SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

lucic

Created by: mats_naslund_fan
Team: 2018-19 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 25, 2019
Published: Jan. 25, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Nicholson said they will not give up the future but I think giving up the #1 to a team to take lucic will work. We do not want Lucic as part of the future either and you have to give something big to get rid of that contract.
Trades
CAR
  1. Benson, Tyler
  2. Lucic, Milan ($1,500,000 retained)
  3. 2019 1st round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$75,371,165$0$0$4,128,835
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$650,000$650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$675,000$675,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$675,000$675,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,150,000$1,150,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:41 p.m.
#1
Badgm91
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 638
Likes: 162
No one is taking lucic unless you retain 50%
sedin33 liked this.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:44 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Badgm91
No one is taking lucic unless you retain 50%


You could have stopped at nonone is taking Lucic.
skriko liked this.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:45 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 605
Likes: 122
No, dont trade the pick for a rental. Thats dumb as ****.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:51 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 892
Likes: 301
Quoting: sedin33
You could have stopped at nonone is taking Lucic.


I wonder, as a Canucks fan, would you take Lucic 2-3 million retained, Bear, and a low pick for Gudbranson?
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:55 p.m.
#5
Beanmachine
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 497
HAHAHA so I read your description and expected to see Lucic + 1st for some minor prospect or something - but instead you want Ferland and Faulk a 26 yr old top 4 RHD. That alone would probably cost you a 1st and Benson - AND you want them to take on Lucic for 4.5M for the next forever??

You guys are going to have to get a lot more creative than that to get rid of that anchor.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 12:58 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
ferland is gone in a couple months and Faulk is gone after next year. You get a first round pick, a prospect, and yes Lucic (with retained salary).
GMTD liked this.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 1:37 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
I wonder, as a Canucks fan, would you take Lucic 2-3 million retained, Bear, and a low pick for Gudbranson?


Lucic is a non-starter. He also has a NMC and would need to be protected in the expansion draft.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 1:45 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 892
Likes: 301
Quoting: sedin33
Lucic is a non-starter. He also has a NMC and would need to be protected in the expansion draft.


In which case you make him waive or buy him out.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 1:58 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
In which case you make him waive or buy him out.


He has 4 more years at $6M and a NMC. Don't think you can waive him. Buyout would cost $12M over 8 years. I thought I heard he had some buyout protection. Once again why do this deal?
Jan. 25, 2019 at 2:11 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 892
Likes: 301
Quoting: sedin33
He has 4 more years at $6M and a NMC. Don't think you can waive him. Buyout would cost $12M over 8 years. I thought I heard he had some buyout protection. Once again why do this deal?


To get Bear and a pick. If in 2021 you buy him out, it’ll be 10,833,333 over four years.
Year 1: 4,083,333
Year 2: 5,583,333
Year 3: 583,333
Year4: 583,333
He is a roster player, even though he’s been pretty bad. He’s a solid fourth line guy IMO. He doesn’t fit our mould, that’s for sure, but to get Bean and maybe a second, I think we might do it if it got rid of Gudbranson, and maybe brought in Russell. Lucic, a second, Bear, and Russell for Gagner, Schaller, and Gudbranson looks good to me.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 3:03 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
To get Bear and a pick. If in 2021 you buy him out, it’ll be 10,833,333 over four years.
Year 1: 4,083,333
Year 2: 5,583,333
Year 3: 583,333
Year4: 583,333
He is a roster player, even though he’s been pretty bad. He’s a solid fourth line guy IMO. He doesn’t fit our mould, that’s for sure, but to get Bean and maybe a second, I think we might do it if it got rid of Gudbranson, and maybe brought in Russell. Lucic, a second, Bear, and Russell for Gagner, Schaller, and Gudbranson looks good to me.


I'm not sure we'll agree on this one.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 3:15 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 892
Likes: 301
Quoting: sedin33
I'm not sure we'll agree on this one.


I don’t either. Though I do see your point of view. Equal value makes no sense Vancouver. A no show for a no show. It’s just pointless. I’d honestly rather just keep our bad contract level at minimum and proceed with our rebuild. Though trading guys like Sutter and Tanev should be traded for prospects/picks. I just wouldn’t mind taking on bad deals to get A prospects. Taking on shorter term dumps might be better though.
sedin33 liked this.
Jan. 25, 2019 at 3:35 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
I agree with you. Happy to "weaponize the cap". I just think the cost for the Lucic deal for the Oilers to get rid of that contract would be prohibitive. I would stay away from a few contracts like Seabrook, Lucic... I don't mind taking on deals that have < 3 years left.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll