SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TML blockbuster

Created by: DripBayless
Team: 2019-20 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 26, 2019
Published: Jun. 26, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
solves both teams problems
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
3$3,500,000
1$700,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Haas, Gaetan
1$925,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. 2020 7th round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Manning, Brandon
  2. 2020 4th round pick (EDM)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Lucic, Milan ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,476,999$0$500,000$5,023,001

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Haas, Gaetan
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$675,000$675,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,835,000$2,835,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,150,000$1,150,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 463
Likes: 133
No thank you
- Kyle Dubas
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Probably throw Benning in and it would be a done deal, But Pool Party said he does not want to play in Canada today
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:53 p.m.
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,429
Likes: 22,636
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:55 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: palhal
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.


well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:56 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: Copenhagen
Probably throw Benning in and it would be a done deal, But Pool Party said he does not want to play in Canada today


woah what??? link me
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:57 p.m.
#6
Ryno
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.
palhal liked this.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:01 p.m.
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,429
Likes: 22,636
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev


Well I guess the the Leafs will save more when JP is waived to the Marlies. Zaitsev has been a second pairing Dman on a good team for three years. He has value as NHL Dman despite the rants on CapFriendly.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: palhal
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.


Yup, Oilers have cap problems too, if you did not notice,
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: Ryno
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:04 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: Ryno
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.


His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:07 p.m.
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,429
Likes: 22,636
Quoting: Copenhagen
Yup, Oilers have cap problems too, if you did not notice,


Yea, I noticed. Actually despite the best efforts of many CapFriendly posts, the Oilers and Leafs don't seem to be a good fit in trades.
Copenhagen liked this.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:07 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev


The big difference here though, is Zaitsev can actually play. Lucic is not worthy of the 4th line for TO.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:10 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: LoganOllivier
The big difference here though, is Zaitsev can actually play. Lucic is not worthy of the 4th line for TO.


Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing
DripBayless liked this.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:11 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: palhal
Yea, I noticed. Actually despite the best efforts of many CapFriendly posts, the Oilers and Leafs don't seem to be a good fit in trades.


I'd say that's mostly because every fan on here want every trade to be a little bit in favor of their own team. As "realistic" as it gets, we won't really know until a deal is done officially. So people can speculate and keep armchair GMing but until Holland and Dubas actually do business, every ACGM will want a trade that benefits their team more than the other and that way nobody will ever agree.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:13 p.m.
#15
Ryno
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Quoting: Copenhagen
His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)


That's true. Chiarelli's gift that keeps on giving.
Copenhagen liked this.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:16 p.m.
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,429
Likes: 22,636
Quoting: Copenhagen
Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing


But Zaitsev doesn't have a brutal contract. Other teams pay their second pairing guys about that money. Zaitsev doesn't play the PP, because of Marner has taken his spot at right point. Zaitsev plays heavy minutes against the top lines and big minutes on the PP. Leafs are need to get rid of cap space and Zaitev right or wrong seems to be target (I think a high priced forward makes more sense).
Personally I would give Zaitsev away....just to get cap space. But certainly aren't taking on bad cap and losing a competent NHL Dman too.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:18 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: Ryno
That's true. Chiarelli's gift that keeps on giving.


Quoting: Copenhagen
His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)


Well, come the summer of the expansion draft, if we bought him out then, he'd have two years left which means 4 years of dead cap if we bought him out. However, if we traded him at retained cap hit by then, it'd be 3M for the next two seasons. And don't forget his contract is front loaded. Actual money owed on Lucic last 2 years is basically half or a quarter of his cap hit.

Fact of the matter is, the closer we are to his contract's expiry date, the easier it is to trade it.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:23 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Copenhagen
Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing


Zaitsev has played 20+ minutes for the past 3 seasons on a team that has finished in the top 7 league wide the past 2 seasons. He isn't garbage, he makes about a million too much and has too much term.

So tell me, how does it make sense for a team to move a serviceable NHL player who does make more than he should, for a guy who wouldn't make the team only to shave 1 year of the contract. Keep in mind, if they move Zaitsev, they will need to replace him with something.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:33 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Zaitsev has played 20+ minutes for the past 3 seasons on a team that has finished in the top 7 league wide the past 2 seasons. He isn't garbage, he makes about a million too much and has too much term.

