Constructive feedback please

@Trickster @onex

My constructive criticism is that the Leafs do not need/want a player like Dunn. We have Rielly and the saviour Sandin. Especially getting rid of Holl to make this happen this team can't get more soft.

I dont think that package is enough for Dunn and I don't feel like the Leafs need Dunn unless they plan on moving Rielly.

I think a 2nd is too much for Namestnikov. Personally I think Mikheyev is better.

Interesting trade with Detroit. I think Namestnikov is an upgrade on Mikheyev but I think a 2nd would be an overpay. Detroit maybe accepts the deal 1 for 1 or with a lower round pick added IMO. Namestnikov can play that defensive role on the third line while providing some offense together with Kase.

The defense unfortunately is horrible. Will get caved in against teams playing heavier hockey. You would have to add one really good defensive defenseman into that lineup at least.

Really 21 man roster don't work. But I think this is so much love for other teams players. As bad as Mikheyev hands were around the net last season, Namestnikov was no better. Mikheyev is a fine grinder and defensive player. I just don't think it's good 1 for 1 trade for the Leafs never mind the Leafs giving up a second.
Dunn, isn't that special. I don't know why so many have so little respect for Holl. Keeping Holl and Mikeheyev gives the Leafs enough cap for 22 man roster. Plus they keep to keep two prospects, a third and Dermot...who might be the odd man due to cap.
I like Sandin and Liljegren and think they will fine NHL careers. Not sure if I want them to be a starting pair though in October.