SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Binnington Terrible deal but Signed

Created by: Shylo_Moxii
Team: 2019-20 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2019
Published: Jul. 13, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
https://twitter.com/StLouisBlues/status/1150193295106199557
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,400,000
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2021
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$65,004,594$12,928$732,500$16,495,406
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,125,000$5,125,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,250,000$3,250,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$722,500$722,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,375,000$1,375,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,400,000$4,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
@rja40 @STLBlues17 @Chopper02 @mokumboi

Dreadful deal. Rebuild in 2 seasons. We should have done a 1-Year deal because now in 2 Years he is a Unrestricted Free Agent and more than likely he leaves. If he signed a 1-Year Deal he would still be a Restricted Free Agent.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:13 p.m.
#2
Jimmy Stu
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 541
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
@rja40 @STLBlues17 @Chopper02 @mokumboi

Dreadful deal. Rebuild in 2 seasons. We should have done a 1-Year deal because now in 2 Years he is a Unrestricted Free Agent and more than likely he leaves. If he signed a 1-Year Deal he would still be a Restricted Free Agent.


Exactly. And I'm sure Binnington and his agent know that, which would be why they wouldn't want a 1 year deal. The team can't just force their will on contract negotiations. I would imagine the blues offered a 1 year 'show me' and they rejected it. Hell I would too. No way the blues are offering a long term deal so this seems like a fair compromise.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
@rja40 @STLBlues17 @Chopper02 @mokumboi

Dreadful deal. Rebuild in 2 seasons. We should have done a 1-Year deal because now in 2 Years he is a Unrestricted Free Agent and more than likely he leaves. If he signed a 1-Year Deal he would still be a Restricted Free Agent.


I like it. He makes 50K more than Allen.

Any info on Dakota Joshua???
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:15 p.m.
#4
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,461
Likes: 8,213
well its that or roll the dice he is legit and sign him long term
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:16 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: Riley816
I like it. He makes 50K more than Allen.

Any info on Dakota Joshua???


When Bozak ages, Joshua is probably the guy who takes 4C.
Riley816 liked this.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:16 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: Jfstompers
well its that or roll the dice he is legit and sign him long term


Or a 1-Year Deal.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:17 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
When Bozak ages, Joshua is probably the guy who takes 4C.


Thanks.
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:29 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 653
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
@rja40 @STLBlues17 @Chopper02 @mokumboi

Dreadful deal. Rebuild in 2 seasons. We should have done a 1-Year deal because now in 2 Years he is a Unrestricted Free Agent and more than likely he leaves. If he signed a 1-Year Deal he would still be a Restricted Free Agent.


I knew it would be either a two year deal or four or more years to buy out some of his free agent years. Army was in a precarious position with Binny. He looks like he's the goalie of the future, but the sample size is small; however, the sample size is nothing like anyone has done before. This made a deal difficult to quantify. Army said he won't move Allen this year, which isn't a terrible move even though many Blues fans want to see him gone. Most of these fans are not very knowledgeable of the game I suspect, as he has stretches where he is lights out along with his annual December dud he's become infamous for. When you look at the stats though, he's a better backup than any that were available, just over-priced.

Army likely lets the coming year play out for a while before making some hard decisions. The central is much better now on paper, and the likelihood of repeating is always daunting. The Blues have a good amount of skilled players on their way and can acquire more by moving some veterans. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that Army waits until December to decide his direction. He can't just move guys like Schenn and Petro since they do have a shot to repeat. He also can't simply do nothing and possibly lose them to free agency. If we are a competitive team in December, Army extends Petro for sure and possibly Schenn. If we are a borderline team, Schenn is moved for sure and possibly Petro depending on Toronto's position. Petro isn't waiving his NTC except to his home town. Cody Ceci likely disappoints the Leafs, so such a move is perhaps possible.

Allen plays a lot on the road to build up his value. When December comes and a contender has a goalie injury, it is then that Army moves Allen and brings up a minor league journeyman rather than Husso. If he brings up Husso, he is then forced to protect either Binny or Husso when the Seattle draft occurs, and I don't think he wants to do that unless Binny flops. If Binny proves to be a one-hit wonder, Binny is left unprotected and Husso will be the man of the future. The $4.4 million contract allows him to do this. Allen will bring more due to the injury-urgency along with his probable increase in value come trade time.

My biggest fear is that Sunny just had his career year. We have no way of knowing that, but moving him now while his value is highest is tempting. It is also a huge gamble. He's our second best penalty killer, and his game fits the Blues perfectly. I think the gamble isn't worth the potential gain, but it is just a thought.
CMac66 liked this.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:30 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 653
Quoting: CMac66
I would imagine the blues offered a 1 year 'show me' and they rejected it. Hell I would too.


This about sums it up perfectly.
CMac66 and Chopper02 liked this.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:31 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: rja40
I knew it would be either a two year deal or four or more years to buy out some of his free agent years. Army was in a precarious position with Binny. He looks like he's the goalie of the future, but the sample size is small; however, the sample size is nothing like anyone has done before. This made a deal difficult to quantify. Army said he won't move Allen this year, which isn't a terrible move even though many Blues fans want to see him gone. Most of these fans are not very knowledgeable of the game I suspect, as he has stretches where he is lights out along with his annual December dud he's become infamous for. When you look at the stats though, he's a better backup than any that were available, just over-priced.

Army likely lets the coming year play out for a while before making some hard decisions. The central is much better now on paper, and the likelihood of repeating is always daunting. The Blues have a good amount of skilled players on their way and can acquire more by moving some veterans. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that Army waits until December to decide his direction. He can't just move guys like Schenn and Petro since they do have a shot to repeat. He also can't simply do nothing and possibly lose them to free agency. If we are a competitive team in December, Army extends Petro for sure and possibly Schenn. If we are a borderline team, Schenn is moved for sure and possibly Petro depending on Toronto's position. Petro isn't waiving his NTC except to his home town. Cody Ceci likely disappoints the Leafs, so such a move is perhaps possible.

Allen plays a lot on the road to build up his value. When December comes and a contender has a goalie injury, it is then that Army moves Allen and brings up a minor league journeyman rather than Husso. If he brings up Husso, he is then forced to protect either Binny or Husso when the Seattle draft occurs, and I don't think he wants to do that unless Binny flops. If Binny proves to be a one-hit wonder, Binny is left unprotected and Husso will be the man of the future. The $4.4 million contract allows him to do this. Allen will bring more due to the injury-urgency along with his probable increase in value come trade time.

My biggest fear is that Sunny just had his career year. We have no way of knowing that, but moving him now while his value is highest is tempting. It is also a huge gamble. He's our second best penalty killer, and his game fits the Blues perfectly. I think the gamble isn't worth the potential gain, but it is just a thought.


My biggest thing is that it was 2-Year not 1-Year. if it was 1 Year he would still be a restricted free agent but now after this contract he walks as unrestricted and we get screwed into a rebuild process.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:34 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 653
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
My biggest thing is that it was 2-Year not 1-Year. if it was 1 Year he would still be a restricted free agent but now after this contract he walks as unrestricted and we get screwed into a rebuild process.


I agree, but as someone else said above, Binnington's agent probably knew this and refused a one-year deal.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 8:54 p.m.
#12
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,461
Likes: 8,213
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Or a 1-Year Deal.


hed be crazy to sign a one year deal, thats why he didn't, maybe should have offered 3 years as a compromise atleast get 1 year of his ufa
CMac66, rja40 and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jul. 13, 2019 at 11:03 p.m.
#13
Sicarius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 214
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
When Bozak ages, Joshua is probably the guy who takes 4C.


Joshua will be lucky to have an NHL career. It’s far from certain.

The Binnington deal isn’t horrible. The Blues can always extend him next summer
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jul. 14, 2019 at 1:19 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 1,982
I agree @CMac66 and @rja40 here. He probably didn't want to sign a. long term deal just yet because if he builds on what he did this year he can get better money later, but he also didn't want to do just a one year deal where he can't maximize his money. I was thinking it would be a 2 to 3 year deal and it happened to be 2.Good news is if Husso lives up to his potential and Binnington leaves for more money we have a replacement. Or if Binnington plays well next year he can extend later. It's not as terrible as you think.
CMac66, Fox_Czar_Cup and rja40 liked this.
Jul. 14, 2019 at 1:22 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: Chopper02
I agree @CMac66 and @rja40 here. He probably didn't want to sign a. long term deal just yet because if he builds on what he did this year he can get better money later, but he also didn't want to do just a one year deal where he can't maximize his money. I was thinking it would be a 2 to 3 year deal and it happened to be 2.Good news is if Husso lives up to his potential and Binnington leaves for more money we have a replacement. Or if Binnington plays well next year he can extend later. It's not as terrible as you think.


I don't trust in players "loyalty" because their isn't any. Their Loyalty lays with the money...and that is why I don't trust Binnington will stay.
Jul. 14, 2019 at 1:32 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I don't trust in players "loyalty" because their isn't any. Their Loyalty lays with the money...and that is why I don't trust Binnington will stay.


If he doesn't he doesn't. Nothing we can do about it. If he builds on this year he can sign a long term higher money deal but he has to do it for longer than a 1/3 of a season and postseason.
rja40 liked this.
Jul. 14, 2019 at 1:36 a.m.
#17
Jimmy Stu
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 541
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I don't trust in players "loyalty" because their isn't any. Their Loyalty lays with the money...and that is why I don't trust Binnington will stay.


The GMs are equally as likely to 'betray' them by trading them. All I'm saying is that the players have to look out for their own interests too. Because the GMs sure won't.
rja40 liked this.
Jul. 15, 2019 at 8:12 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 48
Likes: 13
There's usually a reason guys are low on the depth chart and constantly get passed up by incoming talent. I"m a huge supporter of Binnington, but I don't can't fault this contract. People need to remember that on this contract, he's getting paid for what he DID, not what he's going to do. So prove that you weren't a fluke, and go show us that you can do it over the course of a full season and your career.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll