SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Habs shouldn't trade Price/Weber : Here's why

Created by: HockeyWise
Team: 2018-19 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 10, 2018
Published: Sep. 10, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Habs need to keep those two guys. Yes they could get picks and prospects and rebuild from scratch but that's not necessarily gonna work. My example is the Edmonton Oilers. They had almost no veteran players to help out all their top 5 picks from 2010 to 2015, struggled and struggled, and we can still argue that it's still the case today. Young players playing around great Veterans like Weber, Price, Gallagher, Petry will help their development. They need mentors. It will also make the team half decent so they don't get destroyed every single game. It will provide them more confidence and will to play the game. Otherwise the team will look like the Sabres and Oilers, and spend 5 years (being generous) and still not make the playoffs.
Trades
MTL
ANA
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. Benn, Jordie
  3. Lehkonen, Artturi
  4. Reilly, Mike
  5. Schlemko, David
  6. Tatar, Tomas
Additional Details:
Here's what the Trade Block should be (not implying we should trade all of them)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$79,500,000$58,248,809$0$2,032,500$21,251,191
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 3
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
C
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$175,000$175K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 8
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 8
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
UFA - 2
$748,333$748,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 10, 2018 at 7:44 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,569
Likes: 6,713
I'm all for trading Lehkonen if the return is nice but he should not be "shopped" as if he's any of the other guys on that list. Lehkonen is a good, young, cost controlled player. You don't put guys like him on the trade block.
Subbanator7667 liked this.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
xd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 236
Likes: 209
Quoting: F50marco
I'm all for trading Lehkonen if the return is nice but he should not be "shopped" as if he's any of the other guys on that list. Lehkonen is a good, young, cost controlled player. You don't put guys like him on the trade block.


I think we have a surplus at LW and should trade Lehkonen while other teams still see upside in him to get the most value. But yeah shouldn't be on a trade block you're right.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 7:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 248
Likes: 29
If we have a surplus at LW the last guy traded should be Lehkonen... this guys going to be a big player on the team going forward. Also I think they should keep Tatar. Good cap hit and has potential for a 25-25 season
Sep. 10, 2018 at 8:14 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 243
Good presentation of Price and Weber role. I think the same way.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 8:20 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,569
Likes: 6,713
Quoting: HockeyWise
I think we have a surplus at LW and should trade Lehkonen while other teams still see upside in him to get the most value. But yeah shouldn't be on a trade block you're right.


Yup agreed on the surplus at that position for sure. Gonna need to figure that out eventually. The nice thing about wingers is they can play both sides pretty easily though. So I'm not too worried.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 8:21 p.m.
#6
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 3,312
I agree with this completely. With the cap going up every year and the number of entry-level contracts we will have for the next 3-6 years Prices and Webers contracts won't matter and by the time we're ready for contention the only other player we will absolutely have to resign is Gallagher. I also agree with the guys above, I love Lehkonen, I think he will be a great piece for years to come and his trade value will probably be higher once he has a few 30+ point seasons under him and is signed to a nice contract, which is bound to happen after his ELC
Sep. 10, 2018 at 8:26 p.m.
#7
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 928
I don't think Montreal really has a choice with Weber. With the injuries, his age, and that massive contract that takes him until he's 41, I don't think any team is looking to add him anymore...
CD282 liked this.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 8:38 p.m.
#8
Habs fan somehow
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 312
Likes: 80
Agree, plus teams don't have to tank to reach cup contender status (look at WPG and NSH). Drafting stud players on a consistent basis is the key. Somebody was asking on another post: "How come this team seemed to have all the pieces 5-6 years ago and achieved nothing?" Pour drafting since 2007 certainly didn't help.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 9:13 p.m.
#9
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 2,064
First of all I think Price and Weber will be difficult to move. But you are right they should keep them. Price alone will provide them steady goaltending throughout the next 8 years, he will not always be an elite goalie but he will be a steady starter that will win you more than he loses. Same with Weber, throughout the duration of his deal he won’t remain at the level he has been, but I think he will still be an effective defender, I could see him being good into his 40s like Chara. Also with the way the league is now you never know, the Habs could get in this year for all we know
Sep. 10, 2018 at 9:37 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,955
Likes: 7,724
Quoting: alexgoodyear
If we have a surplus at LW the last guy traded should be Lehkonen... this guys going to be a big player on the team going forward. Also I think they should keep Tatar. Good cap hit and has potential for a 25-25 season


I find it interesting that Tatar has a "good cap hit" and Lucic has a "bad cap hit", when both players got just 34 points last year and Lucic had more points the previous 2 years.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 9:38 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,955
Likes: 7,724
Quoting: mk458
I don't think Montreal really has a choice with Weber. With the injuries, his age, and that massive contract that takes him until he's 41, I don't think any team is looking to add him anymore...


And Price for the same reasons.
mk458 liked this.
Sep. 10, 2018 at 11:24 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 945
Likes: 247
idk if price or weber are movable to begin with, I could see some interest in price(but his contract means he might say no to that place) but not a ton in weber, the habs would absolutely have to kick in retention to have any shot. So by that point why not just keep him I guess.
Sep. 11, 2018 at 7:22 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 248
Likes: 29
Quoting: CD282
I find it interesting that Tatar has a "good cap hit" and Lucic has a "bad cap hit", when both players got just 34 points last year and Lucic had more points the previous 2 years.


Lucic is 3 years older, has 700,000 more against the cap and is under contract 3 years longer than Tatar. Also Tatar has managed to score 20 goals 5 straight seasons including the last 2 where he played the majority of his games with the stinky red wings
Sep. 11, 2018 at 7:56 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,955
Likes: 7,724
Quoting: alexgoodyear
Lucic is 3 years older, has 700,000 more against the cap and is under contract 3 years longer than Tatar. Also Tatar has managed to score 20 goals 5 straight seasons including the last 2 where he played the majority of his games with the stinky red wings


They're TWO years apart, Lucic's contract is TWO years longer than Tatar's, and Lucic gets more points than Tatar and has every year except one. Also, Lucic brings other elements to the game if he isn't scoring, Tatar does not. Notice he was inconsequential in Vegas' cup run? Got benched for the majority of the games.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll