SalarySwishSalarySwish

Revisiting Miller

Created by: NMAvsFan
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 14, 2022
Published: Feb. 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Any interest here from Vancouver? Is the package good enough to get you to bite or are there other pieces you want? You're getting quantity to both make the money work and because Miller has an extra year which is enticing to the Avs but are you high enough on Barron and happy enough with the 1st to feel like you got a good deal?
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,268,963$1,741,463$3,350,000$231,037
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Feb. 14, 2022 at 3:35 p.m.
#1
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
my guess would be 1st, 2nd, and helleson. or 1st, 1st, helleson with retention.
NMAvsFan liked this.
Feb. 14, 2022 at 3:38 p.m.
#2
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 3,740
Quoting: DirtyDangle
my guess would be 1st, 2nd, and helleson. or 1st, 1st, helleson with retention.


I thought about something like that, too. But I'd think they would prefer to not retain given that he has another year but maybe they would do that rather than take on JTC. Why do you think they'd rather have Helleson? I know he's maybe ranked a little higher by some but he seems to have more upside and potential than Helleson.
Feb. 14, 2022 at 3:43 p.m.
#3
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: NMAvsFan
I thought about something like that, too. But I'd think they would prefer to not retain given that he has another year but maybe they would do that rather than take on JTC. Why do you think they'd rather have Helleson? I know he's maybe ranked a little higher by some but he seems to have more upside and potential than Helleson.


i think helleson is probably the best prospect the avs are willing to move. teams very rarely move their top prospect anymore so i expect the avs to keep barron and maybe olausson.
NMAvsFan liked this.
Feb. 14, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
#4
No regretzkys
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 816
Likes: 394
It's quite a bit coming back to Van in terms of quantity.
Just not sure if they are the right pieces.
The 2023 pick isn't great because plenty of other teams would get them a 2022 pick.
If I was Van I would rather get a 2022 1st and a better prospect. That might be just me
NMAvsFan liked this.
Feb. 14, 2022 at 3:51 p.m.
#5
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 3,740
Quoting: MadLin27
It's quite a bit coming back to Van in terms of quantity.
Just not sure if they are the right pieces.
The 2023 pick isn't great because plenty of other teams would get them a 2022 pick.
If I was Van I would rather get a 2022 1st and a better prospect. That might be just me


Yeah, I know they'd rather have the pick be for this year but that's what the extra guys are for in some ways because Kaut is NHL ready and cheap while Ranta has high upside while also being young and cheap. Barron is a pretty good prospect and is NHL ready. He could become a 3-4 guy pretty readily plus he is also young and cheap. So, the Canucks get a lot of cost-controlled young players under contract plus the 1st and, in this scenario, a guy (Compher) that can play multiple positions up and down the lineup and only has one year left on his deal so they can cut him loose if they don't like him. It'll be interesting to see if he goes and, if so, what the return is.
MadLin27 liked this.
See All