SalarySwishSalarySwish

Next Season Flat Cap

Created by: NateElder12
Team: 2017-18 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 6, 2017
Published: Jun. 6, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
With the injuries to the Ducks blue line I'm thinking that the chances are high the Ducks would rather give up picks/prospects than to lose anyone in expansion or trade a player to another team. Do you think this package of picks is enough to make Vegas not take a key player?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Welinski, Andy
  2. 2017 3rd round pick (ANA)
2.
ANA
VGK
  1. Etem, Emerson
  2. 2017 2nd round pick (ANA)
  3. 2018 1st round pick (ANA)
  4. 2018 3rd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
To not select Silfverberg, Manson, or Vatanen.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2018
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2019
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$62,238,137$0$850,000$10,761,863

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 1
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 1
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166
C, LW
RFA - 4
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$637,500$637,500
RW, C
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$670,000$670,000
RW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 3
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$2,437,500$2,437,500
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 6, 2017 at 12:57 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 910
Likes: 208
I would love to have Thompson back with us. Also, we need to trade a d-man and get some help up front.

Everyone will be better next year: Montour, Manson, Theodore, Kase, Ritchie, Rakell, Silfverberg.

Buying out Stoner isn't a solution, he can help us on the back end if healthy. Dump Despres and trade Vatanen and get in a top 6 forward who can score and this team might be first in the pacific again.
NateElder12 liked this.
Jun. 6, 2017 at 1:02 p.m.
#2
Kiekenapp
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 494
Likes: 16
Nate, you're pretty smart when it comes to hockey knowledge, but from what i have been reading and watching via interviews is that Mcphee says that he won't attack the Ducks much. I'm thinking he takes Kerdiles, and or Eaves. We may have to give them a little bit of compensation but i honestly feel that is overkill. I'm thinking Mcphee is being nice to us since they are close to us, and wants to build a good relationship with Bob Murray in the future.
NateElder12 liked this.
Jun. 6, 2017 at 1:40 p.m.
#3
NateElder12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 5,736
Likes: 801
Quoting: awatt
I would love to have Thompson back with us. Also, we need to trade a d-man and get some help up front.

Everyone will be better next year: Montour, Manson, Theodore, Kase, Ritchie, Rakell, Silfverberg.

Buying out Stoner isn't a solution, he can help us on the back end if healthy. Dump Despres and trade Vatanen and get in a top 6 forward who can score and this team might be first in the pacific again.


See I disagree on some of this. The Ducks don't need to trade anyone right now. Thompson isn't bringing anything to the lineup that isn't depicted above. Steel can score and Kapanen can kill penalties/play defense. Stoner buyout was necessary to be under the cap when Lindholm/Vatanen come back. Nobody is going to take Despres unless you give up something significant. I get what you are saying and appreciate the input but I don't think they need to panic as much as people think right now. The core is shifting and is pretty young. Guys like Silfverberg, Rakell, Steel, Montour, Lindholm, Manson, Vatanen, etc. will be able to take over for the older guys soon enough and at that point maybe move one of them for forward help when the exact need is more known.

Quoting: Kiekenapp
Nate, you're pretty smart when it comes to hockey knowledge, but from what i have been reading and watching via interviews is that Mcphee says that he won't attack the Ducks much. I'm thinking he takes Kerdiles, and or Eaves. We may have to give them a little bit of compensation but i honestly feel that is overkill. I'm thinking Mcphee is being nice to us since they are close to us, and wants to build a good relationship with Bob Murray in the future.


Interesting. I didn't know Vegas and Murray had talked - at least I haven't seen it yet. I understand I overpaid, but mainly because I figured the Ducks would have to in order to keep the whole team together. I don't think trading a hurt defenseman for forward help is the right thing to do RIGHT NOW. Maybe after the first month or so once they see how some of the internal talent is doing they could go that route and maybe even get more if they move a player closer to coming back form injury. Thanks for the input.
Jun. 6, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
#4
Kiekenapp
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 494
Likes: 16
Quoting: NateElder12
Quoting: awatt
I would love to have Thompson back with us. Also, we need to trade a d-man and get some help up front.

Everyone will be better next year: Montour, Manson, Theodore, Kase, Ritchie, Rakell, Silfverberg.

Buying out Stoner isn't a solution, he can help us on the back end if healthy. Dump Despres and trade Vatanen and get in a top 6 forward who can score and this team might be first in the pacific again.


See I disagree on some of this. The Ducks don't need to trade anyone right now. Thompson isn't bringing anything to the lineup that isn't depicted above. Steel can score and Kapanen can kill penalties/play defense. Stoner buyout was necessary to be under the cap when Lindholm/Vatanen come back. Nobody is going to take Despres unless you give up something significant. I get what you are saying and appreciate the input but I don't think they need to panic as much as people think right now. The core is shifting and is pretty young. Guys like Silfverberg, Rakell, Steel, Montour, Lindholm, Manson, Vatanen, etc. will be able to take over for the older guys soon enough and at that point maybe move one of them for forward help when the exact need is more known.

Quoting: Kiekenapp
Nate, you're pretty smart when it comes to hockey knowledge, but from what i have been reading and watching via interviews is that Mcphee says that he won't attack the Ducks much. I'm thinking he takes Kerdiles, and or Eaves. We may have to give them a little bit of compensation but i honestly feel that is overkill. I'm thinking Mcphee is being nice to us since they are close to us, and wants to build a good relationship with Bob Murray in the future.


Interesting. I didn't know Vegas and Murray had talked - at least I haven't seen it yet. I understand I overpaid, but mainly because I figured the Ducks would have to in order to keep the whole team together. I don't think trading a hurt defenseman for forward help is the right thing to do RIGHT NOW. Maybe after the first month or so once they see how some of the internal talent is doing they could go that route and maybe even get more if they move a player closer to coming back form injury. Thanks for the input.


That is where i disagree with you. I think regardless of the expansion draft i think the ducks are trading Vatanen in the next year or 2 years because of the pay raises Manson, Montour, and Theodore will command. Also with Fowler getting an extension and with Bieksa 4 MIL cap hit and Stoner cap hit will fall off. I still think moving Vatanen will help the team get a top6 forward that is direly needed.
Jun. 6, 2017 at 8:29 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 423
Likes: 59
You could probably give up about half the assets to ask LV to take a specific player rather then to "not take" players. The rumor is a first to take Staal from NYR. You could ask LV to do something similar with Stoner or Despres.
See All