SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

what would the Wild give for Marner

Created by: Trickster
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2019
Published: Jun. 12, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
@tansor @mnbassman

What do you think?
More? Less?

Only looking for input on this trade.
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,000,000$80,263,865$0$500,000$2,736,135
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$916,666$916,666 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,187,500$5,187,500
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:40 p.m.
#1
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:42 p.m.
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
If I were Wild I'd take that trade any day.
MNBassman, Trickster and TanSor liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:45 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,490
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: BurgerBoss
If I were Wild I'd take that trade any day.


Agreed, i know that the Thread is going toward MIN fan base, but anything than 4 x 1st is no-go from my side : https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/229172
Trickster liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:48 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
Quoting: BurgerBoss
If I were Wild I'd take that trade any day.


Do you think they should add more?
Maybe just a pick??
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:49 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:53 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
Quoting: BurgerBoss
If I were Wild I'd take that trade any day.


Or how about Wild retain on Spurgeon??
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:57 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 2,619
I feel Minny needs to add a pick to the deal. Perhaps 2nd rounder.

Quoting: Laudan
Agreed, i know that the Thread is going toward MIN fan base, but anything than 4 x 1st is no-go from my side : https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/229172


The thing is that I don't see any team offer-sheeting Marner. Yeah there's alot of talk of it but historically it just doesn't happen.
That said, if the Leafs can't agree with Marner's camp on a deal, then trading him makes sense.
Trickster liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 9:59 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
The value isn't bad, but the players might not be the right choice. Any Marner trade starts with Dumba over Spurgeon. Age difference and contract status are the 2 big factors there. Then a young, up and coming roster player, Greenway fits that description but I'd aim for Luke Kunin. Only 21 and a well needed right handed centre, that might be the thing Toronto needs most actually. Then multiple picks involved and perhaps another prospects. Toronto has to add a bit as well, but those should be the main pieces coming back. I doubt if Minnesota would "want to give" that for Marner, but it seems to be pretty good value for him.

I've suggested this in the past:

Minnesota Wild
Mitch Marner
Callé Rosén
Toronto 2020 3rd round pick

Toronto Maple Leafs
Matt Dumba
Luke Kunin
Conor Dewar
Minnesota 2020 1st round pick (top 5 protected)
Minnesota 2021 5th round pick
blowing_the_zone and TH13 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:00 p.m.
#9
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 3,571
I have to think about this one for a day or two...
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:06 p.m.
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Trickster
Do you think they should add more?
Maybe just a pick??


Quoting: Trickster
Or how about Wild retain on Spurgeon??


Honestly moving a young TOP10, possibly even TOP5 RW on this league for a pending UFA D, TOP6 winger and winger prospect with TOP6 potential as a base of the trade doesn't work long term.
TOR isn't saving any money after this move, and there's a potential risk that they'd lose Spurgeon after the year (I wouldn't be surprised to see him getting a 7x7 deal as UFA which TOR can't really afford).

The problem is that any trade that has the incentive for Dubas involving Marner includes assets from MIN that they'd never be in the position to give up.

If some godly being forces TOR to trade Marner to MIN, I'd say the move should be something like this:

Toronto Maple Leafs
Matt Dumba
Jordan Greenway
Kevin Fiala
2019 1st round pick
2020 2nd round pick

Minnesota Wild
Mitch Marner
Nikita Zaitsev

And I think Wild would decline. Wild is not going to pay as much as TOR would like. And that is the biggest issue when you're dealing with the absolute top assets of the league. For top assets you naturally want top assets or close to that in exchange, until the cost gets too high from anyone to benefit from the deal. Moving several close to top assets for one top asset would create more problems than it would solve.

And that is the biggest issue.
blowing_the_zone liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:07 p.m.
#11
Jangle29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 830


I think its terrible. A trade has to be based around a younger core guy coming back if Marner leaves
palhal liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:08 p.m.
#12
In Pridham we trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1,969
I agree with Ryminister. I really like Spurgeon, but if Minny wants Marner the talks start with Dumba, or it's not happening.
Ryminister_27 and TH13 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:09 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,490
Likes: 1,559
Edited Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:17 p.m.
Quoting: oneX
The thing is that I don't see any team offer-sheeting Marner. Yeah there's alot of talk of it but historically it just doesn't happen.
That said, if the Leafs can't agree with Marner's camp on a deal, then trading him makes sense.


Problem is that only asset from that trade TML needs in Spurgeon and his rental can be fetched for far less than losing Marner
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:21 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 2,619
Quoting: Laudan
Problem is that only asset form that trade TML needs in Spurgeon and his rental can be fetched for far less than losing Marner


I understand your point about Spurgeon and I hope you understand mine about the 4 first round picks..in that they are a unrealistic scenario.
As others here have suggested, Dumba would be a more reasonable asset going the other way if Marner is involved in said trade.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:23 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Honestly moving a young TOP10, possibly even TOP5 RW on this league for a pending UFA D, TOP6 winger and winger prospect with TOP6 potential as a base of the trade doesn't work long term.
TOR isn't saving any money after this move, and there's a potential risk that they'd lose Spurgeon after the year (I wouldn't be surprised to see him getting a 7x7 deal as UFA which TOR can't really afford).

The problem is that any trade that has the incentive for Dubas involving Marner includes assets from MIN that they'd never be in the position to give up.

If some godly being forces TOR to trade Marner to MIN, I'd say the move should be something like this:

Toronto Maple Leafs
Matt Dumba
Jordan Greenway
Kevin Fiala
2019 1st round pick
2020 2nd round pick

Minnesota Wild
Mitch Marner
Nikita Zaitsev

And I think Wild would decline. Wild is not going to pay as much as TOR would like. And that is the biggest issue when you're dealing with the absolute top assets of the league. For top assets you naturally want top assets or close to that in exchange, until the cost gets too high from anyone to benefit from the deal. Moving several close to top assets for one top asset would create more problems than it would solve.

And that is the biggest issue.


What about

Dumba
Fiala
Kunin
2nd or 3rd rounder

For

Marner
Hollowell
1st rounder
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:24 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,490
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: oneX
I understand your point about Spurgeon and I hope you understand mine about the 4 first round picks..in that they are a unrealistic scenario.
As others here have suggested, Dumba would be a more reasonable asset going the other way if Marner is involved in said trade.


Makes sense, but if you check MIN fan threads, they are for Kapanen, which would cost them 6M less ( cca ) and they would keep Dumba as they are building on him.

Marner can only wait for fictional offer-sheets, as soon as trade is in question, Dubas has an upper hand on the kid and force him closer to his own terms. Tho after he caved on Matthews, i doubt he will have the balls for such scenario....
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:37 p.m.
#17
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Trickster
What about

Dumba
Fiala
Kunin
2nd or 3rd rounder

For

Marner
Hollowell
1st rounder


Value wise Wild is the clear winner.

But are they in the position to move Dumba? Would the move create bigger holes than it would solve?

Probably. But I'd take it if I were Wild.
MNBassman and Trickster liked this.
Jun. 12, 2019 at 10:47 p.m.
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,433
Likes: 22,637


It's one year of Spurgeon that is kinda useless to the Leafs. With/without Marner Leafs are going to be worse than last year with Gardiner/Hainsey and the injured Dermot and Hyman. Leafs still have to get rid of cap. If it's Nylander OK, Kadri/Brown OK. Even Marner gone that's OK, but the return should be long term ELCs or even the four first rounders via offer sheet.
GenXHockey liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 2:05 a.m.
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700


Sorry but zucker is not the type of winger we need. He’s a net presence guy. A lot of teams coould Use this but not the leafs. Certainly not if were were giving up marner. That void needs a playmaker.

Love spurgeon and greenway but when it comes down to it greenway May be the best piece from the wild’s side.

I think it would be much more beneficial for the leafs to target spurgeon with kappy.

@TanSor @MNBassman

How about...

Toronto Maple Leafs
Kadri
Kapanen
2020 1st

Minnesota Wild
Spurgeon
Ericsson Ek
Greenway
TanSor and oneX liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 10:03 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
It is a lot of value but I think any Marner trade will have to include Dumba to the Leafs
Trickster and oneX liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 10:04 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: Jamiepo
Sorry but zucker is not the type of winger we need. He’s a net presence guy. A lot of teams coould Use this but not the leafs. Certainly not if were were giving up marner. That void needs a playmaker.

Love spurgeon and greenway but when it comes down to it greenway May be the best piece from the wild’s side.

I think it would be much more beneficial for the leafs to target spurgeon with kappy.

@TanSor @MNBassman

How about...

Toronto Maple Leafs
Kadri
Kapanen
2020 1st

Minnesota Wild
Spurgeon
Ericsson Ek
Greenway


It isn't bad value-wise, but Kadri really isn't a great target for us. If we trade for a center it has to be a young one with potential to be a 1C. Kadri is what he is at this point which is a good 2C on a contender but not really an ideal 1C
GenXHockey and MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 12:37 p.m.
#22
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: Jamiepo
Sorry but zucker is not the type of winger we need. He’s a net presence guy. A lot of teams coould Use this but not the leafs. Certainly not if were were giving up marner. That void needs a playmaker.

Love spurgeon and greenway but when it comes down to it greenway May be the best piece from the wild’s side.

I think it would be much more beneficial for the leafs to target spurgeon with kappy.

@TanSor @MNBassman

How about...

Toronto Maple Leafs
Kadri
Kapanen
2020 1st

Minnesota Wild
Spurgeon
Ericsson Ek
Greenway


I’m with @TanSor here - no interest in Kadri at all.
And for the record, Zucker is not a net front presence guy...not even close. He’s a great skater...and a very inaccurate shooter, although he has a good release and a lot of zip on his shot. He is feisty though!
Trickster and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 12:39 p.m.
#23
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 3,571
I would give some thought to Kapanen, Zaitsev, and the 2020 1st for Spurgeon and retain 1/2 his salary for next year.

How’s that sound?
oneX liked this.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 1:43 p.m.
#24
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: MNBassman
I would give some thought to Kapanen, Zaitsev, and the 2020 1st for Spurgeon and retain 1/2 his salary for next year.

How’s that sound?


Too much to give up on a rental I would say. I know you want a good return on spurgeon but I can’t really justify giving up kappy and 1st, zaitsev is meh, he requested a trade and with that contract we wouldn’t get more than a 4th. Giving up kappy and a 1st I would be looking for a Dman with more control. Probably wouldn’t be as good as spurgeon but he will be getting a raise next year and turning 30 so re signing him may not be in our best interest.

With kappy zaitsev and Marleau gone probably wouldn’t need anything retained.
Jun. 13, 2019 at 1:49 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,490
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: MNBassman
I would give some thought to Kapanen, Zaitsev, and the 2020 1st for Spurgeon and retain 1/2 his salary for next year.

How’s that sound?


Would that work for you ?

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/235537
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll