SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

VAN-NJ-COL

Created by: TJTwolf
Team: 2018-19 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 17, 2019
Published: Apr. 17, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Done from Vancouver's PoV, although sure I'd love Pettersson on the Avs. I'd say the Vancouver/Colorado trade is more than fair, but what else do Vancouver need to add for 1st OA to unite the Hughes Brothers?

New Jersey do have a weakness on right D, so with Barrie, Vancouver would have a surplus there, or perhaps it takes Juolevi to get it done?
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Jost, Tyson
  3. 2019 1st round pick (OTT)
COL
  1. Pettersson, Elias
  2. 2019 2nd round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. 2019 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. 2019 1st round pick (VAN)
  2. 2019 1st round pick (OTT)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VAN
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
35$79,500,000$81,257,297$852,847$6,157,500-$1,757,297
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,475,000$1,475,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,366,666$3,366,666
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$836,667$836,667
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$885,833$885,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,133,750$5,133,750
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,520,700$1,520,700
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,325,000$2,325,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$362,500$362K)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$675,000$675,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 1,932
Stop its not happening
brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:22 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: Smitty426
Stop its not happening


Useful comment, thanks for looking in your crystal ball. You do realise everything on here is hypothetical, right?
Wqrrior liked this.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:28 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
I still think highly that Pettersson > Hughes
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,485
Likes: 11,900
Edited Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:34 p.m.
When NJ sees that Colorado got Pettersson out of the deal and gets mad and you have to throw Boeser in to get the trade to go through.

Look up the Eric Lindros trade. If you want to attribute Colorado's 2 cups to a single event the Lindros trade is it.

The Flyers never one a Cup with Lindros.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:32 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 435
@BlueSeeker exhibit A
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: kogger
@BlueSeeker exhibit A


Still not as crap as yours lol. Try again.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:35 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 435
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Still not as crap as yours lol. Try again
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Still not as crap as yours lol. Try again.


Mine offered a roster player a prospect and picks...50 year franchise...stay mad chump
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:35 p.m.
#8
Save Mcdavid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1,108
very bad for Vancouver how about just our pick Goldobin Virtanen and Boeser you could even add in horvat for all I care
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:37 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 1,932
Quoting: TJTwolf
Useful comment, thanks for looking in your crystal ball. You do realise everything on here is hypothetical, right?


My crystal ball?
What's hypothetical about a three team trade to land the sedins 2.0 to you guys?
You're right, armchair GM extraodinare you are!
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:38 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: kogger


You offered a bust, a maybe and a couple of mid picks. This guys offer is a lot closer in value. Are you upset that you cant find a more crap ACGM than yours? Please cry and tell mommy.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:41 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: Smitty426
My crystal ball?
What's hypothetical about a three team trade to land the sedins 2.0 to you guys?
You're right, armchair GM extraodinare you are!


Sedins 2.0 to who? I'm a Colorado fan if you read the description. Muppet! EVERYTHING on here is hypothetical!
BlueSeeker liked this.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:44 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 435
Quoting: BlueSeeker
You offered a bust, a maybe and a couple of mid picks. This guys offer is a lot closer in value. Are you upset that you cant find a more crap ACGM than yours? Please cry and tell mommy.


Zacha isn’t a bust tho, Hughes Horvat and Zacha for center depth is straight up nasty. You can go cry in your nucks pjs and jerk off to Bure (sorrey not sorrey)
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:44 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Edited Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:51 p.m.
Quoting: DRshnuckels87
very bad for Vancouver how about just our pick Goldobin Virtanen and Boeser you could even add in horvat for all I care


Not sure I'd say a very young centre, a 60 point attacking D and Hughes would be a very bad return for Vancouver for the cost of Pettersson and two first round draft picks that might or might not make it plus a second, all depends what's added by VAN to get the first, and of course how the players who get picked with the 4th, 10th and second round picks pan out.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:45 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: Wqrrior
I still think highly that Pettersson > Hughes


Quite possible. Hard to know. Only the future will tell on that one.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:48 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: kogger
Zacha isn’t a bust tho, Hughes Horvat and Zacha for center depth is straight up nasty. You can go cry in your nucks pjs and jerk off to Bure (sorrey not sorrey)


A top 10 pick who is a mediocre third line center is not a bust? Damn son you belong in the looney bin. There really should be a r*tard filter on this site for people like you lol.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:49 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: aedoran
When NJ sees that Colorado got Pettersson out of the deal and gets mad and you have to throw Boeser in to get the trade to go through.

Look up the Eric Lindros trade. If you want to attribute Colorado's 2 cups to a single event the Lindros trade is it.

The Flyers never one a Cup with Lindros.


I know all about the Lindros trade and the trade tree being an Avs fan. I take it you believe Boeser would be the part required to make the trade go? In which case it likely wouldn't.
Apr. 17, 2019 at 11:57 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 435
Quoting: BlueSeeker
A top 10 pick who is a mediocre third line center is not a bust? Damn son you belong in the looney bin. There really should be a r*tard filter on this site for people like you lol.


He’s a defensive center with offensive upside. Your fan base thinking 2 firsts or Petey and a 1st with ****ing Markstrom as a throw in will do it is straight up brain dead. Just quit you’ll never get Huncho Jack
Apr. 18, 2019 at 12:05 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: kogger
He’s a defensive center with offensive upside. Your fan base thinking 2 firsts or Petey and a 1st with ****ing Markstrom as a throw in will do it is straight up brain dead. Just quit you’ll never get Huncho Jack


Petey and a first would be enough to get the 1OA. I posted a ACGM with that trade and intelligent people agreed with it. Too bad you're too r*tarded to know what's a good trade and a bad trade. By the way just to reinforce the notion of you being a complete dumb s*it the guy that posted this ACGM is an Avs fan. You just love embarrassing yourself don't you?
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 18, 2019 at 12:19 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 435
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Petey and a first would be enough to get the 1OA. I posted a ACGM with that trade and intelligent people agreed with it. Too bad you're too r*tarded to know what's a good trade and a bad trade. By the way just to reinforce the notion of you being a complete dumb s*it the guy that posted this ACGM is an Avs fan. You just love embarrassing yourself don't you?


Stay mad kid You’ll never have a sedin 2.0 and be irrelevant for years to come. Have fun offering sutter to teams for no more than a 3d round pick and throwing in Demko and Fartstrom to “sweeten the pot”. Idc what an avs fan posts for AC GM, it’s easy for a fan of a team to post a mock up of another team without attachment to the teams vision. FYI Travis Green is trash
Apr. 18, 2019 at 12:20 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: kogger
Stay mad kid You’ll never have a sedin 2.0 and be irrelevant for years to come. Have fun offering sutter to teams for no more than a 3d round pick and throwing in Demko and Fartstrom to “sweeten the pot”. Idc what an avs fan posts for AC GM, it’s easy for a fan of a team to post a mock up of another team without attachment to the teams vision. FYI Travis Green is trash


Your maturity is really showing. Keep it up lol.
kogger liked this.
Apr. 18, 2019 at 12:48 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Gotta say this is all very entertaining for during the intervals & commercial breaks lol squinting with tongue out
Apr. 18, 2019 at 2:03 a.m.
#22
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
I just can't see these trades happening.
Apr. 18, 2019 at 3:57 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,485
Likes: 11,900
Quoting: TJTwolf
I know all about the Lindros trade and the trade tree being an Avs fan. I take it you believe Boeser would be the part required to make the trade go? In which case it likely wouldn't.


You're right because the trade will never happen. Vancouver has a much better chance if they offer Pettersson to NJ. Hughes and Kakko are the best 2 players in the draft after that the talent level drops. There is a good chance that Hughes and Kakko they can be as good or better than Pettersson but starting with the #3 pick the smart choice to take Pettersson over the picks. I'm sorry that it doesn't help Colorado get Pettersson but with your roster and 4th pick in this years draft I think Colorado will be just fine without Pettersson.
I do have one question are you European? The reason I ask is by the way you spell realise It is a correct spelling but it's not the way most North Americans spell it. Although it is more common to see it spell it in Europe.
Apr. 18, 2019 at 6:24 a.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: aedoran
You're right because the trade will never happen. Vancouver has a much better chance if they offer Pettersson to NJ. Hughes and Kakko are the best 2 players in the draft after that the talent level drops. There is a good chance that Hughes and Kakko they can be as good or better than Pettersson but starting with the #3 pick the smart choice to take Pettersson over the picks. I'm sorry that it doesn't help Colorado get Pettersson but with your roster and 4th pick in this years draft I think Colorado will be just fine without Pettersson.
I do have one question are you European? The reason I ask is by the way you spell realise It is a correct spelling but it's not the way most North Americans spell it. Although it is more common to see it spell it in Europe.


The trade is purely hypothetical, as is everything on here, though I agree, Pettersson (plus) would probably get the deal done easier for Vancouver, it's done from the Vancouver PoV but of course the idea is for the Avs to acquire Pettersson. The question was IF this trade were to be made, what would need to be added. In your opinion that is Boeser, which if I were the Vancouver GM I wouldn't do. Thank you for answering the question of what you think would need to be added. The issue with taking lower picks is of course what they turn out to be. Yes, the talent level is generally regarded as lower, though there are always the exceptions. The question really is whether or not your scouts see something to like that makes you believe 4th OA and 10th OA will give you two guys who will be lynchpins for the future.

Answering your question, I'm British not European. wink
aedoran liked this.
Apr. 18, 2019 at 6:25 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: brocklesnar
I just can't see these trades happening.


Most trades on here aren't going to happen. The question is what would be hypothetically needed to be added.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll