SalarySwishSalarySwish

Let's say it works

Created by: DD67
Team: 2016-17 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2016
Published: Feb. 28, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Possible to take Schultz to arbitration and retain. But cap raise would have to be what was reported earlier.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$750,000
2$650,000
2$3,500,000
Retained Salary Transactions
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$74,000,000$70,974,474$0$1,330,000$3,025,526
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW
UFA - 3
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$6,800,000$6,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 9
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 2
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$667,500$667,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$700,833$700,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
$692,500$692,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 6
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
$3,300,000$3,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
$628,333$628,333 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
G
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Feb. 28, 2016 at 12:14 p.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,903
Likes: 23,458
The other option is if not happy with Schultz's potential RFA value, let him walk. Spend the 3.5m on another Dman.
Feb. 28, 2016 at 12:44 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 332
Likes: 13
Quoting: palhal
The other option is if not happy with Schultz's potential RFA value, let him walk. Spend the 3.5m on another Dman.


Exactly. Low risk move.
See All