800,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,602,778$2,602,778
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $773,889$773,889
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
    $750,000$750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    $900,000$900,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $894,167$894,167 ($0$0$0$0)
    RW
    RFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    May 24, 2021 at 2:31 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 2,088
    Likes: 686
    Flames decline
    Lenny7 liked this.
    May 24, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.
    #2
    Sens Sicko from '06
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 519
    Likes: 279
    Quoting: flamesfan
    Flames decline


    Yeah this was the one I had the least confidence in. I was just looking for teams that could use an extra top 6 or top 9 winger, and the easiest choice was LA, but no WAY Anaheim does any deal with LA I don't think
    Lenny7 liked this.
    May 24, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
    #3
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    I don't know...I don't think you really worry about Rico at this point. Not a ton of point doing all of this just to make the lateral move of getting Granlund IMO. Edmonton could probably just buyout Neal, and get Granlund themselves if they really wanted to.

    I'd love to get a bit of value out of Silfverberg, but don't see it happening without retention.

    I feel like Rakell likely gets a 1st+so/so prospect instead of Tippett+2nd+3rd. Tippett seems like a playoff-type player, where it's more valuable to bang and crash, so I'd assume the Panthers would prefer to hold onto him.

    I'd prefer to get a 2nd+meh prospect for Manson if we're intent on moving him. Personally, I'd rather keep him to eat up some of the dirty minutes so we can actually ease Drysdale in, as opposed to throwing him to the wolves like we did this year. I'd also assume it's one of him, Shatty or Fleury who ends up going in the expansion draft. Stolarz would be a wildcard pick, but is still more likely to get picked than Volkov, IMO.
    ChrisPy97 and OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 24, 2021 at 2:49 p.m.
    #4
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: ChrisPy97
    Yeah this was the one I had the least confidence in. I was just looking for teams that could use an extra top 6 or top 9 winger, and the easiest choice was LA, but no WAY Anaheim does any deal with LA I don't think


    It'd be interesting to see who he has on his NTC too. A lot of guys have the Canadian teams on there to avoid the high income tax rates.
    ChrisPy97 liked this.
    May 24, 2021 at 3:15 p.m.
    #5
    Sens Sicko from '06
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 519
    Likes: 279
    Quoting: Lenny7
    I don't know...I don't think you really worry about Rico at this point. Not a ton of point doing all of this just to make the lateral move of getting Granlund IMO. Edmonton could probably just buyout Neal, and get Granlund themselves if they really wanted to.

    I'd love to get a bit of value out of Silfverberg, but don't see it happening without retention.

    I feel like Rakell likely gets a 1st+so/so prospect instead of Tippett+2nd+3rd. Tippett seems like a playoff-type player, where it's more valuable to bang and crash, so I'd assume the Panthers would prefer to hold onto him.

    I'd prefer to get a 2nd+meh prospect for Manson if we're intent on moving him. Personally, I'd rather keep him to eat up some of the dirty minutes so we can actually ease Drysdale in, as opposed to throwing him to the wolves like we did this year. I'd also assume it's one of him, Shatty or Fleury who ends up going in the expansion draft. Stolarz would be a wildcard pick, but is still more likely to get picked than Volkov, IMO.


    All great points! Totally understand

    I think there's a bit more value and potential to Tippett maybe - I see him as a maybe better Patric Hörnqvist-type player, in which case he could fit in the top 6 of most teams. I also think since Florida already has Hörnqvist himself as well as Denisenko, that Rakell is an upgrade they can afford.

    I'm not sure Manson is worth that much, although I can understand wanting it. He just hasn't been able to show enough the past two years, at very little fault of his own. I think they should keep Fleury or at least make room for younger D so I would keep one of him or Shattenkirk. On that note I based the Volkov decision on my own opinion plus a couple mock drafts done by some pros. It's almost impossible to predict these things, but with the amount of quality defense out there I think they're more likely to take more swings at young forwards who might do better with increased opportunity, like Volkov. I also always forget how there were just some nothing picks (Methot, Berube) that barely had any roster impact at all. So who the heck knows lol.
    Lenny7 liked this.
    See All