SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Site Discussion

Cap Errors Megathread

Aug. 14, 2015 at 6:11 p.m.
#26
Ryan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2015
Posts: 328
Likes: 32
Quoting: dkm1156
Dylan Larkin is listed as the 1st overall 2014 pick. A bit confusing when looking at mock drafts


Thanks, fixed.
Aug. 15, 2015 at 4:11 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Matt Donovan is still listed as a UFA with the NYI. He signed with Buffalo July 1st: http://sabres.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=773545
Aug. 20, 2015 at 10:49 a.m.
#28
Follow CapFriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2015
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 555
Quoting: GabyGaby
Matt Donovan is still listed as a UFA with the NYI. He signed with Buffalo July 1st: http://sabres.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=773545


He has now been moved to Buffalo. Thanks!
Aug. 30, 2015 at 5:59 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
Small tweak noticed - Johnny Oduya will be a UFA after his contract expires, currently listed to become a RFA

Ricky
Aug. 30, 2015 at 11:31 p.m.
#30
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: Karr31
Small tweak noticed - Johnny Oduya will be a UFA after his contract expires, currently listed to become a RFA

Ricky

Thank you Ricky, now fixed
Dec. 21, 2015 at 5:10 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
Whenever I make a transaction, the players position on my depth chart change to the order they were when I first started the team. Example: MTL. Torrey Mitchell starts as center on the top line (highest row). I drag him to the fourth row (Line). Make a couple trades or some sort of transactions and the software shuffles Mitchell back to the first line. (Top row)

it's probably a small line of code that needs to be expanded on. I think its worth the effort as its pretty annoying and most people use the rows as a guide for their lines their projecting too.
Dec. 22, 2015 at 9:25 a.m.
#32
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
I'll be looking into this marco, thanks for the suggestion
Jan. 28, 2016 at 1:05 a.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
A couple small issues:

Jagr listed as centre.

In AGM 16-17, if you resign a player, trade him, reverse the trade, he is removed from your team. If you go back to try and resign him again, it says "This player has already been signed to your team" even though he isn't.
Jan. 29, 2016 at 1:34 a.m.
#34
Breadman got paid.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 553
Likes: 42
Yeah, same thing with Hayes. He should be listed as mainly a C, not a RW. Kevin Hayes, that is.
Jan. 29, 2016 at 3:11 a.m.
#35
Ryan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2015
Posts: 328
Likes: 32
Quoting: F50marco
A couple small issues:

Jagr listed as centre.

In AGM 16-17, if you resign a player, trade him, reverse the trade, he is removed from your team. If you go back to try and resign him again, it says "This player has already been signed to your team" even though he isn't.


Jagr fixed

Will look into that issue, thx

Quoting: DontTradeNash
Yeah, same thing with Hayes. He should be listed as mainly a C, not a RW. Kevin Hayes, that is.


Fixed, ty
Jan. 29, 2016 at 1:02 p.m.
#36
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: F50marco


In AGM 16-17, if you resign a player, trade him, reverse the trade, he is removed from your team. If you go back to try and resign him again, it says "This player has already been signed to your team" even though he isn't.


Thanks for pointing this out, it is now fixed
Jan. 31, 2016 at 7:14 p.m.
#37
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: F50marco
Whenever I make a transaction, the players position on my depth chart change to the order they were when I first started the team. Example: MTL. Torrey Mitchell starts as center on the top line (highest row). I drag him to the fourth row (Line). Make a couple trades or some sort of transactions and the software shuffles Mitchell back to the first line. (Top row)

it's probably a small line of code that needs to be expanded on. I think its worth the effort as its pretty annoying and most people use the rows as a guide for their lines their projecting too.


This should no longer be an issue
Feb. 26, 2016 at 12:57 p.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 3
Happened to notice an issue with the Tampa Bay Lightning page. The projected cap space in the coming years does not seen to add up. Also not sure how the buyout dollars are in the salary expenditure area for Lecavalier's buyout as it was a compliance buyout.
Feb. 26, 2016 at 1:32 p.m.
#39
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: Hockeyfan72
Happened to notice an issue with the Tampa Bay Lightning page. The projected cap space in the coming years does not seen to add up. Also not sure how the buyout dollars are in the salary expenditure area for Lecavalier's buyout as it was a compliance buyout.


Compliance buyouts do not have a cap hit, but do indeed still have a salary cost. As is shown on Lecavaliers page: https://www.capfriendly.com/players/vincent_lecavalier

The projected cap space has been fixed, thank you for letting us know about the error!
Jun. 1, 2016 at 8:49 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
So is there a reason why the cap for 16-17 has been set permanently to 71.4M for the AGM? Has it been confirmed?
Jun. 2, 2016 at 12:05 p.m.
#41
Ryan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2015
Posts: 328
Likes: 32
Quoting: F50marco
So is there a reason why the cap for 16-17 has been set permanently to 71.4M for the AGM? Has it been confirmed?


It has not been confirmed yet but this is the latest news on it:


Jun. 2, 2016 at 8:27 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
Quoting: Ryan
Quoting: F50marco
So is there a reason why the cap for 16-17 has been set permanently to 71.4M for the AGM? Has it been confirmed?


It has not been confirmed yet but this is the latest news on it:




Cool, thanks for the heads up.


Next line of business: Has capfreindly scrapped the PP/PK lineups for the AGM? Its not showing up on a lot of posters teams anymore. Is there a way to disable it?
Jun. 3, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.
#43
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: Ryan
Quoting: F50marco
So is there a reason why the cap for 16-17 has been set permanently to 71.4M for the AGM? Has it been confirmed?


It has not been confirmed yet but this is the latest news on it:




Cool, thanks for the heads up.


Next line of business: Has capfreindly scrapped the PP/PK lineups for the AGM? Its not showing up on a lot of posters teams anymore. Is there a way to disable it?


PP/PK lineups have not been removed, but as they were when they were introduced, they are optional: if you do not add any players to the PP/PK, it will not appear on a published team
Jun. 3, 2016 at 11:51 a.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
Quoting: Banks
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: Ryan
Quoting: F50marco
So is there a reason why the cap for 16-17 has been set permanently to 71.4M for the AGM? Has it been confirmed?


It has not been confirmed yet but this is the latest news on it:





Cool, thanks for the heads up.


Next line of business: Has capfreindly scrapped the PP/PK lineups for the AGM? Its not showing up on a lot of posters teams anymore. Is there a way to disable it?


PP/PK lineups have not been removed, but as they were when they were introduced, they are optional: if you do not add any players to the PP/PK, it will not appear on a published team


Oh ok, gotchya. Didn't make the connection.
Jun. 3, 2016 at 11:55 a.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
Oh one more thing, in AGM if a player is signed to a new contract then put on LTIR rookie, then brought back - his salary remains 0$ even on his cap hit. It like keeps the player tile but not his cap hit.
Jun. 3, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
#46
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: F50marco
Oh one more thing, in AGM if a player is signed to a new contract then put on LTIR rookie, then brought back - his salary remains 0$ even on his cap hit. It like keeps the player tile but not his cap hit.


Thanks for the heads up F50marco, very much appreciated

We have an under-the-hood fix coming in the next couple days that will address a couple bugs, this one included smile
Oct. 24, 2016 at 10:21 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,538
Likes: 6,693
Hey guys,

Good job on the expansion draft tool. Not sure if i jumped the gun already but it won't let me publish my team and the team i created wasn't saved. Guessing there isn't an expansion team section created yet?
Oct. 25, 2016 at 1:50 a.m.
#48
Follow CapFriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2015
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 555
Quoting: F50marco
Hey guys,

Good job on the expansion draft tool. Not sure if i jumped the gun already but it won't let me publish my team and the team i created wasn't saved. Guessing there isn't an expansion team section created yet?


Thanks F50marco! Publish expansion teams to forums is coming soon...Stay tuned!
Oct. 26, 2016 at 1:18 p.m.
#49
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 1,914
Quoting: Leafs
Quoting: F50marco
Hey guys,

Good job on the expansion draft tool. Not sure if i jumped the gun already but it won't let me publish my team and the team i created wasn't saved. Guessing there isn't an expansion team section created yet?


Thanks F50marco! Publish expansion teams to forums is coming soon...Stay tuned!

As Leafs said, publish and saving drafts will be coming in a future update smile
Jan. 19, 2017 at 1:52 p.m.
#50
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 2
The Projected Cap Hit for Toronto is $1,206,767 over estimated due to the projected hit being larger than the accumulated hit for Seth Griffith, Peter Holland, and Jhonas Enroth. Substituting these numbers Toronto should project to $70,591,278 rather than $71,798,075. They aren't on the roster, so they should have a future cap hit.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll