If this is supposed to be some sort of rebuild, the Tampa trade makes no sense. We'd be giving up 3 of the 4 youngest players in the trade including Greenway who is the youngest. Yes, getting Point would be nice, but Killorn and Girardi are older than what we would be giving up, don't fill any sort of need, and don't give us significant cap relief (which we don't need anyway).

getting point is more than nice and girardi is a 1 yr cap dump thats nothing major killorn is a legit top 9 forward, greenway is very raw and hes their "worst best" prospect if u know what that means we have kaprizov soon anyway

If he's a legit top 9 forward, why did you put him on the 4th line behind Foligno? Either way, I don't think it's smart to be paying $4.45 million for the next 5 years to a soon to be 29 year old who has never scored 20 goals and only surpassed 41 points once in his career. It's even worse when he'd max out as a 3rd or 4th liner on this team. I see him as more of a detriment than an asset. For as much crap as Coyle gets, he's a right shot and has broken 20 goals and 50 points before. I'd much rather have him than Killorn on this team.

i made the trade reverted it made it again and forgot to fix the lines imma fix that rn, killorn can hit 20 G 50 P on this team easily

According to Corsica, over the last 2 seasons, his most common linemates at 5 on 5 look like Point, Drouin, Johnson, Namestnikov, and Kucherov. If he couldn't break those thresholds with those players what makes you think he could when paired with Eriksson Ek, and Kunin (as you currently have the lineup). I wouldn't put money on a 29 year old showing significant growth with younger/less offensively gifted linemates, less PP time, and likely less total ice time than he's had in his career. I especially wouldn't bet on him being worth that contract once he hits 33 or 34.

we can trade him again in 2-3-4 years