SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Complete fail

Created by: habs_fan123
Team: 2017-18 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 26, 2018
Published: Jan. 26, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the LAK
2019
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$75,000,000$61,936,666$0$182,500$13,063,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 6
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 2
$4,900,000$4,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
$839,166$839,166
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$912,500$912,500
C
UFA - 1
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$725,000$725,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 2
$720,000$720,000
LW
RFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$6,500,000$6,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
$748,333$748,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 26, 2018 at 8:25 a.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,734
Likes: 23,354
I wish when folks make this Weber trade to the Leafs (cause he can't be traded to any other team) they would do it with the Leafs roster. Long term the Leafs within two years, can't afford Weber or even want to.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 8:53 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 556
Quoting: palhal
I wish when folks make this Weber trade to the Leafs (cause he can't be traded to any other team) they would do it with the Leafs roster. Long term the Leafs within two years, can't afford Weber or even want to.


Babcock has openly praised Weber and claimed he would take him on his team any day (or something to that degree without tampering). So its only natural that fans looking to sell said player pick your team all the time. It helps that Toronto is close to contending, and has a boat load of prospects that they could part with. Also, Leafs may not be able to afford him with the current roster in 2 years, but the roster can change, and "want to" is your personal opinion, not your managements (which you're entitled to of course, just pointing out parts of your organization my see differently). Also, Weber is still a great shutdown defenseman with a cannon.

I know this isn't your concern, but another common one is his contract. It isn't that bad when you consider the cap going up, and Nashville is on the hook for recapture penalties. If Chara can play well, into his 40s, I wouldn't be concerned with a 32 year old for now...


habs_fan123, why didn't you flip JVR, as he would bring in more assets? OR purpose an extension and deal Pacioretty (similar role)? Just curious.
Campa96 liked this.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 9:05 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 144
Quoting: RobbStark03
Babcock has openly praised Weber and claimed he would take him on his team any day (or something to that degree without tampering). So its only natural that fans looking to sell said player pick your team all the time. It helps that Toronto is close to contending, and has a boat load of prospects that they could part with. Also, Leafs may not be able to afford him with the current roster in 2 years, but the roster can change, and "want to" is your personal opinion, not your managements (which you're entitled to of course, just pointing out parts of your organization my see differently). Also, Weber is still a great shutdown defenseman with a cannon.

I know this isn't your concern, but another common one is his contract. It isn't that bad when you consider the cap going up, and Nashville is on the hook for recapture penalties. If Chara can play well, into his 40s, I wouldn't be concerned with a 32 year old for now...


habs_fan123, why didn't you flip JVR, as he would bring in more assets? OR purpose an extension and deal Pacioretty (similar role)? Just curious.


You and Pal, both make good points, but for the Leafs to be interested in anyway if the Canadiens are "preparing to sell", then they would need to eat some of the contract! If Weber's cap hit became something in and around $4M, I see them having a great deal of interest. It may not include Liljegren, but flipping JVR, a rental, a pick and a prospect, might make some sense, but I doubt Montreal would consider this!
Jan. 26, 2018 at 9:08 a.m.
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,734
Likes: 23,354
Quoting: RobbStark03
Babcock has openly praised Weber and claimed he would take him on his team any day (or something to that degree without tampering). So its only natural that fans looking to sell said player pick your team all the time. It helps that Toronto is close to contending, and has a boat load of prospects that they could part with. Also, Leafs may not be able to afford him with the current roster in 2 years, but the roster can change, and "want to" is your personal opinion, not your managements (which you're entitled to of course, just pointing out parts of your organization my see differently). Also, Weber is still a great shutdown defenseman with a cannon.

I know this isn't your concern, but another common one is his contract. It isn't that bad when you consider the cap going up, and Nashville is on the hook for recapture penalties. If Chara can play well, into his 40s, I wouldn't be concerned with a 32 year old for now...


habs_fan123, why didn't you flip JVR, as he would bring in more assets? OR purpose an extension and deal Pacioretty (similar role)? Just curious.


Babcock has enough class, to praise a player in public. But what does his comment have anything to do with a NHL trade? Absolutely nothing. And please, a few corrections. The Leafs don't have a lot prospects, most of them these prospects on the NHL team. Leafs really only have two prospects on the Marlies. Liljgren and Bracco, the rest...aren't real prospects. The Leafs are few years for contending, they just aren't that "contending good" yet. And most sorry to inform you, salary cap is important in making all trades. This nonsense about Nashville and the cap recapture. Might be important if Weber retires, but no team is going to trade for such a cap hit hoping he retires. Sure the cap is going up, but the Leafs have lots of young players that are going to get raises base on the new cap.
Seems like 95% of expensive Dmen trades go to the Leafs. Certainly not absolutely necessary for the Leafs. No the Leafs can't be a dumping ground for contracts because some teams just to want to get rid of them, and Webers is one. And as I wrote, try putting Weber in the Leafs lineup, with considering the Leafs performance bonuses. It just doesn't work. But again it too much work for almost every Montreal fan who makes the deal. We only see the Habs roster....kinda meaningless in the Leafs cap world.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 9:39 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 556
Quoting: palhal
Babcock has enough class, to praise a player in public. But what does his comment have anything to do with a NHL trade? Absolutely nothing. And please, a few corrections. The Leafs don't have a lot prospects, most of them these prospects on the NHL team. Leafs really only have two prospects on the Marlies. Liljgren and Bracco, the rest...aren't real prospects. The Leafs are few years for contending, they just aren't that "contending good" yet. And most sorry to inform you, salary cap is important in making all trades. This nonsense about Nashville and the cap recapture. Might be important if Weber retires, but no team is going to trade for such a cap hit hoping he retires. Sure the cap is going up, but the Leafs have lots of young players that are going to get raises base on the new cap.
Seems like 95% of expensive Dmen trades go to the Leafs. Certainly not absolutely necessary for the Leafs. No the Leafs can't be a dumping ground for contracts because some teams just to want to get rid of them, and Webers is one. And as I wrote, try putting Weber in the Leafs lineup, with considering the Leafs performance bonuses. It just doesn't work. But again it too much work for almost every Montreal fan who makes the deal. We only see the Habs roster....kinda meaningless in the Leafs cap world.


OR, Babcock likes him.... Crazy idea. Weber is one of the best shutdown defenseman and Babcock's team can't defend. Seems like that's exactly the type of defenseman he would want. Whether Lou/Shanny provide him with that is debatable.

Leafs Prospects: Liljegren, Bracco, Johnsson, Pickard, Kapanen, Leivo and Sosh. As much pine as Leivo rides, he is still a decent prospect with NHL upside. Sosh is injured and Kapanen is called up for now, both still prospects with NHL upside... Not to mention, all the pieces that just "graduated" over the last season and a half, the team is very young and could trade away young/prospect players.

Salary Cap is absolutely important. 10% of your contract for one of the best shutdown defensemen in the game is something Leafs could afford if they decide to. Habs fans aren't "dumping cap" on your team, we are trying to sell/rebuild our team. Weber to Toronto appears to be a fit, whether you agree or not.

We don't make "from the other teams prospective" deal for every fake trade we purpose, so why would we care to go through the work to show how Toronto could be happy with it.


Subban for Weber was a terrible trade for many reasons. But this bullshit opinion that 32 year old Weber is suddenly garbage or not worth his contract is laughable. We rebuilding, not throwing away bad deals.
lucasg liked this.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 10:04 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 307
Likes: 24
Quoting: palhal
Babcock has enough class, to praise a player in public. But what does his comment have anything to do with a NHL trade? Absolutely nothing. And please, a few corrections. The Leafs don't have a lot prospects, most of them these prospects on the NHL team. Leafs really only have two prospects on the Marlies. Liljgren and Bracco, the rest...aren't real prospects. The Leafs are few years for contending, they just aren't that "contending good" yet. And most sorry to inform you, salary cap is important in making all trades. This nonsense about Nashville and the cap recapture. Might be important if Weber retires, but no team is going to trade for such a cap hit hoping he retires. Sure the cap is going up, but the Leafs have lots of young players that are going to get raises base on the new cap.
Seems like 95% of expensive Dmen trades go to the Leafs. Certainly not absolutely necessary for the Leafs. No the Leafs can't be a dumping ground for contracts because some teams just to want to get rid of them, and Webers is one. And as I wrote, try putting Weber in the Leafs lineup, with considering the Leafs performance bonuses. It just doesn't work. But again it too much work for almost every Montreal fan who makes the deal. We only see the Habs roster....kinda meaningless in the Leafs cap world.


So the Leafs need a Top 4 RHD and they can't afford one for 7.8 mil? Good luck trying sign one. If they wanted Weber they can make trades and adjust there roster to do so. Can you see he Leafs keeping JVR, Bozak, Komarov, Or Hainsey? Also Marleau can be traded on his last year. Can't see the trade happening anyways unless Marner or Nylander is coming the other way which would save from Toronto having to sign one of them. Bergevin isn't going to give up Weber the guy he traded Subban for for hopeful prospects. His job is on the line.
Campa96 and RobbStark03 liked this.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 10:32 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 556
Quoting: Doug7004
You and Pal, both make good points, but for the Leafs to be interested in anyway if the Canadiens are "preparing to sell", then they would need to eat some of the contract! If Weber's cap hit became something in and around $4M, I see them having a great deal of interest. It may not include Liljegren, but flipping JVR, a rental, a pick and a prospect, might make some sense, but I doubt Montreal would consider this!


IF Weber is 4M a year for the duration of his contract, we'ld have 30 teams offering up more than Liljegren and a flip. Again, I don't see $7.8M as an issue for Weber, but if that's not something you want, I respect that.
Jan. 26, 2018 at 10:32 a.m.
#8
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,092
Quoting: palhal
Babcock has enough class, to praise a player in public. But what does his comment have anything to do with a NHL trade? Absolutely nothing. And please, a few corrections. The Leafs don't have a lot prospects, most of them these prospects on the NHL team. Leafs really only have two prospects on the Marlies. Liljgren and Bracco, the rest...aren't real prospects. The Leafs are few years for contending, they just aren't that "contending good" yet. And most sorry to inform you, salary cap is important in making all trades. This nonsense about Nashville and the cap recapture. Might be important if Weber retires, but no team is going to trade for such a cap hit hoping he retires. Sure the cap is going up, but the Leafs have lots of young players that are going to get raises base on the new cap.
Seems like 95% of expensive Dmen trades go to the Leafs. Certainly not absolutely necessary for the Leafs. No the Leafs can't be a dumping ground for contracts because some teams just to want to get rid of them, and Webers is one. And as I wrote, try putting Weber in the Leafs lineup, with considering the Leafs performance bonuses. It just doesn't work. But again it too much work for almost every Montreal fan who makes the deal. We only see the Habs roster....kinda meaningless in the Leafs cap world.


https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/110124

You're welcome
RobbStark03 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll