SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blackhawks back into playoffs

Created by: Logan03
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 19, 2019
Published: Jun. 19, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Idk if these could happen but would make a big change for the better and possibly another cup, much stronger defense and better top 6, could improve bottom 6 at deadline
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,150,000
2$1,250,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$6,500,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (EDM)
2.
CHI
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin ($2,500,000 retained)
  2. Vesey, Jimmy
NYR
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Seabrook, Brent
  3. 2020 1st round pick (CHI)
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. van Riemsdyk, Trevor
Additional Details:
1.5M 2Y extension
CAR
  1. Dahlström, Carl
  2. 2020 5th round pick (CHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,000,000$55,513,353$0$3,782,500$26,486,647
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,275,000$2,275,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,150,000$1,150,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
-$750,000-$750,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 19, 2019 at 4:58 p.m.
#1
Go Jets, Go Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 320
Likes: 44
No one....and I mean no one is taking any bad contracts with no movement clauses...because they have to be protected during the expansion draft....so that trade is not happening....The Haws cannot get rid of either Keith or Seabrook until after the expansion draft...
Jun. 19, 2019 at 5:05 p.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 9,697
Edited Jun. 19, 2019 at 5:24 p.m.
Quoting: BigE
No one....and I mean no one is taking any bad contracts with no movement clauses...because they have to be protected during the expansion draft....so that trade is not happening....The Haws cannot get rid of either Keith or Seabrook until after the expansion draft...


For the most part I agree it would be difficult, but I could see a few special exceptions. The Hawks for example Could indeed take a forward with a NMC. They go 7 - 3 - 1...because that's the most prudent. They let Maatta/Murphy be exposed. Then Toews, Kane, Debrincat, Strome, Saad....then who? (This specific Arm Chair Post aside) They have (2) slots available where a team like Tampa/Toronto might prefer to trade a forward to CHI in order to get assets in return rather than lose that forward for nothing?

***EDIT*** Another way of looking at it. What team would offer big assets to EDM for Pool Party if they thought Seattle was just going to scoop him up? Stan's in a position where he can offer up assets and be reasonably sure that he can keep him for the long haul.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll