Ranger fan also. I would say the any two of the three for Puljujarvi would be fine. I wouldn't want to retain on Namestikov in case we need to on other deals, but could take back a player like Benning to make the cap hit even out.
I had heard from one Oiler fan that they were not interested in more Defenseman. If that is the case, Vesey and Namestnikov for Puljujarvi would work for me.
Thank you very much for your comments.
I say some separate trades that added up to this. IMO it is a fair trade for both teams, and Poink could be sent to the minors without incurring any cap hit.
Quoting: Bloodykisame
i can see nyr giving up pionk and namestikov no retained for puljarvi.
Quoting: ShattenkirkIsARanger
As a Rangers fan I'd do this tbh
Quoting: WalterT
Ranger fan also. I would say the any two of the three for Puljujarvi would be fine. I wouldn't want to retain on Namestikov in case we need to on other deals, but could take back a player like Benning to make the cap hit even out.
Quoting: nyrcgg22
I would do this.
Quoting: Shakabakes
I had heard from one Oiler fan that they were not interested in more Defenseman. If that is the case, Vesey and Namestnikov for Puljujarvi would work for me.