SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How can the Leafs stay cap compliant without trading zaitsev

Created by: BCAPP
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 16, 2019
Published: Mar. 16, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team is NOT cap compliant with some generous assumptions for the Leafs:

1)This cap is at 83.5. First league estimate was 83, tsn recently estimated higher so I went with 83.5

2)Brown was traded for a cheap depth d. If he isn't there that spot may cost more with someone like Liljegren or the new NCAA guy.

3) Johnsson and Kapanen were both convinced to take a one year bridge to keep the cap hit down (note I think the number is fair for a one year bridge, I'm just not sure either are interested in a one year bridge)

4) Marner is signed to what I think I'd a fair deal relative to other wingers in the league. But many think he'll be closer to Matthews. I doubt marner signs before a bunch of the rfas this summer sign

Anyway even with those breaks for the Leafs still about a half mil over the cap.

From what I see the Leafs need 1-2 of the following to happen to be cap compliant

1) the cap to be more like 85 million than 83
2) trade zaitsev
3) trade 2 of brown/hyman/Kapanen/Johnsson

They could also do the following
1) trade Marleau/Marleau retire and trade the cap hit. Doubt this one happens
2) trade Nylander. Doubt this happens
3) trade Kadri. This would be very stupid. He had the second best contract on the team. Plus if he is traded there is no center depth for injury
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$9,616,000
2$700,000
1$2,250,000
1$2,250,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Veteran, Low paid
1$800,000
Veteran, Low paid
1$800,000
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$78,370,699$0$20,000$5,129,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$9,616,000$9,616,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$720,000$720,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Veteran, Low paid
$800,000$800,000
Veteran, Low paid
$800,000$800,000

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:07 p.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,438
Likes: 22,639
I think it is unreasonable that Kapanen and Johnsson are forced to take crappy deals just because the Leafs have overpaid other players. I don't see why it has to be Zaitsev that is traded since the Leafs don't have a viable replacement. IMO, it's Nylander and his 6.9m cap hit that is traded. Maybe a Kadri/Brown combo. Still optimistic a retired Marleau is most of the solution.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:11 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,148
Likes: 2,223
Edited Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:18 p.m.
I agree that Z isn't the odd man out; it's funny how everyone says the Leafs need a RHD so desperately that they'll trade for other teams middle pair Dmen, at a high cost and than "pay" to dump Z to another team, that sounds counter productive and foolish. The Leafs have an alright track record at finding unsigned/undrafted gems; Z, Rosen, Oz, Bergman and Duszak. Plus they also have Lilly, Sandin, Hollowell, Lindgren, Kral and Rasanen drafted, so trades might not be the solution because their is no problem with the D corps depth.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: palhal
I think it is unreasonable that Kapanen and Johnsson are forced to take crappy deals just because the Leafs have overpaid other players. I don't see why it has to be Zaitsev that is traded since the Leafs don't have a viable replacement. IMO, it's Nylander and his 6.9m cap hit that is traded. Maybe a Kadri/Brown combo. Still optimistic a retired Marleau is most of the solution.


Because Zaitsev is terrible and Nylander isn't. Dubas said he isn't interested in trading his high end skilled players, why should he be now? There are many ways to still trade Zaitsev and get replacements for him (not that hard to replace him when he isn't playing well and is used in the wrong role anyways). Ben Lovejoy could be a cheap free agent to replace him and perform better in that role. Boom. that wasn't hard to replace. Get off your Nylander-out train that you've been on. He's not going anywhere.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:22 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,381
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: palhal
I think it is unreasonable that Kapanen and Johnsson are forced to take crappy deals just because the Leafs have overpaid other players. I don't see why it has to be Zaitsev that is traded since the Leafs don't have a viable replacement. IMO, it's Nylander and his 6.9m cap hit that is traded. Maybe a Kadri/Brown combo. Still optimistic a retired Marleau is most of the solution.


Oh I think Kapanen and Johnsson will do better if they take the bridge but that's there decision.

Let's say Johnsson. He could probably get 3.35 x 4 or so. 13.4 million over 4 years
Or he takes a 2.25 bridge. If he plays as well as he did this year then he can probably get 4.25x4 so if looking at those same 4 years he would get 15 million... Bridges are gambles on yourself...

Apparently Dubas has told Nylander see he won't be trading him, but of course that has only so much value

As I have said elsewhere. Trading Kadri is stupid. Kadri is worth about 6.5 million on the open market (repeat 30 goal scoring center that can play all situations, can play shutdown center, and is good in the dot), he is paid 4.6 for term through his prime. Center depth is a huge strength of this team right now. Trading Kadri nukes that.

Once marner signs some huge contract, Reilly, Kadri, and Andersen become the Leafs best value contracts.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:23 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,381
Likes: 3,695
Edited Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:32 p.m.. Reason: Quoted the wrong post
Quoting: jonesryan
Because Zaitsev is terrible and Nylander isn't. Dubas said he isn't interested in trading his high end skilled players, why should he be now? There are many ways to still trade Zaitsev and get replacements for him (not that hard to replace him when he isn't playing well and is used in the wrong role anyways). Ben Lovejoy could be a cheap free agent to replace him and perform better in that role. Boom. that wasn't hard to replace. Get off your Nylander-out train that you've been on. He's not going anywhere.


Also depending on Marleau retiring is quite the reach. Mr ironman has shown no sign of wanting to stop
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:31 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,381
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
I agree that Z isn't the odd man out; it's funny how everyone says the Leafs need a RHD so desperately that they'll trade for other teams middle pair Dmen, at a high cost and than "pay" to dump Z to another team, that sounds counter productive and foolish. The Leafs have an alright track record at finding unsigned/undrafted gems; Z, Rosen, Oz, Bergman and Duszak. Plus they also have Lilly, Sandin, Hollowell, Lindgren, Kral and Rasanen drafted, so trades might not be the solution because their is no problem with the D corps depth.


Of those unsigned "gems" one is an NHLer. That's zaitsev (2 if you include ozi). The rest are question marks.

The Leafs have signed tonnes of undrafted free agents in the last decade, there have been three successes from what I can remember. Bozak, Scrivens and zaitsev.

The list from memory includes:
Bozak, frogren, Hansen, ozhiganov, Rosen, Borgman, Duszak, Lindholm, Aaltonen, Soshnikov, Gustavsson, rynnas, Scrivens, and like 10 guys who's name I can't even remember....
Mar. 16, 2019 at 2:47 p.m.
#7
AustonFathews
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 320
Likes: 74
Quoting: palhal
I think it is unreasonable that Kapanen and Johnsson are forced to take crappy deals just because the Leafs have overpaid other players. I don't see why it has to be Zaitsev that is traded since the Leafs don't have a viable replacement. IMO, it's Nylander and his 6.9m cap hit that is traded. Maybe a Kadri/Brown combo. Still optimistic a retired Marleau is most of the solution.


Man, some Leafs fans and their hate for Nylander.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 3:28 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 35
Likes: 4
Don’t agree with your thinking that trading Kadri is stupid, think his great contract with three years remaining means the return should be in line with what you are selling! If I had to pick between a 29 year old Kadri who plays behind two studs and can be replaced by Nylander and a 22 year old Nylander the choice for me would easily be to keep Nylander. Kadri is a opportunistic and aggressive player who has scored 30 goals two years in a row, he may do that again but not as the third line center for the leafs, he is a luxury and I believe needs to go either now or later when we need cap space. That does not take away from his value or the great return you would demand
GenXHockey and OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 3:32 p.m.
#9
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Zaitsev just may need to be moved but he also needs to be replaced so you are still going to have to move a skilled player to get one back. All this talk of how horrible zaitsev is but he plays the most difficult minutes of all leafs defencemen.

Dubas has some sort of plan in mind evident by picking up Muzzin as soon as he knew what mathews number was. Not sure what the plan is but I know one thing if we escape with only moving brown and zaitsev it would be a miracle. The 6m would make the money work but who would replace zaitsev?
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 3:48 p.m.
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,438
Likes: 22,639
Edited Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:12 p.m.
Quoting: notKyleDUbas123
Man, some Leafs fans and their hate for Nylander.


No, it's love of needed cap space. Leafs do have replacement wingers, but they don't have a replacement at RHD if Zaitsev is traded. I have seen just one Zaitsev trade that makes sense to the Leafs and the other team.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,438
Likes: 22,639
Quoting: BCAPP
Oh I think Kapanen and Johnsson will do better if they take the bridge but that's there decision.

Let's say Johnsson. He could probably get 3.35 x 4 or so. 13.4 million over 4 years
Or he takes a 2.25 bridge. If he plays as well as he did this year then he can probably get 4.25x4 so if looking at those same 4 years he would get 15 million... Bridges are gambles on yourself...

Apparently Dubas has told Nylander see he won't be trading him, but of course that has only so much value

As I have said elsewhere. Trading Kadri is stupid. Kadri is worth about 6.5 million on the open market (repeat 30 goal scoring center that can play all situations, can play shutdown center, and is good in the dot), he is paid 4.6 for term through his prime. Center depth is a huge strength of this team right now. Trading Kadri nukes that.

Once marner signs some huge contract, Reilly, Kadri, and Andersen become the Leafs best value contracts.


If Kadri is traded, then Nylander becomes a centre. I'm more concerned if offer sheets would come in for Kapanen and Johnsson this year or next year if the Leafs tried a low ball bridge.
Let's get over this notion that Kadri was a 30 goal scoring centre. Believed he scored 13 of this goals per season as the LW on the PP replacing Hyman. Hey, I don't want to lose Kadri or Nylander due to cap reasons, but that is the problem the Leafs created when they signed UFA Tavares, overpaid Nylander and Matthews, and the emergence of Marner, Kapanen and Johnsson as better players and therefore gotta be paid more than was expected. Plus Muzzin on the team next year and the unknown Marleau situation.
Other teams over the years have had to trade good players for cap reasons....maybe it's the Leaf turn. Tampa and Jets are in the same situation this summer. San Jose won't be be able to have the same roster as they have this year. So, I don't think the Leafs fans should think this is a unique situation the Leaf are in.
If Johnsson takes as bridge as you suggest and then is entitled 4.25m the following seasons, how are the Leafs better off? Now where is this cap coming from as other players will be wanting raises too. Gee to think Reilly and Andersson have just two years left on their deals.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:04 p.m.
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
The bottom line is that trading Zaitsev as an economic solution works if a lesser-priced roughly-equivalent d-man comes back; as a pure cap dump, it makes little sense as @palhal @Jamiepo and @draft_em_sign_em_trade_em have all said.
palhal liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:11 p.m.
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,438
Likes: 22,639
Edited Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:29 p.m.
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The bottom line is that trading Zaitsev as an economic solution works if a lesser-priced roughly-equivalent d-man comes back; as a pure cap dump, it makes little sense as @palhal @Jamiepo and @draft_em_sign_em_trade_em have all said.


Well said. Let's imagine the Leafs trade Zaitsev and his 4.5m with no money returned and sign a UFA equivalent for 2.5m, the Leafs only save 2m...nice but Leafs need cap relief then that. Plus really what the chances of trading the entire 4.5m Zaitsev and his full contract. The other factor is this magical 2,5m replacement. If he is so good, gee he should sign a 4m contract with the team that just traded for Zaitsev.
I really don't understand all this distain for Zaitsev (and Hainsey). And to think there are viable replacements at a much lesser cap hit....problematic.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 4:32 p.m.
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: palhal
Well said. Let's imagine the Leafs trade Zaitsev and his 4.5m with no money returned and sign a UFA equivalent for 2.5m, the Leafs only save 2m...nice but Leafs need cap relief then that. Plus really what the chances of trading the entire 4.5m Zaitsev and his full contract. The other factor is this magical 2,5m replacement. If he is so good, gee he should sign a 4m contract with the team that just traded for Zaitsev.
I really don't understand all this distain for Zaitsev (and Hainsey). And to think there are viable replacements are a much lesser cap hit....problematic.


To reinforce your point, let's look at three prominent D free-agent signings from last summer: Calvin DeHaan, Ian Cole and Greg Pateryn. The first two have almost identical stats to Zaitsev and their cap hits are $4.55M and $4.25M respectively. Greg Pateryn, on the other hand, is the magic $2.25M cap hit d-man we're all hoping will ride to the rescue. He's 0-5 for 5 points and a minus 7 on the year, and many Wild fans consider this signing a bust. I know I'm high on Nick Jensen and Scott Mayfield, and lately Markus Nutivaara, but there is a serious risk that any of them could wilt under the additional pressure of getting #1 or #2 pairing assignments opposite Rielly or Muzzin.
palhal liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 6:33 p.m.
#15
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,438
Likes: 22,639
Quoting: OldNYIfan


I thought Jensen was brilliant signing by Washington. They paid maybe even an overpay to get him, but then they signed up to a modest 2.5m X 4m contract. Jensen had never made much money by professional athlete standards by just couldn't turn down a guaranteed 10m, instead of waiting till the summer.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 7:06 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,381
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Leaffan57
Don’t agree with your thinking that trading Kadri is stupid, think his great contract with three years remaining means the return should be in line with what you are selling! If I had to pick between a 29 year old Kadri who plays behind two studs and can be replaced by Nylander and a 22 year old Nylander the choice for me would easily be to keep Nylander. Kadri is a opportunistic and aggressive player who has scored 30 goals two years in a row, he may do that again but not as the third line center for the leafs, he is a luxury and I believe needs to go either now or later when we need cap space. That does not take away from his value or the great return you would demand


So you trade Kadri who as you admit is an incredible contract (when we have cap issues) and run Matthews/Tavares/Nylander. Great. What do you do when there is an injury? I guess we have Marleau, but he is gone in a year, and frankly not that good. Having Nylander on the wing is an incredible luxury, one I would want to keep.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 7:13 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,148
Likes: 2,223
Edited Mar. 16, 2019 at 7:31 p.m.
Quoting: BCAPP
So you trade Kadri who as you admit is an incredible contract (when we have cap issues) and run Matthews/Tavares/Nylander. Great. What do you do when there is an injury? I guess we have Marleau, but he is gone in a year, and frankly not that good. Having Nylander on the wing is an incredible luxury, one I would want to keep.


Kadri will not be having any more 30 goal seasons with the Leafs, in fact he might not be hitting the 50-60 point mark anytime with his remaining years, a great contract IF he was a 2nd line C, an average contract as a 3rd C. But easily tradable with a good return for a team in desperate need of a 2nd C, the Pens survived trading Staal (and than his replacement Sutter and than won 2 Cups without an awesome 3rd C) and the Leaf will too if they trade Kadri.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 8:31 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,381
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Kadri will not be having any more 30 goal seasons with the Leafs, in fact he might not be hitting the 50-60 point mark anytime with his remaining years, a great contract IF he was a 2nd line C, an average contract as a 3rd C. But easily tradable with a good return for a team in desperate need of a 2nd C, the Pens survived trading Staal (and than his replacement Sutter and than won 2 Cups without an awesome 3rd C) and the Leaf will too if they trade Kadri.


The pens actually couldn't win until they got Bonino to be their third c. Then he left and they didn't win again.

Besides you didn't answer. What happens when one of matthews/Nylander/Tavares gets injured?
Mar. 16, 2019 at 10:53 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,148
Likes: 2,223
Quoting: BCAPP
The pens actually couldn't win until they got Bonino to be their third c. Then he left and they didn't win again.

Besides you didn't answer. What happens when one of matthews/Nylander/Tavares gets injured?


Yes but Bonino wasn't a 4 million $ player during those Cup runs, he was a cheap 2 million 3rd C.
Mar. 16, 2019 at 11:47 p.m.
#20
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: palhal


Jensen was the cornerstone of my master plan for Toronto this summer. I'm now sorry I was so prescient about his value.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll