SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kulikov rumours, Yandle, Okposo

Created by: canes2006
Team: 2016-17 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 19, 2016
Published: Jun. 19, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
5$4,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
6$6,000,000
4$4,200,000
2$925,000
Vesey, Jimmy
3$925,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Kinkaid, Keith
Additional Details:
2017 2nd round pick
NJD
  1. Chara, Zdeno ($916,667 retained)
  2. Hayes, Jimmy
2.
BOS
    2016 6th round pick
    VAN
    1. Seidenberg, Dennis ($1,000,000 retained)
    3.
    BOS
    1. Kulikov, Dmitry
    Additional Details:
    2018 3rd round pick (if Kulikov doesn't sign)
    2018 5th round pick (if Kulikov doesn't sign)
    FLA
    1. Arnesson, Linus
    2. Hickman, Justin
    3. Subban, Malcolm
    Additional Details:
    2016 1st round pick (BOS)
    2017 4th round pick
    Retained Salary Transactions
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$74,400,000$68,760,000$0$165,000$5,640,000
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 7
    $1,900,000$1,900,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    $7,250,000$7,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    $925,000$925,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Vesey, Jimmy
    $925,000$925,000
    $950,000$950,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    $4,200,000$4,200,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    $792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 7
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    $4,333,333$4,333,333
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 4
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 3
    $725,000$725,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 12:08 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2015
    Posts: 49
    Likes: 2
    right side of the d looks horrible!
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 12:08 p.m.
    #2
    BruinsArsenal
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 49
    Likes: 7
    Okposo will go to Minnesota. Yandle is possible but last resort I think for the B's, we want a more defensive guy. Plus Krug will be resigned for cheaper and does the same job. Vesey is 50/50 at this point but I'd be more inclined to say he will go to Buffalo. Chara isn't going anywhere he will retire a Bruin at the end of his contract if he continues to slide. Kulikov is borderline top 4. On a good team he should be a 5-6. Way too much to give. Kevan Miller top 2? Awful. Sorry this is a terrible team with pretty bad moves.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 12:19 p.m.
    #3
    BreKel
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 3,537
    Likes: 460
    Quoting: ceil
    right side of the d looks horrible!


    Don't you mean the whole thing?

    And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 12:44 p.m.
    #4
    BruinsArsenal
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 49
    Likes: 7
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: ceil
    right side of the d looks horrible!


    Don't you mean the whole thing?

    And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.


    Tell that to the advanced analytics guys.
    Kulikov compared to Torey Krug. http://public.tableau.com/shared/CFG78Z9N8?:display_count=yes
    Just because he plays Top 4 minutes doesn't mean he's good at it.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 12:49 p.m.
    #5
    BreKel
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 3,537
    Likes: 460
    Quoting: Klew
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: ceil
    right side of the d looks horrible!


    Don't you mean the whole thing?

    And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.


    Tell that to the advanced analytics guys.
    Kulikov compared to Torey Krug. http://public.tableau.com/shared/CFG78Z9N8?:display_count=yes
    Just because he plays Top 4 minutes doesn't mean he's good at it.


    Sorry, but "advanced analytics," don't do it for me. The eye test is 10x better. Kevan Miller had better advanced stats than Kulkov, and yet...I would take Kulikov 10x10. If advanced stats are your go-to, please refrain from debating.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 1:32 p.m.
    #6
    BruinsArsenal
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 49
    Likes: 7
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: Klew
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: ceil
    right side of the d looks horrible!


    Don't you mean the whole thing?

    And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.


    Tell that to the advanced analytics guys.
    Kulikov compared to Torey Krug. http://public.tableau.com/shared/CFG78Z9N8?:display_count=yes
    Just because he plays Top 4 minutes doesn't mean he's good at it.


    Sorry, but "advanced analytics," don't do it for me. The eye test is 10x better. Kevan Miller had better advanced stats than Kulkov, and yet...I would take Kulikov 10x10. If advanced stats are your go-to, please refrain from debating.


    They are not my go-to.. In fact I used to hate them. I agree eye test is a good indicator of quality. However these stats also do paint a picture and NHL teams do use them when deciding for and against getting a player. So they do have use. I like to use both nowadays. I agree Kulikov is better than Miller but that's not hard at all. I just wouldn't give up those assets for him.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 3:36 p.m.
    #7
    BreKel
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 3,537
    Likes: 460
    Quoting: Klew
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: Klew
    Quoting: BreKel
    Quoting: ceil
    right side of the d looks horrible!


    Don't you mean the whole thing?

    And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.


    Tell that to the advanced analytics guys.
    Kulikov compared to Torey Krug. http://public.tableau.com/shared/CFG78Z9N8?:display_count=yes
    Just because he plays Top 4 minutes doesn't mean he's good at it.


    Sorry, but "advanced analytics," don't do it for me. The eye test is 10x better. Kevan Miller had better advanced stats than Kulkov, and yet...I would take Kulikov 10x10. If advanced stats are your go-to, please refrain from debating.


    They are not my go-to.. In fact I used to hate them. I agree eye test is a good indicator of quality. However these stats also do paint a picture and NHL teams do use them when deciding for and against getting a player. So they do have use. I like to use both nowadays. I agree Kulikov is better than Miller but that's not hard at all. I just wouldn't give up those assets for him.


    Oh, I wouldn't touch that offer as well. The 14th overall, alone, is too much for the UFA, Kulikov. I like him as a player, think he's a top 4 defenseman (even on a good team -- which is where we differ), but Subban + 14th doesn't do it for me. Would rather draft Fabbro, McAvoy, Bean or hell see if Chychrun/Sergachev/Juolevi drop -- LONG SHOT -- and let them develop. All have top 4 potential and you'll have them under control on 3 year ELC's.
    Jun. 19, 2016 at 7:37 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 237
    Likes: 5
    Edited Nov. 21, 2016 at 12:59 a.m.
    The Right side of the D is BAD
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll