SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zibanejad to WPG Read Description

Created by: AdamFox
Team: 2018-19 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 5, 2019
Published: Feb. 5, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Zib at 5.3 x 4 is a steal but his NMC kicks in this summer so NYR ultimately flip him when his value is high. The rangers aren't competing for a while A PPG 26Y/O Center with term rather then trading him when he is a 30Y/O in a contract year looking for a raise.
Trades
NYR
  1. Stanley, Logan
  2. Vesalainen, Kristian
  3. 2019 1st round pick (WPG)
  4. 2019 2nd round pick (WPG)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2020
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2021
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$79,500,000$71,221,526$0$1,732,500$8,278,474
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,275,000$2,275,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,175,000$5,175,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$708,750$708,750
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,700,000$5,700,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,350,000$4,350,000
LD/RD, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$863,333$863,333
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:13 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 706
Likes: 7
Like this trade for both sides
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:14 p.m.
#2
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
As a NYR fan, not sure Zibanejad is available at all, especially the way he's playing now. Only way this could possibly happen is if Hayes extends, which I don't see happening given he'll be a UFA. Return is pretty good but realistically we aren't trading 93.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:16 p.m.
#3
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Done, done and DONE! Pack your winter coat Zibby your on your way to a contender! THIS is the kind of trade the Jets should be looking for, not another rental and not trading Roslovic.
AdamFox liked this.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:16 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
I personally as a NHL fan sense don't like the idea of Winnipeg selling Vesalainen. Dude is an absolute stud of a player.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:17 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: Jambo
As a NYR fan, not sure Zibanejad is available at all, especially the way he's playing now. Only way this could possibly happen is if Hayes extends, which I don't see happening given he'll be a UFA. Return is pretty good but realistically we aren't trading 93.


IM a NYR fan too, who would have ever guessed brassard was available when we traded him ? I think this also has hidden value, help us get to the bottom of the standings tremendously. Keep getting prospects until 2020 when smith, shatty, hank, staal (25mi) comes off the books and then start adding
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:24 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Wow, would that be horrible for the Rangers.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:24 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: aspina25
Wow, would that be horrible for the Rangers.


Wow, Veselanian is only a top 5 prospect in all of hockey
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:29 p.m.
#8
Jetsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 7,983
Likes: 2,589
Switch out the 2nd rounder for a 2020 2nd but give us back a 2020 4th rounder. The Jets wont give up that many pieces in the draft...Overall its fine
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:30 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Quoting: buchnevichh
Wow, Veselanian is only a top 5 prospect in all of hockey


He's a good prospect, but definitely not top 5. Pronman has him at 26 and Button has him at 22.

Regardless, this absolutely kills team morale. What does it show to the players? Play good and we'll send you away, even if you're locked up long term on a super team friendly deal?
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:31 p.m.
#10
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,661
Likes: 2,253
Looks pretty decent, I just hope the Jets can afford it all. Maybe New York has to take back a bad contract (Kulikov?)

EDIT: Actually Perreault would probably be better for both teams, if we're going there
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:34 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
So... if a team is not doing good this season they should just sell off anyone that is good and has term, because...? They are still a hockey team. You sell off guys without term and keep the guys with term.
aspina25 liked this.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:44 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Out of your mind.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 12:54 p.m.
#13
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I personally as a NHL fan sense don't like the idea of Winnipeg selling Vesalainen. Dude is an absolute stud of a player.


I'm a Jets fan and I'd part with Vesalainen for Zibenejad in a heartbeat, h£ll I'd add a few more pieces to get it done.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:03 p.m.
#14
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Quoting: buchnevichh
IM a NYR fan too, who would have ever guessed brassard was available when we traded him ? I think this also has hidden value, help us get to the bottom of the standings tremendously. Keep getting prospects until 2020 when smith, shatty, hank, staal (25mi) comes off the books and then start adding


I think this Ranger fan has the right idea. NY is still years away from competing and years of term locked up in bad contracts like Staal, Smith and Shattenkirk will keep the NY from being competitive and trading them will cost you assets. Better off to trade some pieces of value for a big return and rebuild.
AdamFox liked this.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:34 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Looks pretty decent, I just hope the Jets can afford it all. Maybe New York has to take back a bad contract (Kulikov?)

EDIT: Actually Perreault would probably be better for both teams, if we're going there


wouldn't be a problem for NYR
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:40 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: biglite351
So... if a team is not doing good this season they should just sell off anyone that is good and has term, because...? They are still a hockey team. You sell off guys without term and keep the guys with term.


its not about not doing good, their rebuilding. We need to get high draft picks because we are years away. when the rangers are competitive zibanejad will be 30
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:45 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Quoting: buchnevichh
its not about not doing good, their rebuilding. We need to get high draft picks because we are years away. when the rangers are competitive zibanejad will be 30


Right, Because a player can't be good at 30?

When Phil Kessel was 25 (same age as Mika is currently) he put up 52 points in 48 games, very similar to Mika's current numbers. Last year he was 30 and put up 92 points in 82 games. Players don't just disappear the moment they turn 30.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:47 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: aspina25
Right, Because a player can't be good at 30?

When Phil Kessel was 25 (same age as Mika is currently) he put up 52 points in 48 games, very similar to Mika's current numbers. Last year he was 30 and put up 92 points in 82 games. Players don't just disappear the moment they turn 30.


my point exactly Pittsburgh for example.. have top end talent next to kessel ever heard of Crosby and malkin ? thats from getting the 1st and 2nd overall pick and rebuilding for multiple years. When the rangers do that they can go out and trade for a kessel like Pittsburgh did
Feb. 5, 2019 at 1:52 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Quoting: buchnevichh
my point exactly Pittsburgh for example.. have top end talent next to kessel ever heard of Crosby and malkin ? thats from getting the 1st and 2nd overall pick and rebuilding for multiple years. When the rangers do that they can go out and trade for a kessel like Pittsburgh did


Why would you trade someone away in hopes of trading for someone exactly like them further down the line??

It's a "you can pick between this boat and the mystery box. The box can contain anything, even a boat!" Scenario
Feb. 5, 2019 at 2:20 p.m.
#20
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Doesn't make sense for the rangers... Yes there are the Smith/Staal contracts that are horrible and the shatty one that isn't the best. There is a simple solution.

Rid the UFA's for picks/prospects: For Hayes/Zucc/McQuaid/Claesson we could be looking at 2 good prospects, and a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks
Rid the not so great cap hit with middle six depth to a team that can afford it: Package Vesey/Strome and a late pick for someone to take Smith
Buyout the really horrible contracts: Staal (and smith if you can't do the above)
Trade away a slightly overpriced contract with retained: Shatty @ 1/2 retained should garner a good prospect and a 2nd minimally. Probably could get Foote from Tampa if you take back callahan as well (and buy him out)

You keep the core: Kreider, Zibanejad, Chytil, DeAngelo, Howden, Skjei, Pionk, Fast
Introduce prospects: Kravtsov, Miller, Lundkvist, Shestyorkin, Andersson
Introduce FA: Panarin, Karlsson, Marner (offer sheet) -- need to get 1/3 minimally, 2/3 ideal, 3/3 is impossible for cap reasons
And you have a solid top 9F and top 4D

rangers have solid depth defenseman options between Lindgren, Hajek, Rykov, etc. Maybe package Pionk with one of them and a earlyish pick for a potential top pairing RHD
Feb. 5, 2019 at 2:24 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: Spanky227
Doesn't make sense for the rangers... Yes there are the Smith/Staal contracts that are horrible and the shatty one that isn't the best. There is a simple solution.

Rid the UFA's for picks/prospects: For Hayes/Zucc/McQuaid/Claesson we could be looking at 2 good prospects, and a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks
Rid the not so great cap hit with middle six depth to a team that can afford it: Package Vesey/Strome and a late pick for someone to take Smith
Buyout the really horrible contracts: Staal (and smith if you can't do the above)
Trade away a slightly overpriced contract with retained: Shatty @ 1/2 retained should garner a good prospect and a 2nd minimally. Probably could get Foote from Tampa if you take back callahan as well (and buy him out)

You keep the core: Kreider, Zibanejad, Chytil, DeAngelo, Howden, Skjei, Pionk, Fast
Introduce prospects: Kravtsov, Miller, Lundkvist, Shestyorkin, Andersson
Introduce FA: Panarin, Karlsson, Marner (offer sheet) -- need to get 1/3 minimally, 2/3 ideal, 3/3 is impossible for cap reasons
And you have a solid top 9F and top 4D

rangers have solid depth defenseman options between Lindgren, Hajek, Rykov, etc. Maybe package Pionk with one of them and a earlyish pick for a potential top pairing RHD


the rangers have 0 top end talent and have only announced a rebuild 9 months ago. Lundqvist is going to be 38 and we are not going to be competitive until contracts off the books. u want to trade assets to get rid of contracts ? for what reason we aren't going to competitive whats the hurry to get rid of them. rebuilds last 3-5 years.
Feb. 5, 2019 at 2:48 p.m.
#22
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Edited Feb. 5, 2019 at 2:57 p.m.
Quoting: buchnevichh
the rangers have 0 top end talent and have only announced a rebuild 9 months ago. Lundqvist is going to be 38 and we are not going to be competitive until contracts off the books. u want to trade assets to get rid of contracts ? for what reason we aren't going to competitive whats the hurry to get rid of them. rebuilds last 3-5 years.


