SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Monops

Created by: nmstars31
Team: 2016-17 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2016
Published: May 9, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,700,000
2$1,700,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,500,000
3$2,000,000
3$3,000,000
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$74,000,000$70,990,417$315,000$2,075,000$3,009,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 2
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
NTC
UFA - 5
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
$2,650,000$2,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW
UFA
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$162,500$162K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RD
UFA - 4
$1,550,000$1,550,000
G
UFA - 1
$896,250$896,250
LD
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,600,000$3,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 9, 2016 at 9:17 a.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,898
Likes: 23,458
Just my opinion of Hamhuis....Shouldn't the Canucks be moving on from him? Can his UFA be better spent elsewhere? The Canucks couldn't trade him at the TDL because of his NTC. Gee, it looks like Hamhuis was not looking at the long term good of the Canucks. IMO move on.
Jun. 10, 2016 at 8:28 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 336
Likes: 23
It seems that they are in a win now mode while the Sedins are still on the roster so I figured that they would try to keep Hamhuis, but since they acquired Gudbranson, I agree, Hamhuis will be needing to find new real estate.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll