Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Tyler Myers (5 Years / $6,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Jul 1 at 12:47
#1
Tyler Myers has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
STANDARD CONTRACT
COMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 5 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: UFA
SIGNING TEAM: Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks
VALUE: $30,000,000
C.H.% : 7.36
SIGNING DATE: July 1, 2019
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2019-20NMC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$6,000,000$1,000,000$7,000,000$7,000,000
2020-21Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$0$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000
2021-22Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$5,000,000$2,000,000$7,000,000$7,000,000
2022-23Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$0$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000
2023-24Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$5,000,000$1,000,000$6,000,000$6,000,000
TOTAL$30,000,000$30,000,000$0$16,000,000$14,000,000$30,000,000$30,000,000
CLAUSE DETAILS: Player submits a 10 team no trade list.
CLAUSE SOURCE: CapFriendly
Jul 1 at 12:47
#2
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 297
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.
toque and pinslack liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#3
The evil stats guy
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 1,790
Well, at least its only somewhat buyout proof. Has a full NMC most years, a LNTC the last
Jul 1 at 12:48
#4
Jets
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 481
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


My thoughts exactly.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#5
TheWolfe
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 126
Likes: 51
Solid signing. About what everyone thought he'd go for and the term isn't terrible

Edit: Deal structure is a little wack
Jul 1 at 12:48
#6
AwesomeMatthews
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 694
Likes: 529
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


Myers is the kind of physical d man the Canucks were missing
Willian_Cardoso liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#7
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 921
Better than originally thought, but it's still a terrible deal.

It's structured so it's virtually buyout proof.
bixyboii liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#8
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 822
Likes: 167
I wouldn't pay Myers more than 1.5M to play for my team if I was a GM
Jul 1 at 12:50
#9
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 446
Likes: 240
Nearly unmovable, buyout proof and probably has an NMC. One of the worst FA signings in the last 10 years, book it.
Jul 1 at 12:54
#10
rangersandislesfan
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 26,882
Likes: 2,908
It's not too bad, but still an overpayment.
Jul 1 at 12:56
#11
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 79
Likes: 59
Saving grace of this contract, no NMC/NTC. Definite overpayment.
Jul 1 at 1:01
#12
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 715
Almost all UFA contracts are overpayments. That's why so many fail. It's a bidding war.
Jul 1 at 2:16
#13
Blues GM v4
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,042
Likes: 2,416
This isn't that bad. Myers is a team's ideal #3 defenseman, and while the money may be a little much, they didn't overpay with term. It's a move that makes sense and drastically improves their team right now. Good on the Canucks for not drastically overpaying for a guy that plays a prime position. He's a good complement to a Quinn Hughes as well.
Jul 1 at 2:29
#14
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: Random2152
Well, at least its only somewhat buyout proof. Has a full NMC most years, a LNTC the last


He has a full NMC year 1 & a NT for years 2&3
Random2152 liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:30
#15
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: EmperorFun
Saving grace of this contract, no NMC/NTC. Definite overpayment.


He has a full NMC in year 1 and a full NT in years 2 and 3 with a 10 team NT in the last 2 years
Jul 1 at 2:30
#16
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: Sleeping0ut1992
I wouldn't pay Myers more than 1.5M to play for my team if I was a GM


So I guess you would top out in the AHL if you were a GM
rollie1967 liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:41
#17
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 78
Likes: 18
I suppose he gets more because he's the only right hand dman with top 4 pedigree this July. Still too much aav. I was thinking he'd top out at 5mil for a 4-5year term or 4.5ish for a 5+ year term. He's had enough time now to show his worth and I don't see him at this valuation. Was always taking a backseat to Buff and Trouba with the jets; a big dman that seems to shy away from being more physical and never figured out the offensive side of the game. Still, an improvement on the right side for the nucks.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:51
#18
J.L.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 65
Matching this would have hurt the Jets in a few years.
Jul 1 at 4:54
#19
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 1,496
The money upfront is a mistake, Myers is not a top shelf D man.
He is good though
Jul 1 at 5:02
#20
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 88
Likes: 16
Seems like a slight overpayment...but then Stralman signed for 3 years at only 500k less per year.
Term is fine, this isnt a homerun, but not a wtf are you doing Benning either( ala Beagle,Schaller)
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 6:31
#21
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 233
Likes: 62
Very happy with this. Term is fine. AAV is fine. Clauses are fine. Unprotected for expansion is a nice bonus.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 10:17
#22
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 46
Likes: 10
From a Jets perspective, this is great. Myers needed to be gone. From a Canucks perspective, well.... good luck.
Jul 2 at 11:57
#23
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 112
Likes: 77
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


My thoughts exactly. I think this deal will be bad on day one, and yet I couldn't help but think "well it coud have been way worse". The fact that there was this much room for error on this deal does tell me D are still weirdly evaluated by some GMs.
Jul 2 at 10:34
#24
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 553
Likes: 45
I remember a few years ago on here in Jets forum somebody explaining to me why Myers declined w/ some sorta injury/condition thing... So I wouldn't want to invest money in him personally... He just seems like is always injured/over rated but don't produce what is wanted or is on ice when needed... HE will fit in great on CAnucks having said all that wink.
Jul 2 at 11:14
#25
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,330
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: TheWolfe
Solid signing. About what everyone thought he'd go for and the term isn't terrible

Edit: Deal structure is a little wack


That's to make him easy to move the last year. See Marleau, Patrick.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit