SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Creative Cap Crunch amp RHD

Created by: ninetythreein93
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 2, 2019
Published: May 2, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Assuming an $83M cap

One deal and a team friendly, but not too friendly, 1 year deal for Marner to let Marleau stay for one last shot at the cap. I'm not a Sparks fan so I took a chance on a 1 year deal with Mason to see if there is anything left & got a 4th from Columbus assuming Bobrovsky is gone.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,250,000
3$3,250,000
1$8,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. 2020 4th round pick (CBJ)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,000,000$75,164,833$0$132,500$7,835,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$8,500,000$8,500,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 2, 2019 at 12:51 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I like the moves.
1) Only thing I see with Marner taking the one year team friendly and then putting up 100 points and commanding around 12-13
2) I think you can get Manson with Kapanen and a pick, which in my mind is the better move. I believe Nylander is a 80 (maybe even 90) point player with a full camp.
May 2, 2019 at 12:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 551
I doubt Marner would want a 1-year deal as the risk is just too great that he'd have a knee-to-knee and lose value. There's also the lockout to consider and none of these guys want to be without a contract that runs through to the next CBA.

Sorry to rain on your dream of resurrecting Steve Mason's career, but he didn't suit up once anywhere over the past 12 months. He's a happily retired old goalie.
May 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.
#3
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
Ducks decline, they are not trading there only right shot dman, for a overpaid floater.
May 2, 2019 at 1:03 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
93in93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: HabsRafiki
I doubt Marner would want a 1-year deal as the risk is just too great that he'd have a knee-to-knee and lose value. There's also the lockout to consider and none of these guys want to be without a contract that runs through to the next CBA.

Sorry to rain on your dream of resurrecting Steve Mason's career, but he didn't suit up once anywhere over the past 12 months. He's a happily retired old goalie.


The whole idea of this is speculative so of course there are "doubts" but my feeling is Marner wants to stay and the players want Marleau to stay, the Mason thing is irrelevant I just hate Sparks and Mason has never formally retired
May 2, 2019 at 1:08 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
93in93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: brocklesnar
Ducks decline, they are not trading there only right shot dman, for a overpaid floater.


Anaheim finished last in the NHL in goals last year, they would be ecstatic to get Nylander
May 2, 2019 at 1:09 p.m.
#6
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
Quoting: ninetythreein93
Anaheim finished last in the NHL in goals last year, they would be ecstatic to get Nylander


If Anaheim need to find goal scorers they can sign them July 1st, trading Manson away make them worse.
May 2, 2019 at 1:09 p.m.
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: HabsRafiki
I doubt Marner would want a 1-year deal as the risk is just too great that he'd have a knee-to-knee and lose value. There's also the lockout to consider and none of these guys want to be without a contract that runs through to the next CBA.

Sorry to rain on your dream of resurrecting Steve Mason's career, but he didn't suit up once anywhere over the past 12 months. He's a happily retired old goalie.


Certainly the leafs would be able to negotiate a handshake deal to re sign him at TDL. This would negate the risk of getting the injury in the latter part of the season and playoffs. But you are correct. It would still be a risk for marner and maybe a risk for Toronto if he puts up over 100 points. He may want even more.
May 2, 2019 at 1:12 p.m.
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: brocklesnar
If Anaheim need to find goal scorers they can sign them July 1st, trading Manson away make them worse.


Yes because every UFA is going to be lined up around the block to sign up for a team that needs to rebuild.

I still don’t see Anaheim moving Manson. If they did I am sure they would want liljegren in the deal to start the rebuild.
May 2, 2019 at 1:15 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: ninetythreein93
Anaheim finished last in the NHL in goals last year, they would be ecstatic to get Nylander


Quoting: Jamiepo
Yes because every UFA is going to be lined up around the block to sign up for a team that needs to rebuild.

I still don’t see Anaheim moving Manson. If they did I am sure they would want liljegren in the deal to start the rebuild.


Steel, Terry, Comtois, Jones to go along with Rakell, Getz, Silfverberg...they don't need more forwards!
GenXHockey liked this.
May 2, 2019 at 1:15 p.m.
#10
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
Quoting: Jamiepo
Yes because every UFA is going to be lined up around the block to sign up for a team that needs to rebuild.

I still don’t see Anaheim moving Manson. If they did I am sure they would want liljegren in the deal to start the rebuild.


The Ducks still have a strong dcore, great goaltending, and living wise is great. I am sure they will have players interested signing with them.
May 2, 2019 at 1:17 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
93in93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: McMatthews
I like the moves.
1) Only thing I see with Marner taking the one year team friendly and then putting up 100 points and commanding around 12-13
2) I think you can get Manson with Kapanen and a pick, which in my mind is the better move. I believe Nylander is a 80 (maybe even 90) point player with a full camp.


I'd rather have Kapanen, Manson & the pick at $8M than Nylander, Manson at $11M and regardless of Marner putting up 100 I don't believe he gets more than $10.5, at the end of the day he's a winger not a centre
May 2, 2019 at 1:20 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
93in93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: Jamiepo
Yes because every UFA is going to be lined up around the block to sign up for a team that needs to rebuild.

I still don’t see Anaheim moving Manson. If they did I am sure they would want liljegren in the deal to start the rebuild.


I think a 23 year old centre (I think he can play C at the NHL level) with two 60+ point seasons is a pretty good start to a rebuild but I see where you are going.
May 2, 2019 at 1:20 p.m.
#13
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
How can the Ducks take on 7 million cap hit?
They can't.
May 2, 2019 at 1:23 p.m.
#14
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: brocklesnar
The Ducks still have a strong dcore, great goaltending, and living wise is great. I am sure they will have players interested signing with them.


Not the kind they need...

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Steel, Terry, Comtois, Jones to go along with Rakell, Getz, Silfverberg...they don't need more forwards!


Steel terry and jones... if that’s what you want to base a franchise on... Comtois will be good... the other three look like middle 6 guys to me.
May 2, 2019 at 1:25 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Jamiepo
Not the kind they need...



Steel terry and jones... if that’s what you want to base a franchise on... Comtois will be good... the other three look like middle 6 guys to me.


With those kids coming up, the Ducks top end is set for awhile. Well until Getz is done. The others are young enough to take the secondary role when needed.
May 2, 2019 at 1:25 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
93in93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Steel, Terry, Comtois, Jones to go along with Rakell, Getz, Silfverberg...they don't need more forwards!


The first 4 combined for 14 goals in 94 games and nobody on the team hit the 50 point mark
May 2, 2019 at 1:32 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: ninetythreein93
The first 4 combined for 14 goals in 94 games and nobody on the team hit the 50 point mark


I didn't realize a players ceiling was reached at age 21...ANA is not going to contend right now but it won't be long before they are back so why would they trade one of their best D men for another forward? Also, how many points would Nylander have had over 82 games...not 50!
May 2, 2019 at 2:10 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 551
Quoting: Jamiepo
Certainly the leafs would be able to negotiate a handshake deal to re sign him at TDL. This would negate the risk of getting the injury in the latter part of the season and playoffs. But you are correct. It would still be a risk for marner and maybe a risk for Toronto if he puts up over 100 points. He may want even more.


There's no such thing as a "handshake" deal that would protect him. If Marner broke a hip, or his neck, or lost an eye, do you think the Leafs ownership is going to say "it's OK, here's $77M over 7 years"?!! Nope. Besides, the league actually strictly prohibits teams from "pre-negotiating" terms with players, so if an agent cried foul that "we had a deal" and tried to take the Leafs to court, it would be hugely troublesome for the Leafs and the league. There are negotiating windows for a reason.
May 2, 2019 at 3:12 p.m.
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: HabsRafiki
There's no such thing as a "handshake" deal that would protect him. If Marner broke a hip, or his neck, or lost an eye, do you think the Leafs ownership is going to say "it's OK, here's $77M over 7 years"?!! Nope. Besides, the league actually strictly prohibits teams from "pre-negotiating" terms with players, so if an agent cried foul that "we had a deal" and tried to take the Leafs to court, it would be hugely troublesome for the Leafs and the league. There are negotiating windows for a reason.


Okay... try that one more time but read my entire post...
HabsRafiki liked this.
May 2, 2019 at 3:27 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 551
Quoting: Jamiepo
Okay... try that one more time but read my entire post...


No, I'd read it. But the risk is all Marner's. Someone would pay him $11M this summer if he were a UFA. If he has a stellar season, outscores McDavid, he might get $13M. If he has a terrible year or gets hurt, the Leafs might not bother qualifying him and the best offer he might get would be $6M or $7M. If he wants to take a hometown discount, he could sign a solid base contract ($8M) and then load it with bonuses that kick in year 2 and after.
May 2, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.
#21
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: HabsRafiki
No, I'd read it. But the risk is all Marner's. Someone would pay him $11M this summer if he were a UFA. If he has a stellar season, outscores McDavid, he might get $13M. If he has a terrible year or gets hurt, the Leafs might not bother qualifying him and the best offer he might get would be $6M or $7M. If he wants to take a hometown discount, he could sign a solid base contract ($8M) and then load it with bonuses that kick in year 2 and after.


All signing bonuses count toward the cap and it is the average annual value that makes his cap hit.

The handshake deal would to be to re up him on a long term deal at the TDL (this is the earliest the leafs can sign him to another deal after a 1 year deal). There wouldn’t need to be any promises of amounts just a long term deal with marleau’s money.

I for one do not think marner takes that. I think a bridge deal would be a bad idea. Marner needs to be locked in at 6-8 years around the 10m mark. If that is possible.
HabsRafiki liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll