SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mostly call ups so fit Tavares

Created by: Oiler3535
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 9, 2018
Published: Jan. 9, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This can work, especially if get rid of a few contracts summer of 19. I’ve done the math, and if remove Marleau (robidas island), and cap goes up a bit, can pay Matthews 13, Marner 7, and Gardiner 6 and use young guys on D, and just have 4th liners to sign or call up. Will work.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
8$7,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$10,000,000
17/18 rookie bonus, Cap overage
1$5,200,000
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$78,000,000$76,420,833$2,550,000$4,550,000$1,579,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 6
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
17/18 rookie bonus, Cap overage
$5,200,000$5,200,000
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 9, 2018 at 11:58 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 285
Likes: 24
Dont see how it would work the following year with extensions to Marner and Matthews
Wings1 liked this.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 12:12 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 6,090
Likes: 1,640
don't u have to be injured to put marleau on ltir? u cant trade him either because he has ntc and nmc in his contract
clark liked this.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 12:41 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 984
Likes: 90
Quoting: nikeBauer4411
Dont see how it would work the following year with extensions to Marner and Matthews


It would if cap goes up even at low end of Bettmans estimate. Look in my explanation.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 12:43 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 984
Likes: 90
Quoting: Price_is_the_goat
don't u have to be injured to put marleau on ltir? u cant trade him either because he has ntc and nmc in his contract


As I say, Robidas Island. He’ll be told he’s injured like lupul and robidas were. The contract was structured that way deliberately so that he’s only earning a bit over 1 million the 19/20 season. Bob McKenzie et all said when he signed that it was really a massive 2 year deal and that he will retire after 2 years. 3rd year for cap purposes only.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 12:47 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 6,090
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Oiler3535
As I say, Robidas Island. He’ll be told he’s injured like lupul and robidas were. The contract was structured that way deliberately so that he’s only earning a bit over 1 million the 19/20 season. Bob McKenzie et all said when he signed that it was really a massive 2 year deal and that he will retire after 2 years. 3rd year for cap purposes only.


lmao u cant gaurentee that he'll just retire. pretty classy move by the organization if they plan to part ways with him like that.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 1:14 p.m.
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,902
Likes: 23,458
Silly to think Marleau is going to LTIR himself when he has a change to win a Cup. He left his home in California for reason, to play that third year with a contender, not to satisfy the Leafs cap situation. Either way his cap hit is 6.25m regardless his actually salary. That is the cap works, not so guys can post rosters with Tavares on their team.
And the cap doesn't really work. If the Leafs are to have no performance bonus carryover in 2019/20 when they really need all space availabem they have to include that 4,55m that is shown above in the 2019/20 cap. It isn't now. Also Horton's 5.25m salary has to be included in the opening day roster, or else the there isn't room to include the bonus performance for 2019/20. And even if Marleau was LTIRed his salary has to included in the opening day roster for performance bonuses reasons.
And as suggested by others, how do you cut salary in 2019/20 when Marner, Matthews and other expect raises.
Sorry, when following the cap rules and expectations, having Tavares even at a low end of his salary expectations, doesn't work for the Leafs.
clark liked this.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 1:32 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
On the open market John Tavares will easily command around $11 million to $12 million per he's not coming home to Toronto to play 2nd fiddle to Auston Matthews. It's been widely reported that if Taares goes to free agency he wants to go to a team where he can be a #1C not happening in Toronto. Matthews 13M Marner Nylander 7M each Tavares 12M good luck not being in cap hell for the foreseeable future. If you're going to spend million more do it upgrading your D not spending more money on your forward core.
clark and Price_is_the_goat liked this.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 1:59 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 984
Likes: 90
Quoting: palhal
Silly to think Marleau is going to LTIR himself when he has a change to win a Cup. He left his home in California for reason, to play that third year with a contender, not to satisfy the Leafs cap situation. Either way his cap hit is 6.25m regardless his actually salary. That is the cap works, not so guys can post rosters with Tavares on their team.
And the cap doesn't really work. If the Leafs are to have no performance bonus carryover in 2019/20 when they really need all space availabem they have to include that 4,55m that is shown above in the 2019/20 cap. It isn't now. Also Horton's 5.25m salary has to be included in the opening day roster, or else the there isn't room to include the bonus performance for 2019/20. And even if Marleau was LTIRed his salary has to included in the opening day roster for performance bonuses reasons.
And as suggested by others, how do you cut salary in 2019/20 when Marner, Matthews and other expect raises.
Sorry, when following the cap rules and expectations, having Tavares even at a low end of his salary expectations, doesn't work for the Leafs.


I’ve done the math. It works. And I trust BobbyMac more than you about Marleau. 76.45 million in 19/20 including everything I’ve said, and need 5 players. Even without clearing out the Horton hit as you insist is ‘necessary’. It isn’t.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 2:10 p.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,902
Likes: 23,458
Sorry to be correct , if he Marleau retires, the Leafs still has his cap hit of 6.25m in his third year. That is the meaning of plus 35 signings, so rich teams can't front load contracts and have minimum cap implications in the future.
That's what happened with Datsyuk.
Now I admit that if Marleau truly retires, the Leafs would be able to trade his cap hit with sweetener to "not near the cap team".
Jan. 9, 2018 at 2:24 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 984
Likes: 90
Quoting: palhal
Sorry to be correct , if he Marleau retires, the Leafs still has his cap hit of 6.25m in his third year. That is the meaning of plus 35 signings, so rich teams can't front load contracts and have minimum cap implications in the future.
That's what happened with Datsyuk.
Now I admit that if Marleau truly retires, the Leafs would be able to trade his cap hit with sweetener to "not near the cap team".


Again, he’s not going to officially retire. He will go to Robidas Island where he is ‘injured’ and still gets his salary but has minimal cap ramifications. But could easily trade his hit with a prospect to Arizona or the like.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 2:44 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 362
no use arguing with a guy who is so determine to fit a player into teams cap regardless of the rules of the cap or long term implications. robidas island, retirement, perf bonus, future signings. doesn't fitcry
Price_is_the_goat liked this.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 6:20 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 984
Likes: 90
Quoting: clark
no use arguing with a guy who is so determine to fit a player into teams cap regardless of the rules of the cap or long term implications. robidas island, retirement, perf bonus, future signings. doesn't fitcry


Fits no problem with an 82 million cap in 19/20, which is a low estimate according to Bettman.
Jan. 9, 2018 at 9:55 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 362
Quoting: Oiler3535
Fits no problem with an 82 million cap in 19/20, which is a low estimate according to Bettman.


when you ignores the rules of the salary cap it fits. enough said, but if it makes you happy.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll