SalarySwishSalarySwish

TBL one more add

Created by: JTBF81
Team: 2023-24 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 18, 2023
Published: Jul. 18, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Niederreiter, Nino ($2,000,000 retained)
WPG
  1. Fortier, Gabriel
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (TBL)
  3. 2026 5th round pick (TBL)
2.
TBL
    Chicago retains an additional 33% of Niederreiter's contract. Any team works here though.
    CHI
    1. 2025 5th round pick (TBL)
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MIN
    2025
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    2026
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$83,500,000$84,052,500$0$0-$552,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $6,250,000$6,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    C, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,665,000$2,665,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,125,000$1,125,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,200,000$5,200,000
    RD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $762,500$762,500
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    Jul. 18, 2023 at 1:47 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 1,130
    Likes: 1,469
    Not sure if anyoneone would spend 1.32 million to buy a 5th round pick, but it won't be the Hawks who own way to many better picks in the next couple drafts and would not burn their 2nd of 3 retention slots for that.
    Jul. 18, 2023 at 2:08 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 2,570
    Likes: 566
    Quoting: wojohawk
    Not sure if anyoneone would spend 1.32 million to buy a 5th round pick, but it won't be the Hawks who own way to many better picks in the next couple drafts and would not burn their 2nd of 3 retention slots for that.


    It would be 667k for a 5th. At absolute best, to any team, it should be a 4th, but a 5th is definitely in range, especially talking just one season of retention. The retention slot is a factor,but the value is in line.
    Jul. 18, 2023 at 2:17 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 1,130
    Likes: 1,469
    Edited Jul. 18, 2023 at 2:25 p.m.
    Quoting: JTBF81
    It would be 667k for a 5th. At absolute best, to any team, it should be a 4th, but a 5th is definitely in range, especially talking just one season of retention. The retention slot is a factor,but the value is in line.


    Ohhh....you mean 33% after Winnnipeg retains half. Yes the value is fair, but I still doubt Hawks would have any interest. First, that 5th would be the 16th highest pick in the next 2 draft for the Hawks. Burning a 2nd retention slot when the Hawks have 2 left and a bunch of pending UFA's with significant cap hits to potentially move at the deadline for in theory higher picks is not ideal. Last, with the Hawks holding the Tampa 1st, the last thing they should be doing is helping them in any way field a better team.

    I would guess someone will retain that for a 4th/or 5th....just doubt it is the Hawks.
    Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Jul. 18, 2023 at 2:18 p.m.
    #4
    WPGSK
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 576
    Likes: 232
    WPG says... NO.
    Jul. 18, 2023 at 2:27 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 2,570
    Likes: 566
    Quoting: wojohawk
    Ohhh....you mean 33% after Winnnipeg retains half. Yes the value is fair, but I still doubt Hawks would have any interest. First, that 5th would be the 16th highest pick in the next 2 draft for the Hawks. Burning a 2nd retention slot when the Hawks have 2 left and a bunch of pending UFA's with significant cap hits to potentially move at the deadline for in theory higher picks is not ideal. Last, with the Hawks holding the Tampa 1st, the last thing they should be doing is helping them in any way field a better team.

    I would guess someone will retain that for a 4th/or 5th....just doubt it is the Hawks.


    Yes, it was my error on the wording/placement of the trade parameters. I went ahead and adjusted it.
    See All