So tell me, how does it make sense for a team to move a serviceable NHL player who does make more than he should, for a guy who wouldn't make the team only to shave 1 year of the contract. Keep in mind, if they move Zaitsev, they will need to replace him with something.


That is why my first sentence of this thread, that i did not make said to throw in Benning, there is your replacement, Bennings stats are better than Zaitsev and will help the leafs, for me there is no way these two teams make a trade except Brown for Benning, which makes sense, but we have a different GM now and not sure if Holland is interested!, Also retaining 2 or 3 million bucks on Lucic like the guy that mad this thread said is still a problem for the Oilers
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:36 p.m.
#20
Ryno
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Well, come the summer of the expansion draft, if we bought him out then, he'd have two years left which means 4 years of dead cap if we bought him out. However, if we traded him at retained cap hit by then, it'd be 3M for the next two seasons. And don't forget his contract is front loaded. Actual money owed on Lucic last 2 years is basically half or a quarter of his cap hit.

Fact of the matter is, the closer we are to his contract's expiry date, the easier it is to trade it.


The problem isn't the money owing, it's the fact that so much of it is paid in signing bonuses, which do not provide cap relief savings in terms of the buyout. It really is, for the duration of the contract, nearly buyout proof.

I mean, we all knew that this contract would be an albatross at some time. I don't think any of us thought it would be this much of a cinder block this soon. I can honestly say I've never seen a player's skill set completely erode of a Christmas break the way Lucic's did in Christmas 2017.
Copenhagen liked this.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:38 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Copenhagen
That is why my first sentence of this thread, that i did not make said to throw in Benning, there is your replacement, Bennings stats are better than Zaitsev and will help the leafs, for me there is no way these two teams make a trade except Brown for Benning, which makes sense, but we have a different GM now and not sure if Holland is interested!, Also retaining 2 or 3 million bucks on Lucic like the guy that mad this thread said is still a problem for the Oilers


Benning hasn't really been an answer for Edmonton who hasn't made the playoffs in 2 seasons. How would he be an upgrade over Zaitsev, who plays more minutes and against top end talent? The only trade that I see with Edmonton is Brown for a pic. The Leafs need space and Brown is completely replaceable.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:46 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Benning hasn't really been an answer for Edmonton who hasn't made the playoffs in 2 seasons. How would he be an upgrade over Zaitsev, who plays more minutes and against top end talent? The only trade that I see with Edmonton is Brown for a pic. The Leafs need space and Brown is completely replaceable.


Agree with that. Either Brown for a 3rd/4th rounder or a prospect perculating in the minors like Hebig
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:49 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: Ryno
The problem isn't the money owing, it's the fact that so much of it is paid in signing bonuses, which do not provide cap relief savings in terms of the buyout. It really is, for the duration of the contract, nearly buyout proof.

I mean, we all knew that this contract would be an albatross at some time. I don't think any of us thought it would be this much of a cinder block this soon. I can honestly say I've never seen a player's skill set completely erode of a Christmas break the way Lucic's did in Christmas 2017.


agree with the second part. and I guess my whole point is that when people say we're stuck with Lucic's contract, its a bit of an exaggeration. First of all, if you're not dressing him, he's not a problem on the ice. So the Oilers could dress 12 forwards ahead of Milan. Secondly, if push came to shove at the expansion draft, yes buying him out gives us no cap flexibility, but it does mean we get to protect someone else who has more value, so still worth it. And lastly, like I said, his actual money owed is less than his cap hit. Budget teams love to eat these kinds of contracts because it helps them reach the floor. Imagine eating 50% percent of that and we're practically paying his salary to play somewhere else. I'm saying the contract is easier to move than you make it seem to be.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:53 p.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Agree with that. Either Brown for a 3rd/4th rounder or a prospect perculating in the minors like Hebig


Well considering Braun got a 2nd and a 3rd when SJ traded him to Philly, I'd say the return for Brown is a 2nd or a 3rd.
Jun. 26, 2019 at 4:59 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 390
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Well considering Braun got a 2nd and a 3rd when SJ traded him to Philly, I'd say the return for Brown is a 2nd or a 3rd.


right, Brian Boyle and Ryan Hartman both got 1st rounders back. Does that mean we're all gonna offer that? Is Sam Gagner worth a 1st rounder? Come on man. 3rd rounder + Brodziak is most I'm willing to do for Brown, anything else I'll look for third liners in FA worth 2M.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll