Lets Go Blues
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,786
Likes: 4,336
This has gotten out of hand haha. 117 comments, I'll add one more:
It's not the value of the trade that is invalid... it's the premise. If you break the trade down into 2-3 parts, it isn't so crazy, but it's just not in STL's plan to move out all the guys we just drafted for a mix of guys from Montreal. We've been re-tooling for a few years now, no point in tossing it all away - it probably won't make us better than NSH or WPG next year, and makes us significantly weaker for the next decade. Here's why I think it doesn't work:
- Thomas is a much-needed center. STL is like MTL, always trying to find a center - now we found one of the top OHL players at 20th in the draft, that's a big positive for our franchise. While the value probably doesn't match, I wouldn't want to move Thomas for Zadina straight up unless there were a bunch of other changes to our lineup (i.e. Tavares).
- I think Pacioretty would make more sense at the trade deadline for STL . I can't remember any blue-chip prospects getting moved for a UFA at a trade deadline in recent history. Maybe you could say Jonathen Dahlen since his numbers were great at the time of the Burrows trade, but the general consensus even at the time was that it was an awful trade for OTT (think lite version of Forsberg-Erat). So the Blues probably wouldn't have to give up a Kyrou/Thomas/Thompson/Kostin for a rental, maybe a package like Kaspick + Blais + 1st + 2nd would make sense.
- Gallagher isn't really a guy that Montreal should be moving, so I understand why any trade involving him would require a big overpayment. The Blues would be better off finding someone that is actually on the block and moveable (like when we got Schenn from PHI) and paying the reasonable price for that guy rather than forking over a ton of futures for an important guy like Gallagher.
So, I see this trade as close enough on value but not close on strategy.