SalarySwishSalarySwish

Would moving Mathews work? Knights reunion.

Created by: Davisoc
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 31, 2018
Published: Jul. 31, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
So, I am not saying moving Mathews it smart, or even the right move. My idea behind it is simple, why cap crunch so hard on this core, when we could make it work for us.

If the value isn't right, please give me a counter proposal, reading "no" or so and so hangs up, is annoying. Just give me your honest opinion and what you think is fair. I want a conversation.

My goal is to have the OHL Knights first line reunion back when Marner was there.

Bridge deal for Nylander to buy the leafs time to get Marleau off the books before his big pay raise.

Give bridge deals to Dvorak (2/3 @ 2-3mill), bridge for Tkachuk (3-4 @ 3-4mill).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Keller, Clayton
  2. Leivo, Josh
  3. 2019 4th round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$79,500,000$66,347,500$2,550,000$3,612,500$13,152,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW
UFA - 6
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$839,167$839,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 31, 2018 at 9:03 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 763
Ekman-Larsson is a LD but I’m not sure if he’d be able to play on his off side. Don’t think the value is terrible on the ARI trade leafs might have to add a pick or another prospect to seal the deal. Honestly if the leafs are able to acquire Keller I’d keep him. Kid looks like he’ll be a 80+ point player especially playing with Tavares. But if you want Tkachuk I think Keller for Tkachuk 1for1 could work.
Jul. 31, 2018 at 9:09 a.m.
#2
Wannabe Leafs GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 307
Quoting: Mike7856
Ekman-Larsson is a LD but I’m not sure if he’d be able to play on his off side. Don’t think the value is terrible on the ARI trade leafs might have to add a pick or another prospect to seal the deal. Honestly if the leafs are able to acquire Keller I’d keep him. Kid looks like he’ll be a 80+ point player especially playing with Tavares. But if you want Tkachuk I think Keller for Tkachuk 1for1 could work.


I know that isn't EOL normal side, I was just putting him there for now. As for Keller I was thinking the same thing I just didn't know if people shared my enthusiasm for Keller. The big reason for Tkachuk is to add back some of the grit we lost from losing Leo and Matt, but also reuniting that line that was silly in the O. As for the slight over pay, its because the Flames arent shopping him, so I thought we would have to give up more to wrestle him away.
Mike7856 liked this.
Jul. 31, 2018 at 9:25 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,028
Likes: 7,744
The Matthews line was the best in the league last year based on goal differential per 60. Why destroy that just to unite a line that worked against 17-year-olds?
Jul. 31, 2018 at 9:49 a.m.
#4
Wannabe Leafs GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 307
Quoting: CD282
The Matthews line was the best in the league last year based on goal differential per 60. Why destroy that just to unite a line that worked against 17-year-olds?


The point was more so to save on cap, get a legit stud defender and bring in a line with massive potential. Again, it was just for a fun what if scenario.

To quote my description, "So, I am not saying moving Mathews it smart, or even the right move. My idea behind it is simple, why cap crunch so hard on this core, when we could make it work for us."
Jul. 31, 2018 at 10:02 a.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,501
Likes: 22,667
Why do you think Matthews is cap crunch and then waste 8.5m on OEL?
CD282 liked this.
See All