SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Help for cup next year

Created by: DaBus
Team: 2019-20 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2019
Published: Apr. 16, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$1,500,000
7$8,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,150,000
1$2,000,000
1$950,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Faulk, Justin
  2. 2020 4th round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Add on a 4th in case Faulk does not resign
2.
TBL
  1. 2019 4th round pick (OTT)
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CBJ)
OTT
  1. Callahan, Ryan
  2. 2020 1st round pick (TBL)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,000,000$81,823,331$0$1,362,500$1,176,669
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$147,500$148K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,150,000$1,150,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 16, 2019 at 4:19 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 82
Likes: 23
Overall, not too bad, but the free agent signings kinda leave a bad taste in my mouth. DSP had one good playoff run, but is now in the minors, and you shouldn't pay Kruger $1M to be a backup. The Lightning have good (and cheaper) prospects, so I'd rather call them up and bump Joseph down to the 4th line instead of spending almost $2M for players who won't play every game. I do like your idea of bringing in Faulk to bolster the defense, but Cal Foote could be ready to play in a similar role. You could maybe wait until the trade deadline so you can assess Foote's play and if you still want to add, bringing in Faulk at the deadline would only require a few picks. Lastly, I get that they need cap space, but I'd rather move Gourde over Callahan or Miller. Miller is more proven/versatile, and although Callahan is kind of an anchor, he only has one year left and I think Gourde might get passed in the depth chart soon anyway by a prospect. Plus, you wouldn't have to give up a 1st to move Gourde.

I know calling up prospects can be risky, but the Lighting usually do a good job with it. Let me know what you think!
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:59 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
DaBus
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 489
Quoting: RinksideOps
Overall, not too bad, but the free agent signings kinda leave a bad taste in my mouth. DSP had one good playoff run, but is now in the minors, and you shouldn't pay Kruger $1M to be a backup. The Lightning have good (and cheaper) prospects, so I'd rather call them up and bump Joseph down to the 4th line instead of spending almost $2M for players who won't play every game. I do like your idea of bringing in Faulk to bolster the defense, but Cal Foote could be ready to play in a similar role. You could maybe wait until the trade deadline so you can assess Foote's play and if you still want to add, bringing in Faulk at the deadline would only require a few picks. Lastly, I get that they need cap space, but I'd rather move Gourde over Callahan or Miller. Miller is more proven/versatile, and although Callahan is kind of an anchor, he only has one year left and I think Gourde might get passed in the depth chart soon anyway by a prospect. Plus, you wouldn't have to give up a 1st to move Gourde.

I know calling up prospects can be risky, but the Lighting usually do a good job with it. Let me know what you think!


I like what you say, I traded Miller because he only has a M-NTC and Faulk could help for one year to let Foote develop a little more. Kruger would help for the 4th line a a cheap price for depth to make another cup run cause he brings good experience.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 12:28 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 82
Likes: 23
Quoting: DaBus
I like what you say, I traded Miller because he only has a M-NTC and Faulk could help for one year to let Foote develop a little more. Kruger would help for the 4th line a a cheap price for depth to make another cup run cause he brings good experience.


Good point. I guess they could scramble and try to dump Gourde before his contract kicks in July 1, but it might be harder to pull off. Also, that's a good point with Kruger about playoff experience (and I guess it also applies to DSP, but I think you could find someone better for a similar price). I just personally would rather not give up a 1st for nothing in return except cap space. I think this team can make a few more runs, and that pick could be a part of some in a few years, so I'd focus on saving money to stay under the cap without having to dump Callahan. That being said, if your position is that they only have 1 or 2 more runs left, then I think this roster is a great gamble.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll