SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Mode On

Created by: csick
Team: 2018-19 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 15, 2018
Published: Aug. 15, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
Trades
CGY
  1. Stone, Mark
Additional Details:
Retain 3.35 mill
OTT
  1. Frolík, Michael
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. 2020 1st round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$80,000,000$73,490,043$0$1,032,500$6,509,957
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 4
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 6
$7,350,000$7,350,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,950,000$1,950,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 6
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:11 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 1,488
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:20 p.m.
#2
Log off the internet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,830
Likes: 3,866
Lol wtf
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:25 p.m.
#3
VeeMerk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 65
Quoting: athrin
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk


WOAH relax there sir. I think it's safe to say that Stone will not resign in Ottawa next year. And where on earth do you think that Stone gets you Tkachuk? That's not saying Stone isn't a great player, cause he is... that just means that anybody would rather have Tkachuk over Stone. There's a pretty significant age difference, Tkchuck has better raw talent and the contract situation.

So in return you're getting a 1st, a solid former 1st round defender prospect and a cap dump that's UFA in 2 years. The 1st should be a 2019 but other than that, I can't see any teams beat that offer...
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:47 p.m.
#4
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 207
Likes: 41
Quoting: VeeMerk
WOAH relax there sir. I think it's safe to say that Stone will not resign in Ottawa next year. And where on earth do you think that Stone gets you Tkachuk? That's not saying Stone isn't a great player, cause he is... that just means that anybody would rather have Tkachuk over Stone. There's a pretty significant age difference, Tkchuck has better raw talent and the contract situation.

So in return you're getting a 1st, a solid former 1st round defender prospect and a cap dump that's UFA in 2 years. The 1st should be a 2019 but other than that, I can't see any teams beat that offer...


It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.
Aug. 15, 2018 at 4:23 p.m.
#5
VeeMerk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 65
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.


If I can't say Stone won't resign in Ottawa then you can't say 10 teams would be willing to trade a high end prospect, a 1st and other pieces.. I'm not trying to say Stone isn't a top 10 RW in the league, he's been amazing the last 3 years.. Maybe I was devaluation Stone by agreeing with that trade, that's my mistake but I would still take Matt Tkachuck over Stone for a one-on-one
Aug. 15, 2018 at 4:51 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 604
Likes: 119
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.


Tkachuk is not on the table for a trade. he is one of calgarys untouchables unless there is a massive overpay. and from the above comment Valimaki is a high end prospect. Valimaki and a first is a pretty solid offer for a rental. maybe we throw in Kilmchuk or Kylington but I don't see many more teams offering more than that. Frolik is also in there because Calgary would need to clear cap to take on Stones contract
Aug. 15, 2018 at 4:52 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 604
Likes: 119
Ottawa is a dumpster fire that is only intensifying it makes sense for them to be selling off their UFA's unless there is absolute certainty they are going to sign there
Aug. 15, 2018 at 5:19 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 348
Likes: 73
More than fair
Aug. 15, 2018 at 5:44 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 49
Likes: 10
I would not by any stretch say that Tkachuk is better than Stone (coming from a flames fan).

If this were a deadline deal and Calgary had contract in place to resign Stone, then I think it's a fair deal. Valimaki is a high-end D prospect. If Stone wanted to stay in Ottawa he would have signed more than a 1 year deal as he had the leverage in his contract negotiations, even if Melnyk was cheaping out on AAV for a longer term deal. Seems like a low value to get for Stone but it's a better deal than having Stone leave for nothing, in free agency. Stone is a very very good RW.
Aug. 15, 2018 at 10:53 p.m.
#10
WorthyIdiot
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 84
Likes: 9
Quoting: athrin
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk

There is no way in hell Mark Stone is worth Matthew Tkachuk. It’s surprisig how one of the best D prospects in the game doesn’t interest you though. This trade needs more, but Tkachuk for Stone 1 for 1, the flames would be fleeced.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll