SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Random Krug Trade

Created by: mcordaro
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 11, 2019
Published: Jul. 11, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,000,000
2$6,000,000
1$2,900,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Sissons, Colton [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (MIN)
NSH
  1. Krug, Torey
  2. 2020 6th round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. 2020 7th round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Miller, Kevan
Additional Details:
To any team really that will take him
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NJD
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,971,667$0$2,220,000$4,528,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:30 a.m.
#1
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,461
Likes: 8,213
ive always like jankrok , always seemed he should be better than he is but Nashville is loaded back there I cant see them adding krug, is that really the return youd want for him ?
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:32 a.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
way too much for carlo and mcavoy at those terms. cut the contracts almost in half.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:34 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 297
Likes: 34
Quoting: Jfstompers
ive always like jankrok , always seemed he should be better than he is but Nashville is loaded back there I cant see them adding krug, is that really the return youd want for him ?


Maybe it could be al little more, but short answer, YES. I don't want picks, I want players. I would love a top 6 RW but that means you are not saving any cap $.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:35 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 297
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
way too much for carlo and mcavoy at those terms. cut the contracts almost in half.


I am being conservative. Essentially just wanted to illustrate there will still be a cap problem after they are signed
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:36 a.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: mcordaro
I am being conservative. Essentially just wanted to illustrate there will still be a cap problem after they are signed


not when you knock 4 million off those contracts.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:38 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 297
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
not when you knock 4 million off those contracts.


Heinen just got 2.8 mill, I think you are under estimating how much Carlo and McAvoy will get. You may be able to get carlo for $3.5 and Chuck for Around $5 mill, but not much less
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:40 a.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: mcordaro
Heinen just got 2.8 mill, I think you are under estimating how much Carlo and McAvoy will get. You may be able to get carlo for $3.5 and Chuck for Around $5 mill, but not much less


McAvoy is a group 1 RFA. if he signs 2 years it will be real cheap. As awesome as Carlo is, find me a d man that averaged 10 points a year that got paid off his entry deal.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:51 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
way too much for carlo and mcavoy at those terms. cut the contracts almost in half.


Unless they take a home team discount, Mcavoy will get about 5.5M on a 2 year term and Carlo about 2.6M. That's about 2M difference not 4M.
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:53 a.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
Unless they take a home team discount, Mcavoy will get about 5.5M on a 2 year term and Carlo about 2.6M. That's about 2M difference not 4M.


McAvoy. Is. A. Group. 1. RFA.

explain him getting 5.5 on a two year deal.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:54 a.m.
#10
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,461
Likes: 8,213
Quoting: mcordaro
Maybe it could be al little more, but short answer, YES. I don't want picks, I want players. I would love a top 6 RW but that means you are not saving any cap $.


id like a top 6 winger for this team too but I think that player should be coyle unless they add someone at this point. Thats hoping Stud or Frederiks could be that 3rd line center which they probably cant be. It will be interesting whatever they do
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:55 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
McAvoy. Is. A. Group. 1. RFA.

explain him getting 5.5 on a two year deal.


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15E1qqh3OfHvvhbv_pICfKT7VR1jJEVhWQOyKviWLN54/edit#gid=707766415

Evolving wild has crunched the numbers.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 7:56 a.m.
#12
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911


cool. evolving wild stinks. guarantee you they have no idea what a group 1 RFA is. come up with your own reason. Why does McAvoy get that much on a 2 year deal when it's the most player friendly term, and he has zero leverage.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 8:25 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 439
Likes: 82
Quoting: mcordaro
I am being conservative. Essentially just wanted to illustrate there will still be a cap problem after they are signed


Quoting: mcordaro
I am being conservative. Essentially just wanted to illustrate there will still be a cap problem after they are signed


not sure if the numbers changed since your comment but i dont think you get mcavoy for anything less than 7 mill. and i doubt he signs for 2 years
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 10:27 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
cool. evolving wild stinks. guarantee you they have no idea what a group 1 RFA is. come up with your own reason. Why does McAvoy get that much on a 2 year deal when it's the most player friendly term, and he has zero leverage.


LOL...He signed his ELC at 19 years old and it's been 3 years since, he's a group 2 RFA. Evolving wild has for the most part been within 1% with their predictions. I presented you with numbers, the onus is on you to show why you think he is worth less without spewing BS.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 10:28 a.m.
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
LOL...He signed his ELC at 19 years old and it's been 3 years since, he's a group 2 RFA. Evolving wild has for the most part been within 1% with their predictions. I presented you with numbers, the onus is on you to show why you think he is worth less without spewing BS.


well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"

Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 10:33 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"

Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.


"In the event that an 18 year old or 19 year old Player signs an SPC with a
Club but does not play at least ten (10) NHL Games in the first season
under that SPC, the term of his SPC and his number of years in the Entry
Level System shall be extended for a period of one (1) year, except that
this automatic extension will not apply to a Player who is 19 according to
Section 9.2 by virtue of turning 20 between September 16 and December
31 in the year in which he first signs an SPC. Unless a Player and Club
expressly agree to the contrary, in the event a Player's SPC is extended an
additional year in accordance with this subsection, all terms of the SPC,
with the exception of Signing Bonuses, but including Paragraph 1 Salary,
games played bonuses and Exhibit 5 bonuses, shall be extended; provided,
however, that the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary shall be extended in all
circumstances.

He was 19 so exempt and he has a December Birthday
Jul. 11, 2019 at 10:38 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"

Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.


They were close on Zuccarello, Myers, Lee, Eberle, Myers ...all contracts around the range where Mcavoy will sign
Jul. 11, 2019 at 10:47 a.m.
#18
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
"In the event that an 18 year old or 19 year old Player signs an SPC with a
Club but does not play at least ten (10) NHL Games in the first season
under that SPC, the term of his SPC and his number of years in the Entry
Level System shall be extended for a period of one (1) year, except that
this automatic extension will not apply to a Player who is 19 according to
Section 9.2 by virtue of turning 20 between September 16 and December
31 in the year in which he first signs an SPC. Unless a Player and Club
expressly agree to the contrary, in the event a Player's SPC is extended an
additional year in accordance with this subsection, all terms of the SPC,
with the exception of Signing Bonuses, but including Paragraph 1 Salary,
games played bonuses and Exhibit 5 bonuses, shall be extended; provided,
however, that the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary shall be extended in all
circumstances.

He was 19 so exempt and he has a December Birthday


K. But he's still a group 1. That's literally why he's group 1. Because he was 19 when he signed, he didn't have a year tacked on his entry deal, which is why he's a group 1. Everyone acknowledges this except a couple bad writers that don't know what they're talking about.

Evolving Wild (trash guesswork), has him at a .2% chance of signing a 1 year deal. A lot of group 1 RFAs sign 1 year deals. They have him at 6 years and 7 million. That doesn't say anything about a 2 year deal. A 2 year deal is a totally different world of contract negotiations.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 11:01 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
K. But he's still a group 1. That's literally why he's group 1. Because he was 19 when he signed, he didn't have a year tacked on his entry deal, which is why he's a group 1. Everyone acknowledges this except a couple bad writers that don't know what they're talking about.

Evolving Wild (trash guesswork), has him at a .2% chance of signing a 1 year deal. A lot of group 1 RFAs sign 1 year deals. They have him at 6 years and 7 million. That doesn't say anything about a 2 year deal. A 2 year deal is a totally different world of contract negotiations.


Group 1 "Literally" mean's you're still on your ELC...McAvoy is not, he is now a group 2 RFA...Where are these plethora of people who acknowledge BS? even CapFriendly doesn't as they have him as RFA coming off his ELC...Also for Evolving Wild...try scrolling over to the right a bit and see what they project salary wise for each year term.
johnston3504 liked this.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 11:06 a.m.
#20
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
Group 1 "Literally" mean's you're still on your ELC...McAvoy is not, he is now a group 2 RFA...Where are these plethora of people who acknowledge BS? even CapFriendly doesn't as they have him as RFA coming off his ELC...Also for Evolving Wild...try scrolling over to the right a bit and see what they project salary wise for each year term.


ah. okay. I see the problem here.
Group one, literally means that you are off your ELC. Countless resources can tell you this, but I don't think you need to go there. It is called a group 1 RFA. RFA stands for restricted free agent. There are two big examples of that this year, Boeser, and McAvoy. Both are acknowledged by all the media guys as exactly what they are, group one restricted free agents.

If group 1 RFA meant that you were still on your entry level deal, why would it be called group 1 rfa? why would it be called anything? Why wouldn't it just be called the players entry level deal?
Jul. 11, 2019 at 11:11 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
ah. okay. I see the problem here.
Group one, literally means that you are off your ELC. Countless resources can tell you this, but I don't think you need to go there. It is called a group 1 RFA. RFA stands for restricted free agent. There are two big examples of that this year, Boeser, and McAvoy. Both are acknowledged by all the media guys as exactly what they are, group one restricted free agents.

If group 1 RFA meant that you were still on your entry level deal, why would it be called group 1 rfa? why would it be called anything? Why wouldn't it just be called the players entry level deal?


I've got the CBA right in front of me:

Subject to subsection (c) below, the period covered by the SPC for every Rookie,
and the number of years that such Player will be in the Entry Level System and subject to the
compensation limits set out in this Article, shall be as indicated on the chart immediately below,
and during such period, the Player shall be deemed to be a "Group 1 Player":
First SPC Signing Age
Period Covered by First SPC
and Years in the Entry Level System
and Subject to Compensation Limits
18-21 3 years
22-23 2 years
24 1 year
25 and older No required number of years, not in the Entry Level
System and not subject to limits on compensation
Jul. 11, 2019 at 11:23 a.m.
#22
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
I've got the CBA right in front of me:

Subject to subsection (c) below, the period covered by the SPC for every Rookie,
and the number of years that such Player will be in the Entry Level System and subject to the
compensation limits set out in this Article, shall be as indicated on the chart immediately below,
and during such period, the Player shall be deemed to be a "Group 1 Player":
First SPC Signing Age
Period Covered by First SPC
and Years in the Entry Level System
and Subject to Compensation Limits
18-21 3 years
22-23 2 years
24 1 year
25 and older No required number of years, not in the Entry Level
System and not subject to limits on compensation


Right, but you're looking at the wrong thing. 10.2 is what you want.

For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year

This is pretty simple stuff, and rather than run to the CBA, I think you should just check out one of the 100,000 hockey writers that have accurately said that mcavoy and boeser are not eligible for an offer sheet.

You need 3 years of accrued service to be eligible for an offer sheet.
you need 7 years of accrued service to be eligible for UFA status (or be 27 years old)
Boeser played 9 games his rookie year, so he only has two years of accrued service.
McAvoy played 6. so he only has two as well.

Neither are eligible for an offer sheet. It's just a fact man. sorry.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 11:45 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Right, but you're looking at the wrong thing. 10.2 is what you want.

For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year

This is pretty simple stuff, and rather than run to the CBA, I think you should just check out one of the 100,000 hockey writers that have accurately said that mcavoy and boeser are not eligible for an offer sheet.

You need 3 years of accrued service to be eligible for an offer sheet.
you need 7 years of accrued service to be eligible for UFA status (or be 27 years old)
Boeser played 9 games his rookie year, so he only has two years of accrued service.
McAvoy played 6. so he only has two as well.

Neither are eligible for an offer sheet. It's just a fact man. sorry.


Quoting: Bcarlo25
Right, but you're looking at the wrong thing. 10.2 is what you want.

For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year

This is pretty simple stuff, and rather than run to the CBA, I think you should just check out one of the 100,000 hockey writers that have accurately said that mcavoy and boeser are not eligible for an offer sheet.

You need 3 years of accrued service to be eligible for an offer sheet.
you need 7 years of accrued service to be eligible for UFA status (or be 27 years old)
Boeser played 9 games his rookie year, so he only has two years of accrued service.
McAvoy played 6. so he only has two as well.

Neither are eligible for an offer sheet. It's just a fact man. sorry.


Dude you are so ignorant it's not even funny. Try reading the header 10.2(a) "Group 2 Players and Free agents"...this is what I've been saying all along. McAvoy is a Group 2 RFA. This is getting exhausting. Read a bit instead of saying "herrrr duurrrr everybody says that he's group 1 so it must be true" you haven't even shown me one article where somebody states that he is a group 1 RFA.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 12:03 p.m.
#24
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: K_Hab
Dude you are so ignorant it's not even funny. Try reading the header 10.2(a) "Group 2 Players and Free agents"...this is what I've been saying all along. McAvoy is a Group 2 RFA. This is getting exhausting. Read a bit instead of saying "herrrr duurrrr everybody says that he's group 1 so it must be true" you haven't even shown me one article where somebody states that he is a group 1 RFA.


Hey man, if you want to be the guy sitting there saying 2+2=goldfish, who am I to stop you. I'll be the guy back down here on earth, knowing that it's 4. Group 1 RFA's that aren't eligible for an offer sheet aren't a new thing. General managers have acknowledged that he can't get an offer sheet. Top reporters like McKenzie have said the same. I don't really feel like doing your googling for you just because you've been dead wrong this whole time, but I googled Charlie McAvoy offer sheet and here were the top results.

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/10/why-burning-year-one-of-charlie-mcavoys-contract-isnt-a-big-deal/

https://causewaycrowd.com/2019/07/07/boston-bruins-charlie-mcavoy-leverage/

https://www.nhl.com/news/charlie-mcavoy-priority-for-boston-bruins-in-free-agency/c-308119450

(NHL.com says he can't get an offer sheet. whomp whomp.)

https://twitter.com/MattKalman/status/1145479891103752192

literally the first 5 things. was that really that hard?
Now, you were saying something about ignorance right?
ngikas liked this.
Jul. 11, 2019 at 12:39 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Hey man, if you want to be the guy sitting there saying 2+2=goldfish, who am I to stop you. I'll be the guy back down here on earth, knowing that it's 4. Group 1 RFA's that aren't eligible for an offer sheet aren't a new thing. General managers have acknowledged that he can't get an offer sheet. Top reporters like McKenzie have said the same. I don't really feel like doing your googling for you just because you've been dead wrong this whole time, but I googled Charlie McAvoy offer sheet and here were the top results.

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/10/why-burning-year-one-of-charlie-mcavoys-contract-isnt-a-big-deal/

https://causewaycrowd.com/2019/07/07/boston-bruins-charlie-mcavoy-leverage/

https://www.nhl.com/news/charlie-mcavoy-priority-for-boston-bruins-in-free-agency/c-308119450

(NHL.com says he can't get an offer sheet. whomp whomp.)

https://twitter.com/MattKalman/status/1145479891103752192

literally the first 5 things. was that really that hard?
Now, you were saying something about ignorance right?


Great, so the articles you just cited prove my point, congratulations...he's a group 2 RFA, that due to not having played over 40 games in his first year, is not eligible to receive an offer sheet...where in these articles does it say that he is group 1? Group1 would mean that he is still on his ELC...he is not...He received a qualifying offer from the Bruins (because he is a group 2 RFA), that as long as he doesn't sign, is free to sit out until an agreement is reached...soooo yes, you are ignorant.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll