SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

sabres

Created by: BenderFlexoFry
Team: 2018-19 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 6, 2018
Published: Jun. 11, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$675,000
2$675,000
2$675,000
1$650,000
3$4,000,000
1$650,000
2$675,000
6$4,500,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,500,000
Dahlin, Rasmus
3$925,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
Trades
1.
2.
BUF
  1. 2018 4th round pick (CHI)
3.
BUF
  1. McGinn, Jamie
  2. 2019 2nd round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Girgensons, Zemgus
  2. 2019 4th round pick (BUF)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2019
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$78,000,000$68,242,857$0$850,000$9,757,143
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 8
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
$3,937,500$3,937,500
C, LW
UFA - 1
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 5
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$3,333,333$3,333,333
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
$5,600,000$5,600,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$850,000$850,000
LW
UFA - 2
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
$675,000$675,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 4
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Dahlin, Rasmus
$925,000$925,000
$5,142,857$5,142,857
RD
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$812,500$812,500
RD
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 11, 2018 at 5:15 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
U certainly addressed our need at LW
However, i don’t like any of your choices
Especially Vanek & McGinn
Our GM & scouts have been on local radio numerous times saying how we wanna get “faster”
Those 2 guys are far from it
So i just don’t see those moves happening
Jun. 11, 2018 at 4:01 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 6
Quoting: Jdfitz77
U certainly addressed our need at LW
However, i don’t like any of your choices
Especially Vanek & McGinn
Our GM & scouts have been on local radio numerous times saying how we wanna get “faster”
Those 2 guys are far from it
So i just don’t see those moves happening


Yeah these moves definitely do not make them faster. I saw it as one more tank year and they can trade Vanek, Wilson, McGinn, and Pominville at the deadline for a bunch of picks.
Jun. 11, 2018 at 6:00 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: BenderFlexoFry
Yeah these moves definitely do not make them faster. I saw it as one more tank year and they can trade Vanek, Wilson, McGinn, and Pominville at the deadline for a bunch of picks.


Ahhhhh... ok, that makes much more sense then
Idk about another tank year though?
1) it’s probably time to start winning
2) that lineup probably has us closer to the playoffs than it does a bottom5 pick
3) Vanek didn’t even get a pick at the deadline last year (and the prospect they got is a bottom6 guy at best)...
so idk if he or Pommer or McGinn would even get us anything at the deadline anyways?
Maybe some low round picks- and if that’s the case,
I’d rather “tank” with letting some of the kids play & hopefully develop
Jun. 11, 2018 at 6:41 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 6
Quoting: Jdfitz77
Ahhhhh... ok, that makes much more sense then
Idk about another tank year though?
1) it’s probably time to start winning
2) that lineup probably has us closer to the playoffs than it does a bottom5 pick
3) Vanek didn’t even get a pick at the deadline last year (and the prospect they got is a bottom6 guy at best)...
so idk if he or Pommer or McGinn would even get us anything at the deadline anyways?
Maybe some low round picks- and if that’s the case,
I’d rather “tank” with letting some of the kids play & hopefully develop


Good point, I forgot how little Vancouver got for Vanek. I don't think Buffalo is ready to compete for a playoff spot, but you're probably right about getting some younger players in the lineup.
Jdfitz77 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2018 at 12:32 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: BenderFlexoFry
Good point, I forgot how little Vancouver got for Vanek. I don't think Buffalo is ready to compete for a playoff spot, but you're probably right about getting some younger players in the lineup.


I do think we are ready to start climbing the standings though
Don’t think we finish bottom10 again next year
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll