SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

perry for oko

Created by: jonnymc26
Team: 2019-20 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 10, 2019
Published: Jun. 10, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
half the term and points of oko. bufff will need cap space sooner than ana at current rate of spending
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
4$3,000,000
4$3,000,000
3$1,000,000
Trades
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the BUF
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,000,000$64,497,500$0$7,282,500$18,502,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,650,000$3,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,387,500$3,387,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$812,500$812,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 10, 2019 at 9:16 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 229
LOL. The Ducks aren’t taking the longer contract AND giving up a good prospect.
Jun. 10, 2019 at 9:34 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,622
Likes: 14,414
Wow, one of the worst trades I've ever seen on here. Anaheim dies of laughter
Jun. 10, 2019 at 11:46 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
LOL. The Ducks aren’t taking the longer contract AND giving up a good prospect.
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Wow, one of the worst trades I've ever seen on here. Anaheim dies of laughter


your not a prospect at 22. buffalo gives up 47 points to ana s loss of 15 points and saves them over 2m$. so you dont know what your talking about. if ana is thinking of buying out perry witch is all over the news, it will cost them about 4.1m$ for next 4 years regardless. at least with this trade they get some players for that wasted cap space.
Jun. 11, 2019 at 2:16 a.m.
#4
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
your not a prospect at 22. buffalo gives up 47 points to ana s loss of 15 points and saves them over 2m$. so you dont know what your talking about. if ana is thinking of buying out perry witch is all over the news, it will cost them about 4.1m$ for next 4 years regardless. at least with this trade they get some players for that wasted cap space.


This is bad. The ducks want the roster spot not that cap room. They aren’t in cap trouble. Also Perry has 49 points 2 seasons ago when he played the full season. Okposo hasn’t hit 49 points since he joined BUF. He also has his own injury concerns. If there’s any player/pick with value going anywhere in this deal it’s going to the ducks.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 6:15 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
This is bad. The ducks want the roster spot not that cap room. They aren’t in cap trouble. Also Perry has 49 points 2 seasons ago when he played the full season. Okposo hasn’t hit 49 points since he joined BUF. He also has his own injury concerns. If there’s any player/pick with value going anywhere in this deal it’s going to the ducks.


i dont think thats true at all about roster spots. if they needed that they could just put perry in AHL and you would be good. brass in duck land do not want perry on team period, to the point they talk about buyouts. even as small a gain as it is this could very well be better then what ducks actually get back for him.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 7:44 p.m.
#6
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
i dont think thats true at all about roster spots. if they needed that they could just put perry in AHL and you would be good. brass in duck land do not want perry on team period, to the point they talk about buyouts. even as small a gain as it is this could very well be better then what ducks actually get back for him.


He has a NMC that means he can not be put on waivers. He can’t go to the minors.

Okposo has a contract twice as long as Perry’s and Zemgus has to be signed so in all the ducks clog the roster more and don’t get any cap relief but get put on the hook for 6M for 2 extra years.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 9:54 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
He has a NMC that means he can not be put on waivers. He can’t go to the minors.

Okposo has a contract twice as long as Perry’s and Zemgus has to be signed so in all the ducks clog the roster more and don’t get any cap relief but get put on the hook for 6M for 2 extra years.


i still dont see the need to bring up players ducks arnt a deep team on forwards and can surly just drop a bottom 6 guy like GRANT, ROWNEY or SHORE
Jun. 13, 2019 at 10:18 p.m.
#8
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
i still dont see the need to bring up players ducks arnt a deep team on forwards and can surly just drop a bottom 6 guy like GRANT, ROWNEY or SHORE


So make a bad trade and just dump guys for the hell of it?
Jun. 13, 2019 at 11:21 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
So make a bad trade and just dump guys for the hell of it?


umm to hugely upgrade your bottom six
Jun. 13, 2019 at 11:43 p.m.
#10
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
umm to hugely upgrade your bottom six


Lol that’s a downgrade bud.
Jun. 14, 2019 at 6:03 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol that’s a downgrade bud.


prove it. i gave you stats and explantion and didnt work on you, you've tried denying things but offer up no proof that its not improvement. so prove it with some stats or give up on the fact that oko and gerg arnt better than 2 of your bottom 6.
Jun. 14, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.
#12
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
prove it. i gave you stats and explantion and didnt work on you, you've tried denying things but offer up no proof that its not improvement. so prove it with some stats or give up on the fact that oko and gerg arnt better than 2 of your bottom 6.


The ducks have Rakell, Comtois, Jones, Ritchie and Shore on the left side and Silfverberg, Terry, Kase, Sprong on the right. Which guys are they better than?
Jun. 15, 2019 at 1:55 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
The ducks have Rakell, Comtois, Jones, Ritchie and Shore on the left side and Silfverberg, Terry, Kase, Sprong on the right. Which guys are they better than?


according to corsia SHORE, GRANT,ROWNEY and pretty even with RITCHIE witch surprised me. sprong and perry were slightly higher but noting that would jump off page.
Jun. 15, 2019 at 4:47 p.m.
#14
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
according to corsia SHORE, GRANT,ROWNEY and pretty even with RITCHIE witch surprised me. sprong and perry were slightly higher but noting that would jump off page.


So not taking on 2 extra years of 6M just to slightly increase the 4th line.
Jun. 15, 2019 at 5:54 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
So not taking on 2 extra years of 6M just to slightly increase the 4th line.


its 2m$ extra for a 20 point increase on production compaired to a buyout. i still think you miss the point that this is all about being better then a buyout scenario not a whos better trade.
Jun. 15, 2019 at 6:02 p.m.
#16
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
its 2m$ extra for a 20 point increase on production compaired to a buyout. i still think you miss the point that this is all about being better then a buyout scenario not a whos better trade.


You missed the point. There’s no reason to take on 2 extra years at 6M for a player worse than the one they want to buy out.
Jun. 16, 2019 at 8:33 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
You missed the point. There’s no reason to take on 2 extra years at 6M for a player worse than the one they want to buy out.


take the buy out see how that works out for yea with that weak system of players you have coming up. dont forget to pull an Edmonton and bring them up to early and ruin there confidence while you are at it.
Jun. 16, 2019 at 10:31 p.m.
#18
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: jonnymc26
take the buy out see how that works out for yea with that weak system of players you have coming up. dont forget to pull an Edmonton and bring them up to early and ruin there confidence while you are at it.


Lol you mad BUF is ****?
Jun. 17, 2019 at 5:19 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 172
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol you mad BUF is ****?


who wouldnt be. but at least they are on up swing unlike some other teams
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll