SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kevin Hayes and trades

Created by: chitownfan92
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 27, 2019
Published: May 27, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,175,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,750,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Strome, Ryan
  2. 2019 4th round pick (CBJ)
NYR
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Forsling, Gustav [RFA Rights]
  3. 2019 5th round pick (TBL)
2.
CHI
  1. Connauton, Kevin
  2. 2019 3rd round pick (CHI)
  3. 2020 4th round pick (ARI)
3.
CHI
  1. Callahan, Ryan
  2. Raddysh, Taylor
  3. 2019 1st round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Entwistle, Mackenzie
  2. Krys, Chad
  3. Sikura, Dylan [RFA Rights]
  4. 2019 4th round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,000,000$64,138,461$0$5,782,500$18,861,539
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$833,333$833,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,175,000$1,175,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 27, 2019 at 5:44 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
I'm guessing the Saad move is more for freeing up cap space, but I think you can still get a hell of a lot better futures for him.

You have all that cap space? I'd be doing a bit more.
Austerity and ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 5:48 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
If I'm taking on Callahan, Id want a different prospect than Raddysh. I'd even drop the 1st. Cirelli and Miller. Or Sergachev. Also, Jokiharju is a right shot. I don't know why they list him as a left D.
May 27, 2019 at 5:51 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
chitownfan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 10
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I'm guessing the Saad move is more for freeing up cap space, but I think you can still get a hell of a lot better futures for him.

You have all that cap space? I'd be doing a bit more.


Saad is a great two-way player and valuable on the PK but his offensive production has slipped in his second stint in Chicago so I personally don't think his return will be that huge, especially with a $6mil cap hit. Connauton is caught in a numbers game in AZ but can be a cheap stop-gap for Beaudin (and possibly) Byram if the Hawks draft him. He blocks shots, throws his weight around, and good in his own end.

Also, I freed up alot of cap space to make sure the front office can sign DeBrincat, Strome, Gustafsson, etc. after this year, so no point to sign a bunch of FA's to long term deals.
May 27, 2019 at 5:52 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I'm guessing the Saad move is more for freeing up cap space, but I think you can still get a hell of a lot better futures for him.

You have all that cap space? I'd be doing a bit more.


I agree. Caggiula is a good depth player. But he's not a 1LW. 10.5m in space with Callahan and Crawford expiring leaving plenty of room to sign Debrincat and Strome.
ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 5:54 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: chitownfan92
Saad is a great two-way player and valuable on the PK but his offensive production has slipped in his second stint in Chicago so I personally don't think his return will be that huge, especially with a $6mil cap hit. Connauton is caught in a numbers game in AZ but can be a cheap stop-gap for Beaudin (and possibly) Byram if the Hawks draft him. He blocks shots, throws his weight around, and good in his own end.

Also, I freed up alot of cap space to make sure the front office can sign DeBrincat, Strome, Gustafsson, etc. after this year, so no point to sign a bunch of FA's to long term deals.


Saads career high in points was 53. He "slipped" to 47 this past year. I'd pass on resigning Gustafson. His defense has gotten better. But he has a ton of trade value to other teams that lose out on Karlsson. Another offensive defenseman from Sweden who's Defense is suspect.
ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 5:55 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
chitownfan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 10
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
I agree. Caggiula is a good depth player. But he's not a 1LW. 10.5m in space with Callahan and Crawford expiring leaving plenty of room to sign Debrincat and Strome.


Caggiula had chemistry with Toews and Kane, sometimes you don't need a true 1LW to play that position..We don't need to sign Dzingel or Skinner just because they are labeled as 1LW, look back a few years ago when Carcillo was playing with Toews and Kane and their line was clicking.
May 27, 2019 at 5:58 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
chitownfan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 10
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
Saads career high in points was 53. He "slipped" to 47 this past year. I'd pass on resigning Gustafson. His defense has gotten better. But he has a ton of trade value to other teams that lose out on Karlsson. Another offensive defenseman from Sweden who's Defense is suspect.


He had three straight 50 point seasons and then came back and put up 35 points 2 years ago and 47 last year...so yes, his offensive production has slipped since rejoining us...
May 27, 2019 at 6:08 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: chitownfan92
Caggiula had chemistry with Toews and Kane, sometimes you don't need a true 1LW to play that position..We don't need to sign Dzingel or Skinner just because they are labeled as 1LW, look back a few years ago when Carcillo was playing with Toews and Kane and their line was clicking.


Caggiula is first line fools gold. He's played on lines with Kane and Toews and in Edmonton McDavid and Draisatl. 2/3 of those 2 lines were producing a ppg per player. The 3rd player is less than half that point production wise. I know it's naive to only use points, but he didn't drive possession either.
ChiHawk and Austerity liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 6:12 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: chitownfan92
He had three straight 50 point seasons and then came back and put up 35 points 2 years ago and 47 last year...so yes, his offensive production has slipped since rejoining us...


Remove one bad year and his career average is 51 points in an 82 game year. 47 is less than 51 obviously. But it's not a precipitous fall from grace. I won't be upset if he is traded. Just don't think Taylor Raddysh or Ryan Strome are the answers to replacing him.
ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 6:24 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
chitownfan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 10
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
Remove one bad year and his career average is 51 points in an 82 game year. 47 is less than 51 obviously. But it's not a precipitous fall from grace. I won't be upset if he is traded. Just don't think Taylor Raddysh or Ryan Strome are the answers to replacing him.


I'm just playing it safe with one-year replacements because there are so many ways they can attack next off-season with all the UFA's. Do they trade Gus? Do they let Crow walk? Does DeBrincat somehow play better than this past year and plays himself to a $8-9 mil cap hit? Does Strome take a step-forward and demand $6mil+? Too many what if's so once they get a clear idea of what to do after next year, then they can hand out big contracts to FA's. Saad and AA will get traded either this year or next, its inevitable.
Austerity liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 7:07 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,295
Likes: 9,751
Quoting: chitownfan92
I'm just playing it safe with one-year replacements because there are so many ways they can attack next off-season with all the UFA's. Do they trade Gus? Do they let Crow walk? Does DeBrincat somehow play better than this past year and plays himself to a $8-9 mil cap hit? Does Strome take a step-forward and demand $6mil+? Too many what if's so once they get a clear idea of what to do after next year, then they can hand out big contracts to FA's. Saad and AA will get traded either this year or next, its inevitable.


AA yes, but Saad until they can find a guy to replace Saad then no. For anyone to measure Saad based on points doesn't understand Saad or the importance of defensive forwards....his game isn't to be a dynamic winger yet most fans only read points when it comes to forwards and judge players on points versus cap hit...that is the wrong logic when measuring 200 ft players.
May 27, 2019 at 7:29 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
chitownfan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 10
Quoting: ChiHawk
AA yes, but Saad until they can find a guy to replace Saad then no. For anyone to measure Saad based on points doesn't understand Saad or the importance of defensive forwards....his game isn't to be a dynamic winger yet most fans only read points when it comes to forwards and judge players on points versus cap hit...that is the wrong logic when measuring 200 ft players.


Did you not read my previous comments about Saad?

"Saad is a great two-way player and valuable on the PK but his offensive production has slipped in his second stint in Chicago so I personally don't think his return will be that huge, especially with a $6mil cap hit."

Plus you made yourself look like a hypocrite liking posts about having too much cap space when you just posted a team with Hayes with more cap room than me. Also, you traded Saad for 2 2nd rounders (one of those in the high 20's mind you) and I traded him for a decent LHD stop-gap and a high 3rd and a high 4th. Seems a little fishy there my dude.
May 27, 2019 at 8:54 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: chitownfan92
Did you not read my previous comments about Saad?

"Saad is a great two-way player and valuable on the PK but his offensive production has slipped in his second stint in Chicago so I personally don't think his return will be that huge, especially with a $6mil cap hit."

Plus you made yourself look like a hypocrite liking posts about having too much cap space when you just posted a team with Hayes with more cap room than me. Also, you traded Saad for 2 2nd rounders (one of those in the high 20's mind you) and I traded him for a decent LHD stop-gap and a high 3rd and a high 4th. Seems a little fishy there my dude.


Decent? Connaughton is replacement level at best. I'm ok with trading Saad, but I think you need a plan to replace what he brings.
ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2019 at 11:08 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,295
Likes: 9,751
Quoting: chitownfan92
Did you not read my previous comments about Saad?

"Saad is a great two-way player and valuable on the PK but his offensive production has slipped in his second stint in Chicago so I personally don't think his return will be that huge, especially with a $6mil cap hit."

Plus you made yourself look like a hypocrite liking posts about having too much cap space when you just posted a team with Hayes with more cap room than me. Also, you traded Saad for 2 2nd rounders (one of those in the high 20's mind you) and I traded him for a decent LHD stop-gap and a high 3rd and a high 4th. Seems a little fishy there my dude.


Are you upset?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll