SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

RNH and Trouba

Created by: DirtyDangles
Team: 2019-20 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 10, 2019
Published: Apr. 10, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$800,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,750,000
8$6,750,000
3$4,750,000
2$3,650,000
8$7,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. 2019 1st round pick (PHI)
2.
PHI
  1. Trouba, Jacob [RFA Rights]
WPG
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. 2019 3rd round pick (PHI)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2020
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2021
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,000,000$73,963,888$0$2,995,000$9,036,112
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,137,500$4,137,500
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,333,333$4,333,333
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$863,333$863,333
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
UFA - 6
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$678,889$678,889
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,345,000$2,345,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$700,000$700,000
LD, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:23 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
RNH had 69 pts .... perhaps his elevated numbers are more based on him reaching his prime value despite being saddled to Lucic 5v5 all season

Should the flyers deal Couturier based on his number prior to 2017-2018??


Come on bud, you know the only reason he got 69 points was due to elevated scoring and way more PP points. 38% of his points were PP points tears of joy Oh and he only spent about 12% on a line with Lucic 5v5...he did however spend 17% with McDavid.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:25 p.m.
#27
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Here I can show just a few stats as well...

https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/frozenpool_compare.php?players%5B%5D=2900&players%5B%5D=2890&period=2018-2019%3AR%3A99

Just because he is thier 3rd best player, doesn't mean he is worth more. Who is OTT's 3rd best player? Is he worth a top 10 pick?


How does OTT factor in to this ?? And if that player is Brannstrom im not trading him for PHI's pick which is 11OV ..... not a top 10.

Also expand your data beyond a single season, look at Couturiers most common linemates. They are both solid players neither of which should be dealt for a 1st rounder
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:29 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
How does OTT factor in to this ?? And if that player is Brannstrom im not trading him for PHI's pick which is 11OV ..... not a top 10.

Also expand your data beyond a single season, look at Couturiers most common linemates. They are both solid players neither of which should be dealt for a 1st rounder


I'm done here. You Oilers fans thinking RNH is even remotely close to Couts is laughable.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:39 p.m.
#29
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Come on bud, you know the only reason he got 69 points was due to elevated scoring and way more PP points. 38% of his points were PP points tears of joy Oh and he only spent about 12% on a line with Lucic 5v5...he did however spend 17% with McDavid.


You sure about those numbers...... or did you pull them from the last game which Lucic played??
Cause i'm getting something much different at leftwing lock

As for the points it shouldnt matter where he is producing them when the whole point is EDM does not have the depth to deal there 3rd best player.
For someone advocating a trade for RNH you dont seem to put much value on the player
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:42 p.m.
#30
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
You sure about those numbers...... or did you pull them from the last game which Lucic played??
Cause i'm getting something much different at leftwing lock

As for the points it shouldnt matter where he is producing them when the whole point is EDM does not have the depth to deal there 3rd best player.
For someone advocating a trade for RNH you dont seem to put much value on the player


The 11th overall pick is quite valuable...
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:47 p.m.
#31
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The 11th overall pick is quite valuable...


Sooo as i said at 5v5 RNH had Lucic as a linemate more often than McD according to Dobbers line frequencies
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:52 p.m.
#32
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The 11th overall pick is quite valuable...


Find a comparable trade that involved the 10th-12th pick.

The Trade you are suggesting is a 69pt 2nd line Center in exchange for a 1st round pick (no salary retained, no players returned)
Apr. 10, 2019 at 12:56 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
Find a comparable trade that involved the 10th-12th pick.

The Trade you are suggesting is a 69pt 2nd line Center in exchange for a 1st round pick (no salary retained, no players returned)


I was unaware that there has to be a trade sometime in the past that matches this one! And quit saying he is a 69 point player, he has done it once and only because of McDavid and Draisaitl.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:05 p.m.
#34
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I was unaware that there has to be a trade sometime in the past that matches this one! And quit saying he is a 69 point player, he has done it once and only because of McDavid and Draisaitl.


No i'm telling you to find a comparable so you can show there is at least some level of justification to promote the deal. Sadly there is no comparables and your trade is foolish no matter how many times you say the 11th is valuable. It is valuable but not on the level of a 69pt player...

Is Claude Giroux not a 100pt player because hes only done it once, same logic goes for Leon Draisaitl. Does accomplishing something only once take away from the importance of the act?
CD282 liked this.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:08 p.m.
#35
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
No i'm telling you to find a comparable so you can show there is at least some level of justification to promote the deal. Sadly there is no comparables and your trade is foolish no matter how many times you say the 11th is valuable. It is valuable but not on the level of a 69pt player...

Is Claude Giroux not a 100pt player because hes only done it once, same logic goes for Leon Draisaitl. Does accomplishing something only once take away from the importance of the act?


No Giroux isn't a 100 pt player, he is more of a 75-90 point player. And Draisaitl without playing with McDavid would be the same.

As for a comparable, you have Schenn, traded for a top 10 protected first, #28 OA and a cap dump in Lehtera. That is pretty similar. So we add a B prospect or 3rd I guess and we are pretty well there.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:19 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,760
Likes: 7,635
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I was unaware that there has to be a trade sometime in the past that matches this one! And quit saying he is a 69 point player, he has done it once and only because of McDavid and Draisaitl.


laugh

If you took Giroux & Voracek away from Couterier... and Draisaitl & McDavid away from Nugent-Hopkins, guess who is the better player? Hint: not the guy from Phoenix.

Couterier w/o Giroux w/o Voracek

38.29 CF%
38.46 FF%
42.42 SF%
43.75 GF%
33.96 xGF%
1.007 PDO

Nugent-Hopkins w/o McDavid w/o Draisaitl

43.02 CF% +4.73
42.14 FF% +3.68
42.20 SF% -0.22
47.27 GF% +3.52
42.15 xGF% +8.19
1.018 PDO -0.011
RWellington liked this.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:19 p.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 390
Quoting: DirtyDangles
You could make it Dzingel instead and not be able to get a 3rd player, which is fine. At least Dzingel can skate with McDavid unlike anyone you have put at RW this year.

You don't seem to understand that you have next to no prospects. I guess I would be nervous about getting good picks as well since my organization has no clue how to develop players and kills their careers before they get started. Keep playing Kassian at 1RW...that will really make McDavid want to stay!


Next to no prospects: Yamamoto, Benson, Marody, Maksimov, McLeod, 1st rounder this year, 2nd rounder this year, Jones, Bear, Bouchard, Lagesson, Starrett, Hawkey, Skinner.

We've got a full AHL team of prospects. Not sure what you're referring to. It's clear you know nothing about the Oilers.

Point is, Oilers are better off having: McDavid/Draisaitl/Nuge/(Dzingel)/all our prospects/ than McDavid/Draisaitl/Ennis/Donskoi lmao
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:31 p.m.
#38
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Next to no prospects: Yamamoto, Benson, Marody, Maksimov, McLeod, 1st rounder this year, 2nd rounder this year, Jones, Bear, Bouchard, Lagesson, Starrett, Hawkey, Skinner.

We've got a full AHL team of prospects. Not sure what you're referring to. It's clear you know nothing about the Oilers.

Point is, Oilers are better off having: McDavid/Draisaitl/Nuge/(Dzingel)/all our prospects/ than McDavid/Draisaitl/Ennis/Donskoi lmao


Did you miss where I put Dzingel in over Donskoi? Which of those prospects are top prospects that will actually be impact players in the NHL...Bouchard, 2019 1st and maybe Yamamoto and Benson.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:34 p.m.
#39
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: CD282
laugh

If you took Giroux & Voracek away from Couterier... and Draisaitl & McDavid away from Nugent-Hopkins, guess who is the better player? Hint: not the guy from Phoenix.

Couterier w/o Giroux w/o Voracek

38.29 CF%
38.46 FF%
42.42 SF%
43.75 GF%
33.96 xGF%
1.007 PDO

Nugent-Hopkins w/o McDavid w/o Draisaitl

43.02 CF% +4.73
42.14 FF% +3.68
42.20 SF% -0.22
47.27 GF% +3.52
42.15 xGF% +8.19
1.018 PDO -0.011


And this is exactly why you can't only believe in advanced stats. Anyone who says RNH is better than Couturier is brain dead.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:34 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 390
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Did you miss where I put Dzingel in over Donskoi? Which of those prospects are top prospects that will actually be impact players in the NHL...Bouchard, 2019 1st and maybe Yamamoto and Benson.


Exactly, not all of them has to turn out. Add Draisaitl/McDavid/Nuge/Benson/yamamoto/2019 1st - top 6 for the future. Add Bouchard to Klefbom/Larsson/Nurse - top 4 for the future. Then we still have 2019 2nd + McLeod + Jones + Bear. No need to be paying for FAs nor trading core players to sign these guys. We could use a Dzingel for 3 years but he'd want more than that and that's not worth it to the Oilers. Not worth losing Nuge over.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:35 p.m.
#41
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
No Giroux isn't a 100 pt player, he is more of a 75-90 point player. And Draisaitl without playing with McDavid would be the same.

As for a comparable, you have Schenn, traded for a top 10 protected first, #28 OA and a cap dump in Lehtera. That is pretty similar. So we add a B prospect or 3rd I guess and we are pretty well there.


Soooo the trade isnt comparable as it doesnt fit the parameters you laid out in the initial proposal.

Thats quite the range on Giroux easier just to call him 100pt guy
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:35 p.m.
#42
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Exactly, not all of them has to turn out. Add Draisaitl/McDavid/Nuge/Benson/yamamoto/2019 1st - top 6 for the future. Add Bouchard to Klefbom/Larsson/Nurse - top 4 for the future. Then we still have 2019 2nd + McLeod + Jones + Bear. No need to be paying for FAs nor trading core players to sign these guys. We could use a Dzingel for 3 years but he'd want more than that and that's not worth it to the Oilers. Not worth losing Nuge over.


By the time that is your top 6 and top 4 McDavid will have told you to fk off and have been traded.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 1:36 p.m.
#43
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
Soooo the trade isnt comparable as it doesnt fit the parameters you laid out in the initial proposal.

Thats quite the range on Giroux easier just to call him 100pt guy


I gave you a range because that is what he has done...if you want to scrap the 100 point seasons we can call Draisaitl a 75 point player.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 2:05 p.m.
#44
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I gave you a range because that is what he has done...if you want to scrap the 100 point seasons we can call Draisaitl a 75 point player.


No you are once again missing the point and avoiding answering the actual questions because you are being taken to the woodshed over this AGM.

There is no precedence to suggest trading RNH for the 11OV is fair value.
There is no logic on EDMs side to making a deal like you've suggested regardless of your perceived value associated to that pick. Philly absolutely may chase a player like RNH and it would cost them the 1st ++ but EDM is in no place to trade a key piece for a future player. You respond to other posters about McD wanting out because he wont wait for the prospects to develop yet you advocate removing real NHL for prospects. You have no consistency or logic
CD282 liked this.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 2:26 p.m.
#45
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
No you are once again missing the point and avoiding answering the actual questions because you are being taken to the woodshed over this AGM.

There is no precedence to suggest trading RNH for the 11OV is fair value.
There is no logic on EDMs side to making a deal like you've suggested regardless of your perceived value associated to that pick. Philly absolutely may chase a player like RNH and it would cost them the 1st ++ but EDM is in no place to trade a key piece for a future player. You respond to other posters about McD wanting out because he wont wait for the prospects to develop yet you advocate removing real NHL for prospects. You have no consistency or logic


You remove RNH, and add in other NHLers while adding a very good prospect. Not hard logic to follow. Again, I was unaware that there had to be precedent for making a trade...my logic and it's consistancy has been here the whole time. You just choose to ignore it because you think your players are fantastic when in reality it is McDavid who makes them look better than they are. And yes McDavid is going to want out after next season goes the same way as this season where he has to play with a guy like Kassian or Chaisson. Have fun in the basement bud, you are about to be there for a very long time! Which is absolutely pathetic since you have had 4 1st overall picks in the past 8 drafts.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 3:05 p.m.
#46
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
You remove RNH, and add in other NHLers while adding a very good prospect. Not hard logic to follow. Again, I was unaware that there had to be precedent for making a trade...my logic and it's consistancy has been here the whole time. You just choose to ignore it because you think your players are fantastic when in reality it is McDavid who makes them look better than they are. And yes McDavid is going to want out after next season goes the same way as this season where he has to play with a guy like Kassian or Chaisson. Have fun in the basement bud, you are about to be there for a very long time! Which is absolutely pathetic since you have had 4 1st overall picks in the past 8 drafts.


I'm going to dissect this bit by bit because i don't know how bright you are.

1. "You remove RNH, and add in other NHLers while adding a very good prospect. Not hard logic to follow." Who on the market can EDM sign that can provide similar point production while playing the same position for $6M ??? The moment you trade away RNH you are now hunting for his replacement because the Oilers do not have him in the system nor do they have the cap space to spend big dollars in free agency. I'm well aware of what you think you receive by trading away RNH but i dont think you understand what you lose by trading away a 69pt 2nd line Center.

2. I was unaware that there had to be precedent for making a trade Precedence shows that there is history on your side; however; you lack to provide any amount which is part of the reason why i think you are clueless

3. you think your players are fantastic when in reality it is McDavid who makes them look better than they are Do people suggest trading Point because he plays with Kucherov ? Some Oilers fans understand that the team has consistently undervalued actual NHL talent while overvaluing prospects thereby creating a revolving door where NHL players leave and we are forced to watch the learning game. These same Oiler fans value RNH as the 2nd line C he is and we arent going to accept 75 cents on the dollar. McD is an amazing player and he makes most everybody around him better but that doesnt mean EDM is gonna undervalue a key piece in their lineup. Also understand there is a real sensitivity to EDM dealing players when you look back through the past years of trades, so we will be skeptical of ALL offers

4. And yes McDavid is going to want out after next season goes the same way as this season where he has to play with a guy like Kassian or Chaisson. By trading RNH you assume EDM will land all the top free agents along side McD?? Doubtful so how about add where you can with what you can, offload some deadweight (Russell Lucic) so that McD doesnt have to play with Kassian or Chaisson. RNH and McD are close teammates & Friends how do you think he would enjoy another good friend being dealt.

5. Have fun in the basement bud, you are about to be there for a very long time! Which is absolutely pathetic since you have had 4 1st overall picks in the past 8 drafts Couple things, I dont actually run the Oilers ( i wish i did, i would have done things quite differently ) and speaking of basements you should probably leave your moms basement and catch some fresh air, all the philly cheese farts are starting to rot your brain.
CD282 liked this.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#47
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
I'm going to dissect this bit by bit because i don't know how bright you are.

1. "You remove RNH, and add in other NHLers while adding a very good prospect. Not hard logic to follow." Who on the market can EDM sign that can provide similar point production while playing the same position for $6M ??? The moment you trade away RNH you are now hunting for his replacement because the Oilers do not have him in the system nor do they have the cap space to spend big dollars in free agency. I'm well aware of what you think you receive by trading away RNH but i dont think you understand what you lose by trading away a 69pt 2nd line Center.

2. I was unaware that there had to be precedent for making a trade Precedence shows that there is history on your side; however; you lack to provide any amount which is part of the reason why i think you are clueless

3. you think your players are fantastic when in reality it is McDavid who makes them look better than they are Do people suggest trading Point because he plays with Kucherov ? Some Oilers fans understand that the team has consistently undervalued actual NHL talent while overvaluing prospects thereby creating a revolving door where NHL players leave and we are forced to watch the learning game. These same Oiler fans value RNH as the 2nd line C he is and we arent going to accept 75 cents on the dollar. McD is an amazing player and he makes most everybody around him better but that doesnt mean EDM is gonna undervalue a key piece in their lineup. Also understand there is a real sensitivity to EDM dealing players when you look back through the past years of trades, so we will be skeptical of ALL offers

4. And yes McDavid is going to want out after next season goes the same way as this season where he has to play with a guy like Kassian or Chaisson. By trading RNH you assume EDM will land all the top free agents along side McD?? Doubtful so how about add where you can with what you can, offload some deadweight (Russell Lucic) so that McD doesnt have to play with Kassian or Chaisson. RNH and McD are close teammates & Friends how do you think he would enjoy another good friend being dealt.

5. Have fun in the basement bud, you are about to be there for a very long time! Which is absolutely pathetic since you have had 4 1st overall picks in the past 8 drafts Couple things, I dont actually run the Oilers ( i wish i did, i would have done things quite differently ) and speaking of basements you should probably leave your moms basement and catch some fresh air, all the philly cheese farts are starting to rot your brain.


1. You have some guy named Draisaitl who was drafted to be a C. Couldn't he replace RNH? You know just a thought...
2. Again just because there is no precedent doesn't mean it can't happen.
3. I do think Point is benefiting from Kucherov in a big way. Just like RNH did from his PP time with McD and Draisaitl.
4. Good luck moving Lucic. Nobody wants a slow moving, 30 year old, 4th liner who makes $6 mil per for another 4 years. Russell is basically not even an NHL D man and has a NMC and makes $4 per for 2 more years...good luck with those!
5. You would have drafted differently? You wouldn't have taken the consensus #1s? Sure bud!
Apr. 10, 2019 at 3:38 p.m.
#48
RW90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 824
Likes: 126
Quoting: DirtyDangles
1. You have some guy named Draisaitl who was drafted to be a C. Couldn't he replace RNH? You know just a thought...
2. Again just because there is no precedent doesn't mean it can't happen.
3. I do think Point is benefiting from Kucherov in a big way. Just like RNH did from his PP time with McD and Draisaitl.
4. Good luck moving Lucic. Nobody wants a slow moving, 30 year old, 4th liner who makes $6 mil per for another 4 years. Russell is basically not even an NHL D man and has a NMC and makes $4 per for 2 more years...good luck with those!
5. You would have drafted differently? You wouldn't have taken the consensus #1s? Sure bud!


1. Sure you could play Drai 2C now who plays LW wing with McD ? EDM is limited $$ in what they can spend
2. No it doesnt but it sure helps your case when precedence is on your side
3. You didnt answer the question, are people suggesting trading Point because he plays with Kucherov?
4. Lucic = buyout most likely & Russell is a NHL 3rd pair LHD overpaid but not buyout proof so i think youve missed the point there... again
5. Well considering i have the tweets to back it up i can safely say i would have drafted different (Hall, RNH, Murray, McD) but i was more referring to the bad trades that have taken place over the years.
Apr. 10, 2019 at 4:06 p.m.
#49
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: RWellington
1. Sure you could play Drai 2C now who plays LW wing with McD ? EDM is limited $$ in what they can spend
2. No it doesnt but it sure helps your case when precedence is on your side
3. You didnt answer the question, are people suggesting trading Point because he plays with Kucherov?
4. Lucic = buyout most likely & Russell is a NHL 3rd pair LHD overpaid but not buyout proof so i think youve missed the point there... again
5. Well considering i have the tweets to back it up i can safely say i would have drafted different (Hall, RNH, Murray, McD) but i was more referring to the bad trades that have taken place over the years.


1. Sign Dzingel...he has the speed to play with McDavid and will be cheaper than RNH. If Draisaitl is so good, lets see him carry his own line.
3. Comparing Point to RNH is dumb. Not the same situation at all.
4. Buying out Lucic is fine...doesn't help your cap a ton and likely won't let you acquire another top 6 player. Russell is worse than AMac so no he isn't an NHL player.

So basically you move RNH, get Dzingel and another maybe 3rd liner plus the #11 OA pick. Tell me again how EDM is worse off
Apr. 10, 2019 at 4:07 p.m.
#50
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Care to elaborate...


Dude Trouba isn't going to Philly, Too bad his 2 preferred destinations are Detroit and Florida. To either be near his family or fiancee.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll