It's all rentals' trades not just this one.

Again, you just don't realize how deep Bruins are in prospects. They HAD to get rid of some!! Bruins already win this trade easily

Bruins could afford to do this one and makes all rentals more expensive so not many teams will be able to do much to keep up with Bruins!!!

Nash chokes come playoffs, so if Boston does win the cup, i doubt he will have much to do with it

Dude be real. Look at a team in Tampa who dont trade futures for Rentals. They are stacked on the ice and in the cupboards, Boston lost this trade

Stop.

Don't feed the trolls

Rangers win the trade but i dont necessarily hate it for boston.

Enhance your calm. Nobody is insulting your team, they just gave up more than what some feel Nash is worth. It's about value, nothing more.

My job is done.

I'm sure you would, Rangers fan. I hate this so much...

Dude, Tampa is starting to slide......this is Bruins shot at keeping up!! Bruins are so loaded with young talent they can afford to lose a little....

haha....haters gonna hate

Truth

There's no "winners"......that is just crap created by idiots. Trades work for both teams. No winners or losers

stupid way to look at it but if that means Boston didnt lose the seguin trade, ill take it

This trade sucks for us. Sweeney was basically Gorton's ***** this deadline.

-A Bruins fan

He had to go, Bruins didn't like his attitude.....that was a deal that had to be made unfortunately

NY gets a pretty good return although Boston has lots of solid prospects so this may not hurt them long term too much, or at all. They give up their 1st but it would be a really low pick in that round so who knows. Nash is a great player even if he is in decline and sometimes a team has to make a bold move, so I do like it from Boston's perspective. I am hopeful that this forces other teams to make some interesting moves to keep up

Tell me why it sucks?

FINALLY!!!!!! Somebody that actually knows what they're talking about!!!! Good post Mount Royal 514!!!!

We get an old guy who we're not gonna re-sign. Rangers get Spooner, who's had a breakout year, plus a 1st. Already that's way too much for a pure rental. We shed Beleskey, but only 50% of him. And then throw in Lindgren, who could still be decent, and you get a really botched blockbuster.

Ok. An old guy that can still play/skate/and score, smart hockey player, veteran in the dressing room. A Canadian who has heart for the game (means more than you think). May re-sign but only at a lot cheaper, if he doesn't I won't lose sleep, they are making a move to try and win the cup NOW!!!! Understand that, there's not that much else out there!!!! Spooner having a good year but he was going to move anyway, Bruins don't have a spot for him for what he will command on the market. Jesus, do I really have to do this? the first is basically a second rounder. No guarantees down that far, plus Bruins are so deep in solid prospects it hurts (look at Providence (not many veterans playing there!!!!). Lindgren is a shut down D - we are already deep in that category. We get rid of Bels contract which EVERYONE hated and criticized (well half) and we only take on half of Nash's heavy contract!! Not a blockbuster but a trade that works for both teams, and remember, Bruins are taking a shot at the cup, why not!!?????? Jesus, some people just gonna hate......

Now they're going to have to put Ric. Nash and Ril. Nash on the jerseys. I love it.

Boston got fleeced.