SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this rumor real lol

Created by: badhombre
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 19, 2019
Published: Jun. 19, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don’t know how I feel about Pavelski possibly signing with Chicago lol
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$8,000,000
1$2,500,000
5$5,500,000
Trades
CHI
  1. 2019 2nd round pick (CGY)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,000,000$70,413,353$0$3,782,500$12,586,647
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 3
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:05 a.m.
#1
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Anisimov for a second rounder is max lulz. Sorry, not a chance.

I personally would be ****ing thrilled to have Pavelski in the Indian Head, he's long been a favorite of mine. Would be an outstanding FA signing.

Well, not at that price, but yeah...
badhombre and PhillDaThrill liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:08 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: JackBurton
Anisimov for a second rounder is max lulz. Sorry, not a chance.

I personally would be ****ing thrilled to have Pavelski in the Indian Head, he's long been a favorite of mine. Would be an outstanding FA signing.

Well, not at that price, but yeah...


based on the Hayes signing today, and skinner signing last week, free agents are gonna be silly expensive. at least its only 2 years.
badhombre and JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:09 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
You’re right I can see a third rounder being more appropriate for Anisimov and I thought 2 years @ $8 million is good for Pavelski who is turning 35 next month last thing Chicago needs is a Marleau on their team
JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:10 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: JackBurton
Anisimov for a second rounder is max lulz. Sorry, not a chance.

I personally would be ****ing thrilled to have Pavelski in the Indian Head, he's long been a favorite of mine. Would be an outstanding FA signing.

Well, not at that price, but yeah...


If Hayes is making 7, Pavelski is a steal at 8mil. Dude scored nearly 40 goals last year, and hasn't dipped below 60 points in a full season in like a decade. He's worth at least 8, maybe more if he's only getting two years.
JackBurton and bunnymcfoo liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:10 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 96
Quoting: JackBurton
Anisimov for a second rounder is max lulz. Sorry, not a chance.

I personally would be ****ing thrilled to have Pavelski in the Indian Head, he's long been a favorite of mine. Would be an outstanding FA signing.

Well, not at that price, but yeah...


Perhaps thinking Garth Snow is still the GM?
stoker and JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:12 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
Quoting: mhockey91
based on the Hayes signing today, and skinner signing last week, free agents are gonna be silly expensive. at least its only 2 years.


Inflation in contracts has definitely become a trend I can’t fathom how Hayes has a better deal than Pastrnak I wonder if players are doing this on purpose so the league is forced to raise the salary cap exponentially which would work out in the players favor
mhockey91 and JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:13 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 71
Pavs is smart. He is going to want this contract to be long enough to be his final contract. That's why I say its 3 years. He would be willing to take a 7mil AAV if it ensures him that 3rd year.
mhockey91 and JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:15 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: badhombre
Inflation in contracts has definitely become a trend I can’t fathom how Hayes has a better deal than Pastrnak I wonder if players are doing this on purpose so the league is forced to raise the salary cap exponentially which would work out in the players favor


I'm gearing up towards a future lockout. the league cant sustain with guys like Hayes making more than Pasta like you said. Imagine in the next CBA the league adds an "opt out" option similar to the NBA. would be insane. it won't happen obviously but that would be a fun thought.
MisstheWhalers and CFMan liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:15 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
Quoting: PhillDaThrill
Pavs is smart. He is going to want this contract to be long enough to be his final contract. That's why I say its 3 years. He would be willing to take a 7mil AAV if it ensures him that 3rd year.


3 years $21 million for Pavelski AAV $7 million is a steal for Pavelski I can’t imagine San Jose being against resigning him for that deal
JackBurton and bunnymcfoo liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:18 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 240
Likes: 35
If we do end up signing Pavelski, I’d preferably sign him for one year, doubt he would want that though. But that would ideal since then we would have plenty of money to sign DeBrincat and Strome next year.
JackBurton liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:19 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
Quoting: mhockey91
I'm gearing up towards a future lockout. the league cant sustain with guys like Hayes making more than Pasta like you said. Imagine in the next CBA the league adds an "opt out" option similar to the NBA. would be insane. it won't happen obviously but that would be a fun thought.


My money is also on a lockout a lot of teams are heading towards cap hell and the league will reach a point where it’s best talent won’t be making money because of bad cap management I would love to see every team in the league get a compliance buyout where they can take any contract they want off their books and give them more cap space I would rather have this system even if it isn’t annual than a cap that may or may not go up every season
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:20 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 71
Only problem here is you are a few million short of resigning Strome and Cat and fielding a 23 man roster in 2020.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:22 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 71
Quoting: badhombre
3 years $21 million for Pavelski AAV $7 million is a steal for Pavelski I can’t imagine San Jose being against resigning him for that deal


I'm sure SJ would love to match or beat that offer, but they dont have the cap room to do it.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:23 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
The ideal is that Alex and Dylan get matching bridge contracts for 2 or 3 years in the $6 or $7 million range. Wait till that Seabrook contract disappears lol but too hard to tell if this will happen since players wanna get paid big and they have every right
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:26 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Thats what happens to teams that draft well, they get penalized and have to get rid of their players, Tampa bay eg number 1
JackBurton and badhombre liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:26 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 17
Quoting: mhockey91
I'm gearing up towards a future lockout. the league cant sustain with guys like Hayes making more than Pasta like you said. Imagine in the next CBA the league adds an "opt out" option similar to the NBA. would be insane. it won't happen obviously but that would be a fun thought.


Read an article that said under current cba if player salaries is more than 50% of revenue it goes into escrow. Do you know how that works? This seems to be the #1 issue for players.
mhockey91 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:26 a.m.
#17
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
If Hayes is making 7, Pavelski is a steal at 8mil. Dude scored nearly 40 goals last year, and hasn't dipped below 60 points in a full season in like a decade. He's worth at least 8, maybe more if he's only getting two years.


I agree with you and the others, he is definitely worth the 8 and a longer contract. It just wouldn't be a good thing for the Hawks with Cat & Strome's contracts coming up. Raises a good point though, can you give him the 7x3 to make him happy, and find a way to fire Anisimov out of a cannon, control your bonus situations, and maybe even think of buying out Seabrook to make it work?

I have long said that Seabs, despite his dumbass anchor contract, deserves to retire a Hawk. He earned it. If we're talking Pavelski for a few years, suddenly I'm a lot less nostalgic about that game 7 OT shot over Jimmy Howard's glove...
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:29 a.m.
#18
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Quoting: badhombre
Inflation in contracts has definitely become a trend I can’t fathom how Hayes has a better deal than Pastrnak I wonder if players are doing this on purpose so the league is forced to raise the salary cap exponentially which would work out in the players favor


Free agency really is ****ing insanity. The whole derby style free for all is just going to get worse now, with Matt Duchene about to strut into all his meetings with a gilded ****ing suit, playing Vince McMahon's "money" entrance theme.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:32 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
Quoting: stoker
Read an article that said under current cba if player salaries is more than 50% of revenue it goes into escrow. Do you know how that works? This seems to be the #1 issue for players.


A percentage of every player’s earnings is set aside every season and at the end if hockey related revenues don’t meet projections then the league keeps the difference and players lose that money.
mhockey91 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:35 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 17
Edited Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:47 a.m.
Quoting: badhombre
A percentage of every player’s earnings is set aside every season and at the end if hockey related revenues don’t meet projections then the league keeps the difference and players lose that money.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:38 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 17
So the higher earners lose more money?
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:39 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 17
Quoting: stoker


So the higher earners lose more money?
Jun. 19, 2019 at 1:53 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41
Likes: 18
Quoting: stoker
So the higher earners lose more money?


Yes and revenues are affected by a lot of things like the value of the canadian dollar and it’s a big factor in whether the salary cap is going to go up or not I’m no expert in this but I from what I’ve read guys like Toews are losing 10% of what they’re making because they’ve had to make up the difference
stoker liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 2:16 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: stoker
Read an article that said under current cba if player salaries is more than 50% of revenue it goes into escrow. Do you know how that works? This seems to be the #1 issue for players.


Quoting: badhombre
A percentage of every player’s earnings is set aside every season and at the end if hockey related revenues don’t meet projections then the league keeps the difference and players lose that money.


Yup. That’s exactly how that works. Most people don’t realize that. So players on low earning teams like Arizona and Carolina suffer the most
bunnymcfoo and stoker liked this.
Jun. 19, 2019 at 2:49 a.m.
#25
oh how i suffer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 852
Likes: 332
Quoting: badhombre
3 years $21 million for Pavelski AAV $7 million is a steal for Pavelski I can’t imagine San Jose being against resigning him for that deal


Depends on San Jose being able to find that money to be very honest, and that might be a stretch with the Karlsson contract. I don't think we've looked under all the couch cushions yet....
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll