SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No need for Stamkos, we have 4 centres

Created by: JimCarrey
Team: 2016-17 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 1, 2016
Published: May 1, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Why pay Stamkos over 10 mil to score 30 goals when we can pay Parenteau under 3 to score 20??

We need to address the long term goalie situation and I have found some recent info...since Fleury has a NMC they have to protect him in the expansion draft and unless they trade him (unlikely) they'll be trading Murray.
-Let me know what you think of my proposed trade (probably not enough for him)

This team has 4 SOLID lines, which seems to be the need in the NHL these days

btw Marner is STRICTLY the 13th forward because I'm not sure he'll be in the NHL next year (although i think he will)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$900,000
2$1,000,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Zaitsev, Nikita
2$925,000
Matthews, Auston
3$925,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
PIT
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Leivo, Josh
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick (Pitts)
2017 2nd round pick (SJs)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$74,000,000$66,485,333$512,000$2,322,500$7,514,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
UFA - 6
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Matthews, Auston
$925,000$925,000
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$4,200,000$4,200,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$686,667$686,667 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 3
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
$628,333$628,333 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
G
UFA - 1
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 3
Zaitsev, Nikita
$925,000$925,000
$4,150,000$4,150,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 1, 2016 at 9:04 p.m.
#1
Habsessed
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 145
Likes: 12
Well done. I think you are 100% right. The Leafs have always taken shortcuts in the past, they are now building the right way and should stick to the plan.
May 1, 2016 at 9:53 p.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,939
Likes: 22,913
Agree with most of what you did. Wonder if Leivo is going to get a shot at wing instead of Parenteau. Stamkos: You're right, the Leafs don't need him now. Let's develop the young guys, maybe they become stars and get big money in a few years. There will always be UFAs available, why force it this year? Marner, yea I think he on the team, though maybe he might be limited to 40 Leaf games and the World Juniors. Probably best for his development than sending back to junior. Murray and the goaltending. Think the Leafs want to give Sparks and Bibeau some time in the NHL and lots minutes in the AHL. Better evaluation. Summer of 2017 there will be goalies available and maybe quite a few in there is expansion. Just wouldn't make a move this season and give up assets.
May 2, 2016 at 8:32 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
You guys completely miss the real reason why the leafs needs Stamkos if he becomes available. For one he would automatically become the best player on the team. Most likely he will be captain. All the pressure will be on him to carry the team not any of the younger guys. Want to know why Edmonton has been terrible for so long with all those great picks? Its because there has been too much pressure put on them too early to succeed. They didnt have that transition time to grow into true NHLers. Second, if you look at the team we dont have any true goal scorers except for maybe JVR. Marner and Brown are still rookies, too early to tell how well they can finish in the NHL. Once again do you want to put that pressure on them if they dont make an impact right away? Lastly you sign Stamkos for 7 years he will be 33/34. Pretty much the point where most elite players start to drop off.
May 2, 2016 at 10:50 a.m.
#4
Habsessed
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 145
Likes: 12
Matt I disagree with you on a number of points.

The reason why Edmonton hasn't succeeded yet isn't because of pressure it's because they have too much of 1 thing and nothing of the other. They have Hall, RNH, Yakupov, Eberle, McDavid and so on but who is focused on keeping the puck out of their own net? That's the problem no D, No shutdown forwards and No goalie.

by signing Stamkos the leafs will have Stamkos, Nylander, Marner, Kadri, JVR, and Yes Rilley but other than him who is plying D? Who's there goalie? You end up with the same problem Edmonton has. Save the cap space let the kids grow together and go get some D and young goalie.

As for pressure I disagree with you again. Pressure stems from expectations. This year the expectation was to suck and get the top pick. So there was zero pressure. Next year the pressure goes up with the addition of Matthews. You add a Stamkos and boom this city is going to start planing the parade. The expectations are going way up and with that so does the pressure. And suddenly the Leafs will start thinking about geting guys to win now. it's a short cut much like Kessel ( I know Stamkos is better)

Build the right way, they are doing it now for the first time. they should stick to it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll