Quoting: johnnyu22
Also agree that 2C is the biggest question on forward, and depending on whether or not Chevy wants to fill that hole, the offense changes slightly. If Stastny comes back, I would expect Little or Perreault to be moved (probably Perreault) in order to clear up a little bit of cap. I like Roslovic as a 2C, but would prefer to see him playing another year of 3rd line, perhaps in the middle to see if being a center is a better fit for him than on the wing, but I also don't doubt that he would blossom with Ehlers and Laine. My only problem is that both Ehlers and Laine are slightly irresponsible/high-risk with the puck, which is perfectly ok given their offensive upside, but it is largely beneficial to them to have a veteran center in the middle. Take a look at Laine's production last year following the acquisition of Stastny, he went on a wild goal scoring run and shot up to second/tied-for-first in goals in a matter of less than 20 games. So, signing Stastny may be expensive, but if it creates more space/looks/accountability for Laine and Ehlers and improved their production, it may be a worthwhile expense.
I love Statsny but my only problem is the contract he would sign. If he can take a paycut to play with Laine that's excellent, and worth trading Perrault or Little for. (Agreed it would likely be Perrault.) If it's anything starting to approach 6mill and Roslovic is not your answer, then we should really start looking for other good 2C options. Eric Staal comes to mind immediately. 3.5mill rental who can play 2C and put up in the range of 70 points. He is not the playmaker Stats is, but he's a lot cheaper and a better scorer.
As for Laine, I would really like to see our top line be Ehlers-Scheifs-Laine. Ehlers and Connor are basically 1A/1B depending on whether you're looking for possession stats or pure scoring. Laine isn't as good as Wheeler yet, but he is unquestionably the future 1RW for years and years here. It does break up the chemistry Scheifs and Wheels have, but Scheifs can make anyone produce points and Wheels can do the same at a slightly lesser level. Laine should be playing with the best playmaker and most complete center on the team plain and simple. I think that would balance our top 6 better and give us more of a complete '2 first lines' combination as opposed to a very good 1st line and very good 2nd line.
Note: While I would agree that Laine can be irresponsible in his own zone, and Ehlers can turn the puck over. Ehlers rarely turns the puck over in the neutral zone or defensive zone. Ehlers leads the Jets in defensive zone exits and offensive zone entries. Having him on the ice actually increases the distance between a turnover and our net. When Ehlers and Laine do turn the puck over it just looks worse because it's almost always one of them getting too cute, but they're also 22 and 19 so it's pretty forgivable.
Quoting: johnnyu22
As far as D go, I slightly disagree about Myers having passed his highest trade value - I still think he could get close to as much as he is worth for a one year contract, but since the Jets won't be able to afford him next year, it would be wise to look at offers from other teams, especially considering Buff and Trouba will be first and second pairing and the Jets would definitely prefer a LHD playing along the left side. Whether he moves or not, Kulikov has got to go, simply based on cap hit per pairing, in which he will in fact be overpaid as a probably 3rd pairing D, as you have stated.
Yeah, I just meant that it's really unlikely Myers is traded. That has nothing to do with value, quite the opposite. If I was betting money I would say that Chevy may have pitched Myers for one of the Islanders 1st round picks, or a team in the 10-15 range, and turned down teams like Toronto who held the 25th Overall pick. Myers is absolutely worth a late lottery pick 10-15, but the problem with trading him now is that if you want a fair return, and something the jets can use, you're trading for 2019 picks which have unknown or ballpark value. If I'm the Islanders, there is no way I'm trading next year's first in case the Islanders suck. Pick can always be lottery protected, but that really doesn't help the situation. Case in point, Ottawa and Colorado this year going to next year.
You could always trade Myers for a player, but he is worth way more than a 3rd liner, even a good one, and less than a 2C.
Quoting: johnnyu22
Prospect wise, reports indicate Vesalainen will be playing in North America this season (Moose or Jets) so it would be nice to see him make a push for a job with the Jets, but I can see him being a year away. Appleton is definitely deserving of a look considering his offensive production as a rookie. Poolman will probably play a full season if Myers moves. Sami Niku will probably play a full season if Chariot/Kulikov move. Any of these players who can come in and have an impact will benefit the team now in terms of production and cap, and will also benefit them in years to come because development will be occurring at a fast rate on a good team. Trade Petan/Lemieux/Dano and whichever of the D prospects dont crack the top few desirable.
I don't know if you went to watch development camp this week, but some takeaways:
-Appleton is the best forward there. Hands down. He's very smooth, very fast, is pretty sneaky with getting open, and has a very, very good shot.
-Vesalainen reminds me of Evander Kane. Not as a person, just in that he is big, fast, has a nasty shot, and likes to lean into defenders to make space, use them as a screen to get his shot off. That being said, our bigger guys (Stanley and Samberg) did push him around. I hope he plays for the moose this season, and the jets call him up for our two games in Finland.
-Stanley was hands down the best player out there. One year of AHL and he'll be ready for the show.
-Samberg looks like a monster. His decision-making is a little slow, but his positioning on defense is good. I'm excited to see how he does for his sophomore season.
Bonus: Gustafsson was the surprise of the week. He reminds me of Lowry.
Also a good sign that the Jets didn't even bother telling both Niku and Poolman to report to prospect camp.
Quoting: johnnyu22
Goalie situation is pretty easy - lock up Hellebuyck, dump Mason and try and find a decent backup for a good price (Lehner?) - or, if Mason has to stay, we could probably afford him this season, and he will probably be better than last year, just worry a bit about a goalie who has 2 concussions and a knee injury in the same season, so it would be best to part ways.
Third line is still a question, so I'll be interested to see what happens there...
I am aggressively apathetic to this. Mason's a good backup who's on contract for one more year. If we keep him, I'm happy, if we don't I'm also happy. We're not going to be getting anything in return if we do trade Mason, so the actual worth of trading him plays into my apathy.
So based on what you're saying, and my ideas and meeting in the middle I wouldn't mind seeing this:
Ehlers-Scheifele-Laine
Connor-E. Staal-Wheeler
Pacioretty-Little-Roslovic
Copp-Lowry-Armia
Tanev-Appleton
Morrissey-Trouba
Myers-Byfuglien
Niku-Poolman
Morrow-Chiarot
Perrault/Petan/2019 2nd for Pacioretty 50% retained
Samberg/Dano/Kulikov/2019 1st for Eric Staal 50% retained
We give up our 1st and 2nd next year, but seriously, who could stick with that lineup?