SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blackhawks TDL - Everything Must Go

Created by: DarthKane
Team: 2018-19 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 30, 2019
Published: Jan. 30, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2020 7th round pick (SJS)
TOR
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
  2. Krüger, Marcus ($1,387,500 retained)
2.
CHI
  1. 2019 7th round pick (VGK)
PIT
  1. Dahlström, Carl
  2. Kunitz, Chris ($500,000 retained)
3.
CHI
  1. 2021 6th round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Forsling, Gustav
  2. Ward, Cam ($1,500,000 retained)
4.
CHI
  1. 2019 3rd round pick (WPG)
VGK
  1. Kahun, Dominik
  2. Saad, Brandon
  3. 2020 7th round pick (CHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the VGK
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$58,052,211$1,232,500$4,347,500$21,447,789
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$833,750$833,750
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$865,000$865,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$730,000$730,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:29 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Please delete....this is how trolling starts
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:36 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
DarthKane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 829
Likes: 130
Quoting: ChiHawk
Please delete....this is how trolling starts


Not trolling... being sarcastic. There are some silly trade suggestions out there right now.
grant11 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:38 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: DarthKane
Not trolling... being sarcastic. There are some silly trade suggestions out there right now.


This is pretty bad and gives idiots dumb ideas clogging up the website worse then it already is with bad trades. Since they took away the stars, trying to weed through all the bad AGM's to find a decent one is annoying at best.
grant11 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:45 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
DarthKane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 829
Likes: 130
Quoting: ChiHawk
This is pretty bad and gives idiots dumb ideas clogging up the website worse then it already is with bad trades. Since they took away the stars, trying to weed through all the bad AGM's to find a decent one is annoying at best.


Even when people try to make decent suggestions they get jumped all over.

This TDL will be quiet. Kruger will go, maybe Kunitz and/or Ward if they agree. Mid to late round picks is all I expect back, Maybe a “C” level prospect too if salary is retained. Any move for a non-pending UFA will happen in the off-season.
grant11 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:49 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: DarthKane
Even when people try to make decent suggestions they get jumped all over.

This TDL will be quiet. Kruger will go, maybe Kunitz and/or Ward if they agree. Mid to late round picks is all I expect back, Maybe a “C” level prospect too if salary is retained. Any move for a non-pending UFA will happen in the off-season.


Kruger and Hayden will go. AA will go in the summer more then likely. Maybe one of Dahlstrom, Davidson, Kroekk or Forsling.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:52 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
DarthKane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 829
Likes: 130
Quoting: ChiHawk
Kruger and Hayden will go. AA will go in the summer more then likely. Maybe one of Dahlstrom, Davidson, Kroekk or Forsling.


Maybe Hayden goes now, it wouldn’t surprise me. Anisimov will be moved for sure after his NTC expires and his signing bonus is paid, possible destinations - Ottawa, Islanders, New Jersey. I hope they hold onto Dahlström, the others can go.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 1:55 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: DarthKane
Maybe Hayden goes now, it wouldn’t surprise me. Anisimov will be moved for sure after his NTC expires and his signing bonus is paid, possible destinations - Ottawa, Islanders, New Jersey. I hope they hold onto Dahlström, the others can go.


Well AA did submit his 10 teams but highly unlikely those 10 just happen to be looking for AA. Buf and Car are another spot for him.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 2:00 a.m.
#8
Mr
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Cam Ward has a Full NMC and unless Crow comes back which isn't likely it wouldn't make much sense to move him as we would have to bring up Forsberg and I know all hawks fans would love that lol. Plus his numbers haven't been good 0.888 SV% And a 3.87GAA plus Calgary is good for a starter with Rittich having a great year. Smith isn't any better then Ward with a 3.04GAA And a 0.888SV%. Plus having Forsling in that deal would just be giving him up for nothing not saying he's been amazing this season but he's been hurt to be fair.

Chris Kunitz also has a NMC but he's played very little this season so I'm sure he would be willing to wave it for Pittsburgh if Chicago retained half of his salary like you have above. Dahlström I don't think Stan would give up on for nothing but a throw in he's more valuable for his potential. Only other thing is teams can only retain 2 salaries of players not 3 like you have above with Kruger.

I would agree getting rid of Krüger would likely help our cap situation at $2,775,000 but it isn't likely anyone would bite on taking him even with retaining salary unless they were looking for a bottom 6 centre because of his FO% which is 46.59% but at that rate you could just get Jason Spezza off the Dallas Stars his FO% is 59.5% second best in the league as a rental and he's a UFA after this year.
Erik Gustafsson has been great for us this year likely the best D on our blue line this year yes he's not perfect but for $1,200,000 signed for next year he's great and if you were going to go ahead and deal him you might get some high picks but I wouldn't he's only 26 and he finally looks like he's coming into his own.

And lastly the Saad trade I don't even know what to say to that, Saad is making $6,000,000 yes we know he's overpaid. Yes Stan should've kept the Breadman but he's not unless and not worth getting rid of for just a 3rd along with Kahun he's looking great this year we need to keep good young players like that to see what their full potential is.


The Only players that Stan should try and move are Kunitz, Seabrook and Murphy what return these players could get is likely very low and you'd likely need Peter Chiarelli to trade with to take Seabrook but Stan has been on a role with winning trades lately so we will see what happens.


EDIT just saw you were being sarcastic glad you weren't being serious lol
Jan. 30, 2019 at 9:46 a.m.
#9
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 2,843
Quoting: DarthKane
Even when people try to make decent suggestions they get jumped all over.

This TDL will be quiet. Kruger will go, maybe Kunitz and/or Ward if they agree. Mid to late round picks is all I expect back, Maybe a “C” level prospect too if salary is retained. Any move for a non-pending UFA will happen in the off-season.


I don't think this deadline will be as quiet as you think. A D man is on his way out sometime soon as the hawks will be over the roster limit. An article was released by 670 the score's Jay Zawaski saying a reliable source within the hawks brass believes someone on the back end is getting moved. Money is on Gustafsson.
Jan. 30, 2019 at 10:59 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
DarthKane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 829
Likes: 130
Quoting: NickC1988
I don't think this deadline will be as quiet as you think. A D man is on his way out sometime soon as the hawks will be over the roster limit. An article was released by 670 the score's Jay Zawaski saying a reliable source within the hawks brass believes someone on the back end is getting moved. Money is on Gustafsson.


I’d trade Gus too. I have nothing against Gus, he offers great value. But he’ll likely bring the best return and I don’t see him coming back after his contract is up. Sell now, his value won’t get any higher.
Jan. 31, 2019 at 10:13 p.m.
#11
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 2,843
Quoting: DarthKane
I’d trade Gus too. I have nothing against Gus, he offers great value. But he’ll likely bring the best return and I don’t see him coming back after his contract is up. Sell now, his value won’t get any higher.


Agreed his extra contract year is huge at that price.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll