SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Experimental trades - need comments guys!

Created by: F50marco
Team: 2016-17 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2016
Published: Jun. 13, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$850,000
1$850,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Beaulieu, Nathan
Additional Details:
2016 2nd round pick (45th)
2.
MTL
  1. Wideman, Dennis
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick (6th)
CGY
  1. McNeill, Mark
  2. van Riemsdyk, Trevor
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick (9th)
3.
MTL
  1. Yakupov, Nail
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick (4th)
EDM
  1. Eller, Lars
  2. Fucale, Zachary
  3. Lessio, Lucas
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick (6th)
Buyouts
Buried
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$65,664,042$0$850,000$7,335,958
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 3
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$850,000$850,000
LW
UFA - 2
$2,800,000$2,800,000
C
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
RW
UFA - 1
$612,500$612,500
LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
$6,500,000$6,500,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
$575,000$575,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,982,375$2,982,375
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 13, 2016 at 2:02 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Need to know the reasons these don't make sense if you think they don't guys!
Jun. 13, 2016 at 2:29 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 51
Likes: 4
Why would the habs go for a trade up? 9th pick will be good enough of a player, most likely as good as 4th pick. Beaulieu is cheap and reliable, why would you trade him? Also, I don't believe Yakupov is the type of the player that helps to win a championship.
Jun. 13, 2016 at 2:42 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Quoting: gmguy
Why would the habs go for a trade up? 9th pick will be good enough of a player, most likely as good as 4th pick. Beaulieu is cheap and reliable, why would you trade him? Also, I don't believe Yakupov is the type of the player that helps to win a championship.


Thanks for the criticism.

This is the way i see it. Beaulieu hasn't shown enough for em to believe that he will be what many of us here hope he can be. In that trade, everyone looks at Bickell coming our way and thinks "for Beaulieu" but in reality this is basically Beaulieu and the 2nd for Teravainen, TVR and McNeill. Value judging these players honestly, MTL is stealing from Chi so adding a cap dump that MTL can simply buy out for small 1M cap penalty is totally worth it.

TVR and Beaulieu are basically the same players. The value is pretty much there equally but a 2nd rounder for Teuvo and McNeill is highway robbery.

I agree with you about the 9th pick though. I'm perfectly happy choosing 9th. The trades i mentioned were not so much because i want them to happen. More to see if the value is enough for the other teams to accept it.
Jun. 13, 2016 at 2:54 p.m.
#4
Habs93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
Yakupov is a cheap, one year contract winger, so this trade seems to be ok. The Hawks would be very happy with this Bickell trade, so they will overpay. But I don´t unterstand the Wideman deal. What is your intention for the 2017/18 season? Resign Wideman or free a lot of cap space? And I´am not sure that the 4th over all pick is worth all these trades.
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:08 p.m.
#5
EHOCKEY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Chicago would not do that trade
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:24 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Quoting: marc
Yakupov is a cheap, one year contract winger, so this trade seems to be ok. The Hawks would be very happy with this Bickell trade, so they will overpay. But I don´t unterstand the Wideman deal. What is your intention for the 2017/18 season? Resign Wideman or free a lot of cap space? And I´am not sure that the 4th over all pick is worth all these trades.


Right-o for the Yakupov scenario. I'm gambling that MTL with the Therrien's stern tutelage, Pacioretty's leadership and Galchenyuk's friendship will help put him on the right track. Even if it doesn't work out, have we really lost all that much? If he just becomes a 20G scorer we've already won and that is not a far fetched idea for a guy like Yak. If Kessel can pretty much turn it around, I don't see why Yakuov, who is younger and cheaper can't.

If the Hawks are willing, realistically, Montreal better be all over that.

Regarding Wideman, no chance at resigning him unless its very cap friendly. The idea behind this was to find a way to move up in the draft without giving up much in term of valuable assets. CGY dumps 5.25M in cap space, they get 2 young cheap prospects while moving down only 3 spots and MTL moves up to get the player they probably want the most in Dubois (outside the top 3). They also get a serviceable dman to help limit Markov's minutes. He's only got 1 year left so we're not mortgaging future cap space really. Next year, we spend our extra cap space to target true LH top 4 dmen to play with Subban and Petry (if Markov retires).
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:41 p.m.
#7
Habs93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
F50marco, do you really want to resign Markov?
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:46 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Quoting: marc
F50marco, do you really want to resign Markov?


Depends on the money. Markov has shown this year that age is starting to catch up with him. With that said, he's still pretty good. Just not top pairing with Subban good. sign him next year for 2-3M on a 1 year contract and play him as a 4-6 dman and it would be totally worth it. Even just for the leadership. He's respected in that dressing room.
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:48 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Quoting: EHOCKEY
Chicago would not do that trade


This trade is a total ripoff of a couple other notable Hawks fans proposal and they were ok with it. What makes it seem not a good idea in your mind?
Jun. 13, 2016 at 3:58 p.m.
#10
Habs93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: marc
F50marco, do you really want to resign Markov?


Depends on the money. Markov has shown this year that age is starting to catch up with him. With that said, he's still pretty good. Just not top pairing with Subban good. sign him next year for 2-3M on a 1 year contract and play him as a 4-6 dman and it would be totally worth it. Even just for the leadership. He's respected in that dressing room.


Ok, this seems to be a good contract, but I don´t believe that Markov would accept it.
Jun. 13, 2016 at 4:02 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,595
Likes: 6,735
Quoting: marc
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: marc
F50marco, do you really want to resign Markov?


Depends on the money. Markov has shown this year that age is starting to catch up with him. With that said, he's still pretty good. Just not top pairing with Subban good. sign him next year for 2-3M on a 1 year contract and play him as a 4-6 dman and it would be totally worth it. Even just for the leadership. He's respected in that dressing room.


Ok, this seems to be a good contract, but I don´t believe that Markov would accept it.


I think he's done with contracts and money. He's made his money already. Montreal has been his home for a long time now. He's rooted here. Montreal showed him great respect in signing him long term when he had two very bad knee surgeries and the hockey world doubted if he could come back to 100%, I think for him its either MTL of KHL to live out his hockey days.
Jun. 14, 2016 at 9:31 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 51
Likes: 4
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: marc
Yakupov is a cheap, one year contract winger, so this trade seems to be ok. The Hawks would be very happy with this Bickell trade, so they will overpay. But I don´t unterstand the Wideman deal. What is your intention for the 2017/18 season? Resign Wideman or free a lot of cap space? And I´am not sure that the 4th over all pick is worth all these trades.


Right-o for the Yakupov scenario. I'm gambling that MTL with the Therrien's stern tutelage, Pacioretty's leadership and Galchenyuk's friendship will help put him on the right track. Even if it doesn't work out, have we really lost all that much? If he just becomes a 20G scorer we've already won and that is not a far fetched idea for a guy like Yak. If Kessel can pretty much turn it around, I don't see why Yakuov, who is younger and cheaper can't.

If the Hawks are willing, realistically, Montreal better be all over that.

Regarding Wideman, no chance at resigning him unless its very cap friendly. The idea behind this was to find a way to move up in the draft without giving up much in term of valuable assets. CGY dumps 5.25M in cap space, they get 2 young cheap prospects while moving down only 3 spots and MTL moves up to get the player they probably want the most in Dubois (outside the top 3). They also get a serviceable dman to help limit Markov's minutes. He's only got 1 year left so we're not mortgaging future cap space really. Next year, we spend our extra cap space to target true LH top 4 dmen to play with Subban and Petry (if Markov retires).


Yakupov hasn't proved he can score like Kessel (why did TOR fans wanted him out anyway?), he's a possession anchor and he's kinda got an attitude problem; not so sure anyone can do something about it. IMO, the Habs would be better served by adding a possession-driving player that can play a solid all-around game.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll