Molson beer is meh
Joined: Jan 2017
And I'm not trying to slight you in any way. But you do claim to have insider information. When someone does this 1 of 2 things have to be declared (not both) to legitimize your claims. 1) name your sources. 2) Show you're credentials.
so let's just say you are a reporter (just an example). your name would count as credentials to legitimize or make it believable that you can have internal sources. In this case, keeping your sources anonymous then becomes acceptable.
If you're an average fan and don't want people to know who you are, then the only way to legitimize you're claims is to name your sources. it's literally the only thing that makes your claims believable.
So if you have to keep your identity secret, and also keep you're sources anonymous. Then there's really no point at saying you have insider information at all. Because for all we know, you're just a guy making false claims for attention. You might not be, but I personally can't in good conscious believe you "heard something new" unless you can prove it.
Just my take on this. Not trying to offend.
A_K liked this.