Well Zibanejad has played himself into a top end talent, and we have Kravtsov (ranked #1 by tsn's top 50 NHL affiliated prospects) and Shestyorkin (ranked number 10). Rangers need a top end winger (Panarin via Free Agency or Marner via offer sheet) and a top 4 RHD (Trouba via trade [considering he's really been against signing long term in Wpg]) and you have a pretty damn good team

Panarin-Zibanejad-Kravtsov
Kreider-Chytil-Buchnevich
Namestnikov-Andersson- (the top 10 draft pick this year)
Nieves-Howden-Fast
Skjei-Trouba
Miller-DeAngelo
Lindgren-Rykov

Lundqvist-Shestyorkin

Will this team win the cup next year? No-- but it sets it up nicely for the following year, and this isn't taking into account the potential return for Hayes/Zucc/McQuaid/Claesson. The team as listed above most likely makes the playoffs (i'm assuming Pionk and Hajek was included in trouba deal plus some picks)

edit:

if the rangers can manage to clear 25-30m in cap, they can realistically go after Panarin, Marner and Trouba

Staal: 5.7 (buyout would cost 2.6m
Smith: 4.4
Namestnikov: 4
Strome: 3.1
Vesey: 2.3
Shattenkirk: 6.7
Zucc- 4.5
Hayes-5.2
McQuaid- 2.8

the total here is over 38m, obviously rangers may have to retain and staals buyout would cost less than 3. Rangers should end up with around 28m in cap space after elc or cheap fill ins (Lindgren, Rykov, Kravtsov, Andersson, Nieves, Miller, DeAngelo, etc)
Feb. 5, 2019 at 9:45 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: Spanky227
Well Zibanejad has played himself into a top end talent, and we have Kravtsov (ranked #1 by tsn's top 50 NHL affiliated prospects) and Shestyorkin (ranked number 10). Rangers need a top end winger (Panarin via Free Agency or Marner via offer sheet) and a top 4 RHD (Trouba via trade [considering he's really been against signing long term in Wpg]) and you have a pretty damn good team

Panarin-Zibanejad-Kravtsov
Kreider-Chytil-Buchnevich
Namestnikov-Andersson- (the top 10 draft pick this year)
Nieves-Howden-Fast
Skjei-Trouba
Miller-DeAngelo
Lindgren-Rykov

Lundqvist-Shestyorkin

Will this team win the cup next year? No-- but it sets it up nicely for the following year, and this isn't taking into account the potential return for Hayes/Zucc/McQuaid/Claesson. The team as listed above most likely makes the playoffs (i'm assuming Pionk and Hajek was included in trouba deal plus some picks)

edit:

if the rangers can manage to clear 25-30m in cap, they can realistically go after Panarin, Marner and Trouba

Staal: 5.7 (buyout would cost 2.6m
Smith: 4.4
Namestnikov: 4
Strome: 3.1
Vesey: 2.3
Shattenkirk: 6.7
Zucc- 4.5
Hayes-5.2
McQuaid- 2.8

the total here is over 38m, obviously rangers may have to retain and staals buyout would cost less than 3. Rangers should end up with around 28m in cap space after elc or cheap fill ins (Lindgren, Rykov, Kravtsov, Andersson, Nieves, Miller, DeAngelo, etc)


Lol, thats a pipe dream buddy, why buyout the last 2 years of a guys deal when we suck anyway and have the cap. Kravtsov ranking is completely made up. Rangers aren't coming anywhere near the playoffs for a couple years and I'm a ranger fan get real
Feb. 6, 2019 at 8:42 a.m.
#24
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: buchnevichh
Lol, thats a pipe dream buddy, why buyout the last 2 years of a guys deal when we suck anyway and have the cap. Kravtsov ranking is completely made up. Rangers aren't coming anywhere near the playoffs for a couple years and I'm a ranger fan get real


https://www.tsn.ca/top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1241869 -- yeah i totally made that up.. it's not from you know, canada's leading hockey network or anything.

Is it a pipe dream for all three mention? Yes, but 2/3 can be done easily. If you need to you buy them out-- who said buy them out if you can afford what you need to do to put a contending team out there?
Zibanejad, Chytil, Kravtsov and Shestyorkin all have the ability/potential to be "elite" players in the league (no it will not happen overnight). I'm not saying they'll be the best team in the league and will definitely win the cup, but they'll be a playoff team and have a chance if they make two key moves.
Feb. 6, 2019 at 9:11 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: Spanky227
https://www.tsn.ca/top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1241869 -- yeah i totally made that up.. it's not from you know, canada's leading hockey network or anything.

Is it a pipe dream for all three mention? Yes, but 2/3 can be done easily. If you need to you buy them out-- who said buy them out if you can afford what you need to do to put a contending team out there?
Zibanejad, Chytil, Kravtsov and Shestyorkin all have the ability/potential to be "elite" players in the league (no it will not happen overnight). I'm not saying they'll be the best team in the league and will definitely win the cup, but they'll be a playoff team and have a chance if they make two key moves.


years away still.. I'm looking to build a 2022 cup contender your looking to build a 2020 1st round exit
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll