SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who holds more value, Slavin or Hanifin?

Created by: NeedTheCleanser
Team: 2017-18 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 19, 2018
Published: Mar. 19, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
CAR and BUF have been linked as trade partners forever for obvious reasons.

I’m just wondering out loud, which LHD is more valuable? Hanifin has the higher ceiling, yet Slavin has been a really reliable guy against top competition. Does the presence of Jake Bean and Fleury change anything?

Is there a deal for either one that makes sense?

Just curious
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2019
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
29$75,000,000$59,764,524$0$6,850,000$15,235,476
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 6
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$625,000$625,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$5,600,000$5,600,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$1,475,000$1,475,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
$718,333$718,333 (Performance Bonus$60,000$60K)
RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
$670,000$670,000 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,142,857$5,142,857
RD
UFA - 3
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LD
UFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:40 p.m.
#1
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 4,332
I don't get to watch that many Canes games but I think of Slavin as the superior player. Part of it might be the subtle disappointment I see in Hanifin considering the early success of other picks in his draft. Not saying he was the wrong pick at the time, but he's been overtaken by Provorov, Werenksi, Chabot. Still a good player, but I'd build a team around Slavin before Hanifin.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:45 p.m.
#2
Log off the internet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,830
Likes: 3,866
Hanifin
Ragsandbluesfan liked this.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:46 p.m.
#3
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: A_K
I don't get to watch that many Canes games but I think of Slavin as the superior player. Part of it might be the subtle disappointment I see in Hanifin considering the early success of other picks in his draft. Not saying he was the wrong pick at the time, but he's been overtaken by Provorov, Werenksi, Chabot. Still a good player, but I'd build a team around Slavin before Hanifin.


Hes for sure better than slavin anfhasnt been overtaken by any of them he was an all star this season werenski has been in a sophomore slump all year, hes definitely been better than chabot all year, and provorov is debatable
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:51 p.m.
#4
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 4,332
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Hes for sure better than slavin anfhasnt been overtaken by any of them he was an all star this season werenski has been in a sophomore slump all year, hes definitely been better than chabot all year, and provorov is debatable


Werenski is still outscoring Hanifin (5v5 and all situations) despite what you're calling a sophomore slump. He's also trusted with almost 23 min per night vs Hanifin's 19ish. Could be a correlation with production:ice time, but I'd take the guy who earns the time. Provorov is the no. 1 on a playoff team, Hanifin is the no. 3 on a non-playoff team. Chabot has a higher offensive ceiling than Hanifin. I stand by my comment.
DirtyDangles liked this.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:52 p.m.
#5
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: A_K
Werenski is still outscoring Hanifin (5v5 and all situations) despite what you're calling a sophomore slump. He's also trusted with almost 23 min per night vs Hanifin's 19ish. Could be a correlation with production:ice time, but I'd take the guy who earns the time. Provorov is the no. 1 on a playoff team, Hanifin is the no. 3 on a non-playoff team. Chabot has a higher offensive ceiling than Hanifin. I stand by my comment.


Your opinion, fair enough.
A_K liked this.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:55 p.m.
#6
STH
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 373
Likes: 90
I can't see a reality where Salvin is available from a Canes standpoint. As a Canes homer he is just about as untouchable as Aho and is beloved by the fan base. It would take a massive overpayment for either of them though I would think Hanifin is more accessible to trade but it would cost a similarly aged/pedigree player (No not ROR.) The ask for either of them from BUF would start with Eichel as silly as I'm sure that sounds. The LD we would most be willing to trade are Fluery and Bean who both have top 4 potential. Idk why people **** on Fluery, he had a great year and made very little mistakes without having a real mentor to guide him as a rookie on a very young Canes D (literally our oldest D is 26.)
Mar. 19, 2018 at 1:58 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 460
Quoting: Rcsherwo
I can't see a reality where Salvin is available from a Canes standpoint. As a Canes homer he is just about as untouchable as Aho and is beloved by the fan base. It would take a massive overpayment for either of them though I would think Hanifin is more accessible to trade but it would cost a similarly aged/pedigree player (No not ROR.) The ask for either of them from BUF would start with Eichel as silly as I'm sure that sounds. The LD we would most be willing to trade are Fluery and Bean who both have top 4 potential. Idk why people **** on Fluery, he had a great year and made very little mistakes without having a real mentor to guide him as a rookie on a very young Canes D (literally our oldest D

Yeah... Eichel is not going to happen.... he is much more valuable than both of them
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:02 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 460
I’ve always thought that’s mittelstadt would be the price for Hanifin... I know that’s plasphemy but that’s what it probably costs
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:02 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 460
Quoting: Jbarre6
I’ve always thought that’s mittelstadt would be the price for Hanifin... I know that’s plasphemy but that’s what it probably costs


Blaphemy*
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:05 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1,512
Quoting: A_K
Werenski is still outscoring Hanifin (5v5 and all situations) despite what you're calling a sophomore slump. He's also trusted with almost 23 min per night vs Hanifin's 19ish. Could be a correlation with production:ice time, but I'd take the guy who earns the time. Provorov is the no. 1 on a playoff team, Hanifin is the no. 3 on a non-playoff team. Chabot has a higher offensive ceiling than Hanifin. I stand by my comment.


I'd agree with this.

1. Provorov
2. Werenski

Chabot looks like he could be 3 on this list but would need to see a full season of him to properly assess with the rest of this class.

I'd give Hanifin the slight nod over Slavin in terms of value. Both look to be terrific d-men but I'd take the guy who's putting up similar numbers and is 2 years younger.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:09 p.m.
#11
GM Game v1 v2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 266
I think Hanifin > Slavin in terms of value for most GM's, but I personally prefer Slavin. If you dig deep into Hanifin's advanced stats, it shows he's a big contributor to Carolina's defensive woes. Slavin is not. Then again, it depends on if the team absolutely needs an offensive powerhouse and can tolerate the defensive lapses while he matures...
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:14 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1,512
Quoting: Jbarre6
Blaphemy*


It's probably not far off. You're talking a 5th overall D-man with a couple years of seasoning in Hanifin for an 8th overall centreman who could form a solid 1-2-3 punch up the middle with Eichel and ROR for years to come.

Teams that can go 3-deep at Centre can get by with an ok Defence. If your D could stay healthy you'd have a solid core and could focus on wings/goalie.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 2:51 p.m.
#13
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Jeeeesh...Looking at that roster makes my head hurt. Sorry Buffalo, you guys are in trouble for a bit...

Hanifin > Slavin.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 3:24 p.m.
#14
BigBeardBurns
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 535
Hanifin comes through better because of his potential.
And because he’s Batman.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 3:37 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 439
Likes: 84
Any smart Canes fan knows Slavin >>> Hanifin.
Mar. 19, 2018 at 4:16 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,572
Likes: 6,716
Hanifin's value is higher simply because he hasn't reached his potential yet and there is growing belief he will in coming years. BUT if we are talking about the superior player right now, its Slavin. Does that really matter though?

Its the reason why we value prospects so much. Because of the odds of them being better than another player at a certain position. Eventually.

Right now? Slavin. Probably in the future soon? Hanifin.

Strictly on trade value, I think most will say Hanifin but Slavin's contract is a really solid asset.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll