NJ Rangers decline.
Boston Toronto accept, but Vancouver are getting robbed.

why would boston accept? i know his teams havent necessarily been good but baertschi is worth 3m. nvm giving up steen and a 3rd. boston is willing to give kevan miller for a 4th.

Didnt realise Steen had a great year in the SHL. Maybe a C prospect instead of Steen.

Still dont want baertschi at that money, bruins need less cap right now not more of it.

I think the Toronto trade is more about clearing Tanev's cap space. I personally don't see Tanev's value all to highly now given his injury history and recent struggles on the ice. So getting a couple picks and a C prospect would seem like a fair return to me. But I can see where your're coming from.

What do you thing would be a fairer return for the Rangers? From what I understand is that they are willing to move Buchnevich given their cap situation. Id assume that any trade with the Rangers would also involve taking on a bad contract as well.

2 years at 3M, Miller gone at 2.5M so it’s basically SB vs Miller + 3rd round pick, +500K, not even a million cause they retained on Sven. Anyways, Boston decline, all good

Lol I also did not realize that Steen had a good year in the SHL. I think this trade could work by perhaps switching out the prospect for someone that's more of a project as compared to Steen.

Because I was taking Steen I tried to mitigate some of that loss from Bostons end by 1) giving them a C level prospect (Chatfield) 2) retaining salary on Sven as you mentioned and taking on Millers contract 3) I also tried to lower the risk for Boston by making the 3rd round pick conditional on Sven getting 40 points in which case I think his 3mill contract would be good value for Boston. If he does not meet the condition Boston would give a 7th round pick instead.

Regardless based on the feedback, I think Steen makes the value more lopsided for the Bruins.

Toronto can't take Tanev's cap hit, we would have to send back Ceci.

Depending on the Marner contract situation they could have more space, but also the Canucks could still retain almost 30% more of Tanev's contract, in which case I wouldn't expect the value to change much from Toronto's end and it would also help Tanev fit into the leafs cap situation. But if the Canucks didn't retain any salary on Tanev than sure they could take on Ceci.

I understand, but we have just enough for Mitch right now maybe Ceci, Petan and Holl + a 2nd, 3rd or 4th in exchange for Tanev and Virtanen? Not much savings but i think something like this is what Toronto would look for in a deal.