Erik Brannstrom is considered one of the best defensive prospects currently, and the centerpiece of the stone trade, he's not going anywhere.

You don't want turris

Nah

Dobson > Brannstrom. Isles would never trade him

I agree that Dobson has more value which is why a B level prospect and a 5th I found made the difference but brannstrom Is a great prospect who could end up being more dynamic his ceiling is higher just more risk

Nobody has freaked out of we the Pulock Trade so on behalf of the leafs I would like to accept.

Dobson really better than Brannstrom??? I don't think so...
Dobson played in Quebec junior, with younger players, with a poor team average of 0.5 pt/game, with the best team 1.25 pts/game. In the memorial cup 3 pts in 5 games.
Brannstrom played with adult in the AHL, 0.75 pt/game.
For exemple: Josh Brook in a stronger canadian junior league than Dobson is 1.25 pts/game with a average team...
In my mind Brannstrom >>> Brook > Dobson

Dobson for Brannstrom is intriguing considering the Isles also have Bode Wilde doing fantastic in Junior play. With Dobson and Wilde, the Isles have two Right shots, with room enough for only one of them. If the Isles lose one of Dobson/Wilde for Brannstrom, they'd have room for both Brannstrom and Dobson/Wilde. Personally, I'd rather move Wilde+++ for Brannstrom than move Dobson, but that's me. Maybe Durandeau, Bellows and Wilde for Brannstrom? Just a thought.

Isles aren't moving Pulock. Johnsson had a good year, but Pulock is a huge part of the team's future. While I'd find the value on the TOR trade too low in value for the Isles, I'd say the Isles turn it down because he's just not for sale, not really because the value isn't there.

I'm not a fan of Turris, too inconsistent and he'll be 30 very soon. Though a lot of Isles fans disagree with me, so I can't say it's a BAD idea, just one I disagree with.

No, Noah Dobson is less risky and has higher celing