SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blackhawks 2017-2018

Created by: HawksFan28
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 18, 2017
Published: Jan. 18, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,750,000
2$1,750,000
3$1,750,000
Trades
CHI
    Expansion Draft LV
    WPG
    1. Krüger, Marcus
    Additional Details:
    Expansion Draft LV
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2019
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2020
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$75,500,000$68,778,128$3,558,000$1,015,000$6,721,872
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $863,333$863,333
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    $4,550,000$4,550,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $2,625,000$2,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    $5,275,000$5,275,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $700,000$700,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $700,000$700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
    LW
    UFA - 3
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $5,538,462$5,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    G
    UFA - 4
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    $825,000$825,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $872,500$872,500
    LD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    Jan. 19, 2017 at 9:43 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,148
    Likes: 199
    Cap seems high especially after the last two years of small (1.6 and 1.4) cap rises.
    You also forgot nearly $3.5 million in bonus overages.
    Jan. 19, 2017 at 9:51 a.m.
    #2
    Go Blues!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 221
    Likes: 1
    I would see Darling as the one lost in expansion too.
    Jan. 19, 2017 at 10:59 a.m.
    #3
    HawksFan28
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 1,076
    Likes: 138
    Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
    Cap seems high especially after the last two years of small (1.6 and 1.4) cap rises.
    You also forgot nearly $3.5 million in bonus overages.


    The overages aren't a sure thing. Panarin didn't make the All-Star team which was one of his bonus'. He's going to have to finsh top 10 in scoring or win hardware to meet the others...

    Campbell is owed 750k already in bonus'.

    As far as the cap - it's going to have to go up - 75% of the league seems to be pushing the upper limits of the cap.

    And I don't need explainations on how the cap works, I know how it works - doesn't mean it's sustainable tho (which is why we continue to have lockouts).

    Some options are:

    1. The cap is going to have to be raised.

    or

    2. The cap floor would have to be significantly raised.

    3. Teams would have to get more compliance buyouts (the NHLPA would never allow that).

    4. Teams would have to get some sort of creative cap relief.

    I don't really want to debate the cap tho - not until we know what the cap is going to look like...... My guess is as good as anyones for right now.

    What I do know is - the cap continues to have problems because it's design is extremely flawed which is why we continue to have these lockouts.
    Jan. 19, 2017 at 11:04 a.m.
    #4
    HawksFan28
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 1,076
    Likes: 138
    Quoting: JFo
    I would see Darling as the one lost in expansion too.


    Why would they waste a pick on Darling when he's an UFA?

    If they want him why don't they just sign him?

    I mean I could see the Hawks re-signing him rather soon, giving him a NMC for 1 year to protect him while exposing one of our goalies in Rockford.

    Or if the Hawks can't come to terms, Las Vegas could just sign him. However, since he's a UFA, taking his rights (which would only be a month) would be a waste of a pick.
    Jan. 19, 2017 at 1:29 p.m.
    #5
    Go Blues!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 221
    Likes: 1
    Quoting: HawksFan28
    Quoting: JFo
    I would see Darling as the one lost in expansion too.


    Why would they waste a pick on Darling when he's an UFA?

    If they want him why don't they just sign him?

    I mean I could see the Hawks re-signing him rather soon, giving him a NMC for 1 year to protect him while exposing one of our goalies in Rockford.

    Or if the Hawks can't come to terms, Las Vegas could just sign him. However, since he's a UFA, taking his rights (which would only be a month) would be a waste of a pick.

    That's not how the expansion draft works: one goalie from every nhl team on their nhl roster must be exposed
    See All