Each forward plays average 25-26 mins and each D man plays 30 mins. I think the forwards could do that but it would tire them out in the long run but 30 mins every game for a D man is really tough and i dont think they could keep that up for a full season. goaltenders would have no problems with the workload.
if you add one more forward and one more defenseman it becomes a lot more feasible (average 22.5 mins/game for forwards and 24 mins/game for D)
Id say 2 more forwards and 1 more dman. Keeping it at as, the players would get worn out very quickly imo
Quoting: moli92
Each forward plays average 25-26 mins and each D man plays 30 mins. I think the forwards could do that but it would tire them out in the long run but 30 mins every game for a D man is really tough and i dont think they could keep that up for a full season. goaltenders would have no problems with the workload.
if you add one more forward and one more defenseman it becomes a lot more feasible (average 22.5 mins/game for forwards and 24 mins/game for D)
0-82. If they go to three full lines, I bet they could be good. There’s gonna be two guys on the ice that are always gassed in this scenario. They give up 7 goals a game
0-82. If they go to three full lines, I bet they could be good. There’s gonna be two guys on the ice that are always gassed in this scenario. They give up 7 goals a game
The 3rd line will consist of any of the other forwards, I thought it was obvious .