SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins Now amp Future

Created by: B_Boy
Team: 2018-19 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 19, 2019
Published: Jan. 19, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Gotta do something Donnie!
These trades are needed for now & future cap space for
signings
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$700,000
2$650,000
2$700,000
2$700,000
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob
  3. Lauzon, Jérémy
Additional Details:
Bruins need a physical RW, Andersons the answer though I dont know if Columbus would make trade so got to sweeten the pot....if not trade less for Virtanen on Vancouver
2.
EDM
  1. Krug, Torey
Additional Details:
Bruins arent going to sign Krug so move him when he’s at his highest worth on contract tenure....later. Bruins get a top minutes guy with a nice contract. This also helps Carlo get some more Chara time and Chiarelli gets his offensive d-man
3.
STL
  1. Backes, David
  2. Fitzgerald, Ryan
  3. Heinen, Danton
Additional Details:
....alright. It’s worth a try. If not, definitely need to unload Backes in off season for anything
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYR
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$69,139,335$774,000$3,232,500$10,360,665
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$742,500$742,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$789,167$789,167
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:36 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 5,490
Likes: 1,659
Klefbom worth more than Krug alone
Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:40 p.m.
#2
BeastMode5515
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 416
Why did CF take away ratings? DONT TRADE DEBRUSK!! AND ESPECIALLY NOT DEBRUSK+ FOR THAT RETURN! God.
Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:43 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Edited Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:49 p.m.
These are god awful.

Edmonton is on Krug’s no trade list.

Boston would not include Debrusk for Panarin now they are going to trade him with 2 good prospect for Anderson and a stiff. Right

Maroon sucks. Bad as Backes is he still outproduces Maroon, he’s a 4th liner.

The only thing you got right is they do need to move Backes. Highly unlikely it happens this year though.
BeastMode5515 liked this.
Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:45 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: Poehling
Klefbom worth more than Krug alone[/quote
...If so then no more than a prospect
Jan. 19, 2019 at 11:53 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: BeastMode5515
Why did CF take away ratings? DONT TRADE DEBRUSK!! AND ESPECIALLY NOT DEBRUSK+ FOR THAT RETURN! God.

...lol. I like Debrusk but got to give up something get something good. Josh Anderson scores, hits & will fight. Simmonds may be quick answer but we may not be able to pay him next year with all the new contracts to sign. Whatever Bruins do, we dont need another left winger or left shot anything...how about Jake Virtanen?
Jan. 20, 2019 at 12:04 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
These are god awful.

Edmonton is on Krug’s no trade list.

Boston would not include Debrusk for Panarin now they are going to trade him with 2 good prospect for Anderson and a stiff. Right

Maroon sucks. Bad as Backes is he still outproduces Maroon, he’s a 4th liner.

The only thing you got right is they do need to move Backes. Highly unlikely it happens this year though.

Krug, you got me there on trade. Where would you send him?
Panarin we cant afford him in 2019-2020 so thats stupid...do the math.
Maroon sucks on a suck team so I beg to differ. To move Backes, it “should” be done in off season with a prospect for some St. Louis style ribs
Jan. 20, 2019 at 12:09 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: B_Boy
Krug, you got me there on trade. Where would you send him?
Panarin we cant afford him in 2019-2020 so thats stupid...do the math.
Maroon sucks on a suck team so I beg to differ. To move Backes, it “should” be done in off season with a prospect for some St. Louis style ribs


Columbus and Boston discussed Panarin in the offseason. Bruins ended the discussions when Debrusk had to be included. I never said they should trade for him, learn to read.

Maroon has sucked everywhere unless he was with McDavid. He’s a waste of roster space.
BeastMode5515 liked this.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:12 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 96
Likes: 27
DeBrusk IS the "Bruins now and future"
B_Boy liked this.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:27 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
I agree, Debrusk is great! But the Bruins need a 2nd line RW not just for this season. There are plenty of LWs that can slot into Debrusks spot
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:34 a.m.
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
1 star. I’m being generous. This is awful
B_Boy liked this.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:37 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
Columbus and Boston discussed Panarin in the offseason. Bruins ended the discussions when Debrusk had to be included. I never said they should trade for him, learn to read.

...Never said anything about who you would trade. Do you propose any?
I stated, “Panarin we cant afford him”. As in, the reason the trade never happened was because of money not Debrusk being untouchable. You really think Debrusk is untouchable?? Dont believe everything you read
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:39 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: Bcarlo25
1 star. I’m being generous. This is awful

Hey, something new. I’m tired of the Schenn & Simmonds proposals
Jan. 20, 2019 at 1:56 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Edited Jan. 20, 2019 at 2:01 a.m.
Quoting: B_Boy


Nobody is untouchable. There is no such thing.

CBS would take Debrusk alone for Anderson/Letestu and laugh about it afterwards. I like how you say Anderson scores. Debrusk had 43 points as rookie. Anderson’s season high is 30. I would not mind Anderson for the 3rd line. His max value is a 2nd round pick and mid-level prospect or mid-round pick. Honestly would not go more than the 2nd.

Anderson, Virtananen, Maroon. I’m sensing a patern. Big, slow, unproductive, poor defensively.

Most posters try to rip the other team off. You are ripping off your own. Unique twist.
B_Boy liked this.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 2:24 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
Nobody is untouchable. There is no such thing.
Anderson, Virtananen, Maroon. I’m sensing a patern. Big, slow, unproductive, poor defensively.

Jake Virtanen is faster than you think. Also I believe Anderson is like Tom Wilson. He's not bad for a big, slow guy in play offs. Either way the Bruins need a physical top 6 player which they dont have.

Most posters try to rip the other team off. You are ripping off your own. Unique twist
....lol.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 2:43 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 3:02 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
B_Boy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.

I’ve seen some of your posts. Humor me...
Jan. 20, 2019 at 6:10 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Quoting: B_Boy
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.

I’ve seen some of your posts. Humor me...


DeBrusk alone for Anderson is no good. DeBrusk has 4 less points in 8 less games and is 2yr younger than Anderson. Don't forget the pain in the ass Anderson was last year about singing and guess what, he's do for a contract after next season. Lauzon is part of the future core 4 of our defense with McAvoy, Carlo and Vaak. JFK I'm higher on than most people, but that's a different discussion.

Krug for Klefbom....well Krug has EDM on his No Trade list, so there's that. I wouldn't mind moving Krug, but it's for forward help. We have LHD that are waiting in the system and are NHL ready.

Finally the Maroon trade. Maroon was nearly put on waivers two weeks ago. Hes playing 10-11 minutes a night and has been awful. Boston isn't going to re-sign him, so your basically giving up a kid whose shown he can put up 47 point in the NHL + mid prospect just to get rid of Backes this season. If you wait till after Backes bonus gets paid out this summer then he becomes more attractive for a trade as he'll only be owed $5 million over the next 2 years.

On top of all this, your trades didn't make the team better and actually you made it worse. The team is currently 2 points out of being 2nd in the eastern conference.
Gofnut999 and B_Boy liked this.
Jan. 20, 2019 at 10:57 a.m.
#18
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Columbus trade is so freaking bad. Since CF took away the rating system, I'll create my own.

RATING = -5 STARS

REASONING: All trades are horrendous. The Columbus is absolutely horrendous. You're trading Jake DeBrusk + JFK + Lauzon for Josh Anderson. Like what? How did this cross your mind as a "good move". Letestu is an AHL scrub at this point. He holds no value. You still somehow grossly overpaid for both players in one trade.

Jake DeBrusk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Anderson
JFK + Lauzon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Letestu

Bruins Package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Jackets Package/return
Breakaway liked this.
Jan. 21, 2019 at 7:18 a.m.
#19
Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 509
Likes: 80
Quoting: BreKel
Columbus trade is so freaking bad. Since CF took away the rating system, I'll create my own.

RATING = -5 STARS

REASONING: All trades are horrendous. The Columbus is absolutely horrendous. You're trading Jake DeBrusk + JFK + Lauzon for Josh Anderson. Like what? How did this cross your mind as a "good move". Letestu is an AHL scrub at this point. He holds no value. You still somehow grossly overpaid for both players in one trade.

Jake DeBrusk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Anderson
JFK + Lauzon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Letestu

Bruins Package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Jackets Package/return


I was going to do my own personal "Starsearch" rating of one quarter star, but I think your rating is more accurate. These are just plain terrible all around except for the Klefbom trade which wouldn't happen because it makes Edmonton worse. None of these are even close to fair.
BreKel liked this.
Jan. 21, 2019 at 2:21 p.m.
#20
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: B_Boy
Hey, something new. I’m tired of the Schenn & Simmonds proposals


Ya, it’s new because it’s really, really, really, dumb
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll